Comparison of Sleep Latency Measured by the Oxford Sleep Resistance Test and Simultaneous EEG in Japanese Patients

K. Hosokawa, Tsuguo Nishijima, T. Kizawa, F. Endo, S. Sakurai
{"title":"Comparison of Sleep Latency Measured by the Oxford Sleep Resistance Test and Simultaneous EEG in Japanese Patients","authors":"K. Hosokawa, Tsuguo Nishijima, T. Kizawa, F. Endo, S. Sakurai","doi":"10.4172/2167-0277.1000270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is observed in various pathological conditions associated with sleep disorders. However, objective methods for the assessment of EDS rely on complex electroencephalographic (EEG) recording and are impractical for use in general clinical practice. To address this issue, the Oxford Sleep Resistance Test (OSLER) has been developed for use in clinical practice overseas, though few studies have examined the reliability of the OSLER test for measuring sleep latency in Japanese patients. Thus, in the present study, we aimed to determine whether sleep latency measured via the OSLER test (SLOSLER) is consistent with that measured via EEG (SLEEG) in Japanese patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Seventeen Japanese men with OSA (mean age: 51.5 ± 9.8 years) underwent simultaneous OSLER and EEG testing a total of four times on the day following polysomnography evaluation. SLOSLER and SLEEG were compared, and the reliability of the former was analysed using Bland-Altman plots. Mean SLOSLER and SLEEG for all patients were 26.9 ± 11.6 and 25.7 ± 12.2 minutes, respectively. A significant positive correlation was observed between these measurements (p<0.0001, r=0.963). Moreover, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores were not significantly correlated with either SLOSLER or SLEEG. Bland-Altman plot analysis revealed that 94% of the plotted SLOSLER or SLEEG measurements converged within a range of mean ± 1.96 SD. Our findings thus demonstrated that SLOSLER is consistent with SLEEG in Japanese patients with OSA.","PeriodicalId":73946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sleep disorders & therapy","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sleep disorders & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0277.1000270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is observed in various pathological conditions associated with sleep disorders. However, objective methods for the assessment of EDS rely on complex electroencephalographic (EEG) recording and are impractical for use in general clinical practice. To address this issue, the Oxford Sleep Resistance Test (OSLER) has been developed for use in clinical practice overseas, though few studies have examined the reliability of the OSLER test for measuring sleep latency in Japanese patients. Thus, in the present study, we aimed to determine whether sleep latency measured via the OSLER test (SLOSLER) is consistent with that measured via EEG (SLEEG) in Japanese patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Seventeen Japanese men with OSA (mean age: 51.5 ± 9.8 years) underwent simultaneous OSLER and EEG testing a total of four times on the day following polysomnography evaluation. SLOSLER and SLEEG were compared, and the reliability of the former was analysed using Bland-Altman plots. Mean SLOSLER and SLEEG for all patients were 26.9 ± 11.6 and 25.7 ± 12.2 minutes, respectively. A significant positive correlation was observed between these measurements (p<0.0001, r=0.963). Moreover, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores were not significantly correlated with either SLOSLER or SLEEG. Bland-Altman plot analysis revealed that 94% of the plotted SLOSLER or SLEEG measurements converged within a range of mean ± 1.96 SD. Our findings thus demonstrated that SLOSLER is consistent with SLEEG in Japanese patients with OSA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛津睡眠抵抗试验与同步脑电图测定的日本患者睡眠潜伏期的比较
过度日间嗜睡(EDS)在各种与睡眠障碍相关的病理条件下被观察到。然而,评估EDS的客观方法依赖于复杂的脑电图(EEG)记录,在一般临床实践中是不切实际的。为了解决这个问题,牛津睡眠抵抗测试(OSLER)已经被开发出来用于海外的临床实践,尽管很少有研究检验了OSLER测试在日本患者中测量睡眠潜伏期的可靠性。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在确定通过OSLER测试(SLOSLER)测量的睡眠潜伏期与通过脑电图(SLEEG)测量的日本阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的睡眠潜伏期是否一致。17名日本OSA患者(平均年龄:51.5±9.8岁)在多导睡眠图评估后的当天接受了共4次OSLER和EEG测试。比较SLOSLER和SLEEG,用Bland-Altman图分析前者的信度。所有患者的SLOSLER和SLEEG平均时间分别为26.9±11.6分钟和25.7±12.2分钟。这些测量结果之间存在显著的正相关(p<0.0001, r=0.963)。此外,Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)得分与SLOSLER和SLEEG均无显著相关。Bland-Altman图分析显示,94%绘制的SLOSLER或SLEEG测量值在平均±1.96 SD范围内收敛。因此,我们的研究结果表明,SLOSLER与日本OSA患者的SLEEG一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies to Engage Blacks in Sleep Medicine: Lessons Learned from Three Studies Applying Community-Based Participatory Research Principles. Health Consequences of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Effect Of Metabolically Healthy Obesity In Male Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea The Awakening Futures Sound Positive! Commentary On The Efficacy For Audio To Counteract Sleep Inertia This Nested Case-Control Study Revealed That Patients With Obesity Experienced More Severe OSA Than Did Those With NASD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1