How Rare Is Rare? How Common Is Common? Empirical Issues Associated With Binary Dependent Variables With Rare Or Common Event Rates

IF 8.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1177/10944281221083197
H. Woo, John P. Berns, Pol Solanelles
{"title":"How Rare Is Rare? How Common Is Common? Empirical Issues Associated With Binary Dependent Variables With Rare Or Common Event Rates","authors":"H. Woo, John P. Berns, Pol Solanelles","doi":"10.1177/10944281221083197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of logit and probit models when examining binary dependent variables including those in the form 0/1 (i.e., dummy variables), yes/no, and true/false (hereafter binary DVs) is commonplace. Yet, the appropriateness and effectiveness of such models are challenged when the event rate of a binary DV is rare or common. To better understand the impact on the field of strategy, we undertook a literature review and assessed recently published research in the Strategic Management Journal. We then utilized Monte Carlo simulations with results showing that as event rates become rarer or more common, issues including biased coefficients, standard error inflation, low statistical power to detect significant effects, and model convergence failure increasingly arise. In addition, small sample sizes amplified these empirical issues. Using a strategy example study, we also show how various analytic tools can lead to different findings when empirical models face an extreme event rate with small sample sizes. Based on our findings, we provide step-by-step guidance for strategy researchers going forward.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221083197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of logit and probit models when examining binary dependent variables including those in the form 0/1 (i.e., dummy variables), yes/no, and true/false (hereafter binary DVs) is commonplace. Yet, the appropriateness and effectiveness of such models are challenged when the event rate of a binary DV is rare or common. To better understand the impact on the field of strategy, we undertook a literature review and assessed recently published research in the Strategic Management Journal. We then utilized Monte Carlo simulations with results showing that as event rates become rarer or more common, issues including biased coefficients, standard error inflation, low statistical power to detect significant effects, and model convergence failure increasingly arise. In addition, small sample sizes amplified these empirical issues. Using a strategy example study, we also show how various analytic tools can lead to different findings when empirical models face an extreme event rate with small sample sizes. Based on our findings, we provide step-by-step guidance for strategy researchers going forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稀有有多稀有?常见程度如何?具有罕见或常见事件率的二元相关变量的经验问题
在检查二进制因变量时,logit和probit模型的使用是常见的,包括0/1(即伪变量)、是/否和真/假(以下称为二进制DV)形式的因变量。然而,当二元DV的事件率罕见或常见时,这种模型的适当性和有效性受到挑战。为了更好地了解对战略领域的影响,我们进行了文献综述,并评估了最近在《战略管理杂志》上发表的研究。然后,我们利用蒙特卡罗模拟,结果表明,随着事件率变得越来越少或越来越普遍,包括有偏系数、标准误差膨胀、检测显著影响的统计能力低以及模型收敛失败在内的问题越来越多地出现。此外,小样本放大了这些经验问题。通过策略示例研究,我们还展示了当经验模型面临小样本量的极端事件率时,各种分析工具如何得出不同的结果。基于我们的发现,我们为战略研究人员提供了循序渐进的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Organizational Research Methods (ORM) was founded with the aim of introducing pertinent methodological advancements to researchers in organizational sciences. The objective of ORM is to promote the application of current and emerging methodologies to advance both theory and research practices. Articles are expected to be comprehensible to readers with a background consistent with the methodological and statistical training provided in contemporary organizational sciences doctoral programs. The text should be presented in a manner that facilitates accessibility. For instance, highly technical content should be placed in appendices, and authors are encouraged to include example data and computer code when relevant. Additionally, authors should explicitly outline how their contribution has the potential to advance organizational theory and research practice.
期刊最新文献
Manipulation in Organizational Research: On Executing and Interpreting Designs from Treatments to Primes Measuring Personality When Stakes Are High: Are Graded Paired Comparisons a More Reliable Alternative to Traditional Forced-Choice Methods? The Internet Never Forgets: A Four-Step Scraping Tutorial, Codebase, and Database for Longitudinal Organizational Website Data One Size Does Not Fit All: Unraveling Item Response Process Heterogeneity Using the Mixture Dominance-Unfolding Model (MixDUM) Taking It Easy: Off-the-Shelf Versus Fine-Tuned Supervised Modeling of Performance Appraisal Text
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1