Changes in condylar position with maxillary expansion in growing patients. A systematic review of clinical studies

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Orthodontic Waves Pub Date : 2020-02-27 DOI:10.1080/13440241.2020.1733297
Zhihui Wang, S. Obamiyi, S. Malik, P. Rossouw, R. Tallents, D. Michelogiannakis
{"title":"Changes in condylar position with maxillary expansion in growing patients. A systematic review of clinical studies","authors":"Zhihui Wang, S. Obamiyi, S. Malik, P. Rossouw, R. Tallents, D. Michelogiannakis","doi":"10.1080/13440241.2020.1733297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose:The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the association between maxillary expansion (ME) and changes in condylar position in growing patients, including patients with functional unilateral posterior crossbite (FUPC), patients with bilateral posterior crossbite (BPC) and patients who have maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD) without posterior crossbite (PC). Materials and methods: Indexed databases were searched up to March 2019, and the following eligibility criteria were imposed: (a) original clinical studies; (b) growing patients; (c) intervention: influence of ME on condylar position; (d) radiographic evaluation of condylar position before and after ME; and (e) statistical analysis. Experimental studies, historic reviews, case reports, cases-series, letters to the Editor, commentaries, studies that did not specify the type of posterior crossbite (PC), studies that included combined ME-facemask intervention, and studies in adult patients were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) guidelines. Results:Eleven clinical studies were selected for data extraction. In 3 studies, significant changes in condylar position were observed bilaterally with ME in patients with FUPC. One study showed significant changes in condylar position with ME only in the non-crossbite sides; and 2 studies found no significant changes in condylar position with ME in patients with FUPC. One study reported significant changes in condylar position in both sides with ME in patients with bilateral PC. In patients without PC, 1 study showed significant changes in condylar position bilaterally with ME; and 2 studies reported no significant changes in condylar position. The mean MINORS score was 13.8 2.89 (out of 24). Conclusion:The association between ME and changes in condylar position in growing patients remains debatable.","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13440241.2020.1733297","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13440241.2020.1733297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose:The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the association between maxillary expansion (ME) and changes in condylar position in growing patients, including patients with functional unilateral posterior crossbite (FUPC), patients with bilateral posterior crossbite (BPC) and patients who have maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD) without posterior crossbite (PC). Materials and methods: Indexed databases were searched up to March 2019, and the following eligibility criteria were imposed: (a) original clinical studies; (b) growing patients; (c) intervention: influence of ME on condylar position; (d) radiographic evaluation of condylar position before and after ME; and (e) statistical analysis. Experimental studies, historic reviews, case reports, cases-series, letters to the Editor, commentaries, studies that did not specify the type of posterior crossbite (PC), studies that included combined ME-facemask intervention, and studies in adult patients were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) guidelines. Results:Eleven clinical studies were selected for data extraction. In 3 studies, significant changes in condylar position were observed bilaterally with ME in patients with FUPC. One study showed significant changes in condylar position with ME only in the non-crossbite sides; and 2 studies found no significant changes in condylar position with ME in patients with FUPC. One study reported significant changes in condylar position in both sides with ME in patients with bilateral PC. In patients without PC, 1 study showed significant changes in condylar position bilaterally with ME; and 2 studies reported no significant changes in condylar position. The mean MINORS score was 13.8 2.89 (out of 24). Conclusion:The association between ME and changes in condylar position in growing patients remains debatable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生长期患者髁突位置随上颌扩大的变化。临床研究的系统综述
摘要目的:本系统综述的目的是评估生长中患者的上颌骨扩张(ME)与髁突位置变化之间的关系,包括功能性单侧后反牙(FUPC)患者、双侧后反牙患者和无后反牙的上颌骨横向缺损(MTD)患者。材料和方法:检索截至2019年3月的索引数据库,并采用以下资格标准:(a)原始临床研究;(b) 成长中的患者;(c) 干预:ME对髁突位置的影响;(d) ME前后髁突位置的影像学评价;以及(e)统计分析。排除了实验研究、历史回顾、病例报告、病例系列、致编辑的信、评论、没有具体说明后交叉牙(PC)类型的研究、包括ME面罩联合干预的研究以及对成年患者的研究。使用非随机研究方法指数(MINORS)指南进行质量评估。结果:选择11项临床研究进行数据提取。在3项研究中,观察到FUPC患者双侧ME髁突位置的显著变化。一项研究表明,只有在非反牙侧,ME导致髁突位置发生显著变化;2项研究发现FUPC患者的ME髁突位置没有显著变化。一项研究报告了双侧PC患者双侧ME髁突位置的显著变化。在没有PC的患者中,1项研究显示双侧ME髁状突位置发生显著变化;2项研究报告髁突位置无明显变化。MINORS的平均得分为13.82.89(满分24分)。结论:ME与生长期患者髁突位置变化之间的关系仍有争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontic Waves
Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Condylectomy as a treatment approach to condylar hyperplasia Effectiveness of a fluoride-releasing orthodontic primer in reducing demineralization around brackets – a systematic review Updates on periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics Incidence of impacted teeth requiring fenestration, traction, and orthodontic treatment in Japan Bond strength of orthodontic buttons on clear aligner materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1