The effect of social and personal norms on stated preferences for multiple soil functions: evidence from Australia and Italy

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-15 DOI:10.1111/1467-8489.12466
Cristiano Franceschinis, Ulf Liebe, Mara Thiene, Jürgen Meyerhoff, Damien Field, Alex McBratney
{"title":"The effect of social and personal norms on stated preferences for multiple soil functions: evidence from Australia and Italy","authors":"Cristiano Franceschinis,&nbsp;Ulf Liebe,&nbsp;Mara Thiene,&nbsp;Jürgen Meyerhoff,&nbsp;Damien Field,&nbsp;Alex McBratney","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.12466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although soil degradation has become a global phenomenon that might severely threaten the provision of a large range of ecosystem services, not much is known about the economic value of soil functions such as carbon sequestration and rainfall water infiltration. Knowing these values would be an important input into the recently developed concept of Soil Security. This paper aimed at closing this gap for a broad set of soil functions valued at the regional level in the Veneto region in Italy and New South Wales in Australia. The study not only elicits non-market values by a choice experiment but also investigates the impact of personal norm activation and social norms on stated preferences, by a hybrid choice model with multiple latent variables. As the survey was conducted in two countries, our study offers evidence of the external validity of both social norm effects and personal norm activation. The results reveal that respondents positively value the conservation of the soil functions and that both personal norm activation and social norm clearly affect stated preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"66 2","pages":"335-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Although soil degradation has become a global phenomenon that might severely threaten the provision of a large range of ecosystem services, not much is known about the economic value of soil functions such as carbon sequestration and rainfall water infiltration. Knowing these values would be an important input into the recently developed concept of Soil Security. This paper aimed at closing this gap for a broad set of soil functions valued at the regional level in the Veneto region in Italy and New South Wales in Australia. The study not only elicits non-market values by a choice experiment but also investigates the impact of personal norm activation and social norms on stated preferences, by a hybrid choice model with multiple latent variables. As the survey was conducted in two countries, our study offers evidence of the external validity of both social norm effects and personal norm activation. The results reveal that respondents positively value the conservation of the soil functions and that both personal norm activation and social norm clearly affect stated preferences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会和个人规范对多种土壤功能偏好的影响:来自澳大利亚和意大利的证据
尽管土壤退化已成为一种全球现象,可能严重威胁到大量生态系统服务的提供,但人们对土壤功能(如碳固存和雨水渗透)的经济价值知之甚少。了解这些值将是对最近发展的土壤安全概念的重要投入。本文旨在缩小这一差距,在意大利威尼托地区和澳大利亚新南威尔士州的区域一级评价广泛的土壤功能。本研究不仅通过选择实验引出非市场价值,还通过多潜变量混合选择模型探讨了个人规范激活和社会规范对陈述偏好的影响。由于调查是在两个国家进行的,我们的研究为社会规范效应和个人规范激活的外部有效性提供了证据。结果表明,被调查者积极评价土壤功能的保持,个人规范激活和社会规范都明显影响他们的陈述偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Measuring quantity in ecosystem markets and ecosystem accounts Electricity contract design and wholesale market outcomes in Australia's National Electricity Market Beyond risk management: Crop insurance premium subsidies reduce cropland abandonment in China Effect of dependence on natural resources on employment quality: Insights from African countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1