A Multicenter Study of Antifungal Use and Species Distribution and Antifungal usceptibilities of Candida Isolates in South Korea

J. Shin, E. Won, S. Kim, Jongcheol Shin, Dain Lee, Dong Hyun Lee, Y. A. Kim, Jongyoun Yi, J. Shin, K. Shin, S. Jeong
{"title":"A Multicenter Study of Antifungal Use and Species Distribution and Antifungal usceptibilities of Candida Isolates in South Korea","authors":"J. Shin, E. Won, S. Kim, Jongcheol Shin, Dain Lee, Dong Hyun Lee, Y. A. Kim, Jongyoun Yi, J. Shin, K. Shin, S. Jeong","doi":"10.17966/jmi.2020.25.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Candidiasis control should include monitoring the epidemiology and resistance to various antifungal agents. In this study, the researchers investigated the Candida species recovered from clinical specimens at particular geographic areas or hospitals.\nObjective: The present study is geared toward the evaluation of antifungal drug usage at Korean hospitals in 2016. It is also essential that species distribution and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida isolates should be looked into to provide important data that can help devise therapeutic strategies to control the disease.\nMethods: Systemic antifungal agent usage over a one-year period was investigated at 10 Korean hospitals. Identification and antifungal susceptibility tests were performed on clinical isolates of the Candida species, which were collected over a three-month period.\nResults: The total antifungal usage in each hospital ranged from 7.7 to 158.9 defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1,000 patient days. Fluconazole was most commonly used (37.1%), followed by amphotericin B (30.6%), itraconazole (9.7%), echinocandins (8.8%), voriconazole (7.5%), and posaconazole (6.3%), respectively. Among 274 Candida\nisolates, C. albicans was the most frequently recovered (51.1%), followed by C. glabrata (15.7%), C. tropicalis (15.0%), and C. parapsilosis (13.5%), respectively. Through the application of either species-specific clinical breakpoints or epidemiological cutoff values to Candida isolates, the non-susceptibility rates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin were found in 20.7%, 5.6%, 0%, and 0% of isolates, respectively.\nConclusion: This nationwide multicenter study showed that total antifungal use varied considerably according to each hospital. Non-susceptibility to fluconazole should be further monitored, considering the drug's frequent use in Korea.","PeriodicalId":36021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mycology and Infection","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mycology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17966/jmi.2020.25.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Candidiasis control should include monitoring the epidemiology and resistance to various antifungal agents. In this study, the researchers investigated the Candida species recovered from clinical specimens at particular geographic areas or hospitals. Objective: The present study is geared toward the evaluation of antifungal drug usage at Korean hospitals in 2016. It is also essential that species distribution and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida isolates should be looked into to provide important data that can help devise therapeutic strategies to control the disease. Methods: Systemic antifungal agent usage over a one-year period was investigated at 10 Korean hospitals. Identification and antifungal susceptibility tests were performed on clinical isolates of the Candida species, which were collected over a three-month period. Results: The total antifungal usage in each hospital ranged from 7.7 to 158.9 defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1,000 patient days. Fluconazole was most commonly used (37.1%), followed by amphotericin B (30.6%), itraconazole (9.7%), echinocandins (8.8%), voriconazole (7.5%), and posaconazole (6.3%), respectively. Among 274 Candida isolates, C. albicans was the most frequently recovered (51.1%), followed by C. glabrata (15.7%), C. tropicalis (15.0%), and C. parapsilosis (13.5%), respectively. Through the application of either species-specific clinical breakpoints or epidemiological cutoff values to Candida isolates, the non-susceptibility rates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin were found in 20.7%, 5.6%, 0%, and 0% of isolates, respectively. Conclusion: This nationwide multicenter study showed that total antifungal use varied considerably according to each hospital. Non-susceptibility to fluconazole should be further monitored, considering the drug's frequent use in Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国念珠菌的抗真菌使用、种类分布和抗真菌敏感性的多中心研究
背景:念珠菌感染的控制应包括监测流行病学和对各种抗真菌药物的耐药性。在这项研究中,研究人员调查了在特定地理区域或医院从临床标本中回收的念珠菌。目的:本研究旨在评估2016年韩国医院抗真菌药物的使用情况。同样重要的是,应研究念珠菌分离株的物种分布和抗真菌易感性,以提供重要数据,帮助制定控制疾病的治疗策略。方法:对韩国10家医院一年来的系统抗真菌药物使用情况进行调查。对念珠菌的临床分离株进行了鉴定和抗真菌药敏试验,这些分离株是在三个月内收集的。结果:每家医院的抗真菌药物使用总量为每1000个患者日7.7至158.9个限定日剂量(DDDs)。氟康唑最常用(37.1%),其次是两性霉素B(30.6%)、伊曲康唑(9.7%)、棘白菌素(8.8%)、伏立康唑(7.5%)和泊沙康唑(6.3%)。在274种念珠菌中,白色念珠菌的回收率最高(51.1%),其次是光滑念珠菌(15.7%)、热带念珠菌(15.0%)和近裸念珠菌(13.5%)。通过对念珠菌分离株应用物种特异性临床断点或流行病学临界值,发现对氟康唑、伏立康唑、两性霉素B和米卡芬净的不敏感率分别为20.7%、5.6%、0%和0%。结论:这项全国性的多中心研究表明,各医院的抗真菌总使用量差异很大。考虑到氟康唑在韩国的频繁使用,应进一步监测其对氟康唑的不敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mycology and Infection
Journal of Mycology and Infection Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of mycology and infection (Acronym: JMI, Abbreviation: J Mycol Infect) aims to publish articles of exceptional interests in the field of medical mycology. The journal originally was launched in 1996 as the Korean Journal of Medical Mycology and has reformed into the current state beginning on March of 2018. The contents of the journal should elucidate important microbiological fundamentals and provide qualitative insights to respective clinical aspects. JMI underlines the submission of novel findings and studies in clinical mycology that are enriched by analyses achieved through investigative methods. The journal should be of general interests to the scientific communities at large and should provide medical societies with advanced breadth and depth of mycological expertise. In addition, the journal supplements infectious diseases in adjunct to the field of mycology to address a well-rounded understanding of infectious disorders. The Journal of mycology and infection, which is issued quarterly, in March, June, September and December each year, published in English. The scope of the Journal of mycology and infection includes invited reviews, original articles, case reports, letter to the editor, and images in mycology. The journal is compliant to peer-review/open access and all articles undergo rigorous reviewing processes by our internationally acknowledged team of editorial boards. The articles directed to publication should encompass in-depth materials that employ scholastic values of mycology and various infectious diseases. Articles responding to critical methodology and outcomes which have potential to enhance better understanding of mycology and infectious diseases are also suitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Use of Posaconazole for Cutaneous Purpureocillium lilacinum Infection Refractory to Itraconazole Differentiating Verruca Plana and Palmoplantar Keratoderma by Comparing Clinical Features Subcutaneous Basidiobolomycosis: A Rare and Underdiagnosed but Curable Fungal Infection - A Case Report A Case of Disseminated Coccidioidomycosis Confirmed by Skin Biopsy in Korea Overview of Malassezia Infection and Candidiasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1