Perspective Taking, Self-Anchoring, and Attention to Context in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships

Q3 Psychology Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2017-10-30 DOI:10.1017/jrr.2017.20
Anca M. Miron, D. Kulibert, Alisha Petrouske, Ben Saltigerald
{"title":"Perspective Taking, Self-Anchoring, and Attention to Context in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships","authors":"Anca M. Miron, D. Kulibert, Alisha Petrouske, Ben Saltigerald","doi":"10.1017/jrr.2017.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We manipulated perspective taking and measured romantic intimates’ attention to their partners’ context. Participants read a letter supposedly from their romantic partner describing the partner's precarious situation (e.g., stress and financial issues) and either imagined their partner's difficult situation (n = 87) or remained objective and detached (n = 85). Afterwards, they drew a picture of their romantic partner in the situation (drawing task) and wrote about the thoughts they had while reading the letter (writing task). As predicted, when adopting their romantic partner's perspective (vs. remaining detached), geographically close intimates focused more on their partner's context, whereas long-distance intimates relied on self-anchoring processes to produce knowledge about their partner's feelings and thoughts in that specific situation. We discuss theoretical, clinical, and therapeutic implications of the findings for the study of differential perspective-taking processes and mechanisms in long-distance and geographically close relationships.","PeriodicalId":37757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Relationships Research","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jrr.2017.20","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Relationships Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2017.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We manipulated perspective taking and measured romantic intimates’ attention to their partners’ context. Participants read a letter supposedly from their romantic partner describing the partner's precarious situation (e.g., stress and financial issues) and either imagined their partner's difficult situation (n = 87) or remained objective and detached (n = 85). Afterwards, they drew a picture of their romantic partner in the situation (drawing task) and wrote about the thoughts they had while reading the letter (writing task). As predicted, when adopting their romantic partner's perspective (vs. remaining detached), geographically close intimates focused more on their partner's context, whereas long-distance intimates relied on self-anchoring processes to produce knowledge about their partner's feelings and thoughts in that specific situation. We discuss theoretical, clinical, and therapeutic implications of the findings for the study of differential perspective-taking processes and mechanisms in long-distance and geographically close relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远距离地缘亲密浪漫关系中的透视、自我锚定与语境关注
我们操纵了视角转换,并测量了浪漫密友对伴侣背景的关注。参与者阅读了一封据称来自浪漫伴侣的信,信中描述了伴侣的不稳定状况(例如压力和财务问题),要么想象了伴侣的困难状况(n=87),要么保持客观和超然(n=85)。之后,他们画了一张他们的浪漫伴侣在这种情况下的照片(绘画任务),并写下了他们在阅读信件时的想法(写作任务)。正如预测的那样,当采用浪漫伴侣的观点(相对于保持超然)时,地理位置较近的亲密关系更关注伴侣的背景,而远距离的亲密关系则依赖于自我锚定过程来产生关于伴侣在特定情况下的感受和想法的知识。我们讨论了这些发现对研究远距离和地理上密切关系中的差异视角获取过程和机制的理论、临床和治疗意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Relationships Research
Journal of Relationships Research Psychology-Social Psychology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This innovative journal provides researchers and practitioners with access to quality, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed articles covering the entire range of fields associated with personal, intimate, organizational and family, and social relationships, development, training and analysis of human relationship skills across the life-span. Originally an initiative of the Psychology of Relationships Interest Group of the Australian Psychological Society, the journal became independent within its first year with the intention of publishing papers from the full array of researchers of relationship. The journal features an experienced and eclectic international Editorial Board and is international in its reach. There is a special emphasis on contributions from Asia, including the subcontinent and Pacific regions but the journal welcomes papers from all other parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Factor Structure and Convergent Validity of the Portuguese version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems – 32 A Longitudinal Test of Relational Turbulence Theory Physical Attraction Scale — Short Version: Cross-Cultural Validation Perceptions of Sex Offenders’ Partners: Associated with Perceptions of Offenders and Influenced by Attachment Changes and Challenges: Parenting Challenges in Iranian Mothers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1