Expunging Originality: Alexandrian Critics in Late Antique Gaul

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1353/are.2021.0012
Brian P. Sowers
{"title":"Expunging Originality: Alexandrian Critics in Late Antique Gaul","authors":"Brian P. Sowers","doi":"10.1353/are.2021.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay examines three references to the Alexandrian critic-librarians Zenodotus and Aristarchus in the writings of Ausonius of Bordeaux: Professores 13, Epistle 10, and the preface to the Ludus Septem Sapientum. Through these references to the origins of Hellenistic bookish erudition, Ausonius defines his literary etiquette—his process of writing, circulating, and evaluating poetry—as an ongoing, albeit anachronistic, continuation of the classical past, defined by his coterie's encyclopedism and knowledge ordering. The reading advanced here offers a holistic approach to Ausonius's corpus, calling into question scholarly strategies that rely on dissecting his poetry into serious and ludic types.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"54 1","pages":"361 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2021.0012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay examines three references to the Alexandrian critic-librarians Zenodotus and Aristarchus in the writings of Ausonius of Bordeaux: Professores 13, Epistle 10, and the preface to the Ludus Septem Sapientum. Through these references to the origins of Hellenistic bookish erudition, Ausonius defines his literary etiquette—his process of writing, circulating, and evaluating poetry—as an ongoing, albeit anachronistic, continuation of the classical past, defined by his coterie's encyclopedism and knowledge ordering. The reading advanced here offers a holistic approach to Ausonius's corpus, calling into question scholarly strategies that rely on dissecting his poetry into serious and ludic types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消解原创性:古代高卢晚期的亚历山大批评家
摘要:本文考察了波尔多奥索尼乌斯著作中对亚历山大评论家图书馆员泽诺多斯和阿里斯塔克斯的三次引用:《教授13》、《书信10》和《吕都七重奏》序言。通过这些对希腊化书本式博学起源的提及,奥索尼乌斯将他的文学礼仪——他的诗歌写作、传播和评价过程——定义为对古典过去的持续延续,尽管不合时宜,但由他的小圈子的百科全书主义和知识秩序所定义。这里的高级阅读为Ausonius的语料库提供了一种全面的方法,对依赖于将他的诗歌分为严肃和滑稽类型的学术策略提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
期刊最新文献
A New Musical Helen Musical Structure in Greek Tragedy: Introduction Performing Aeschylus's Persians Musical Structure and the Interpretability of Agamemnon 1513–20 From the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1