Can intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or platelet-rich plasma increase implantation rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization with normal endometrium: boon or bane?

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Marine Medical Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jmms.jmms_89_22
S. Rai, K. Yasaswi, Rishi Raj, R. Hiremath, Smakshi Singh
{"title":"Can intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or platelet-rich plasma increase implantation rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization with normal endometrium: boon or bane?","authors":"S. Rai, K. Yasaswi, Rishi Raj, R. Hiremath, Smakshi Singh","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_89_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate if intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can improve endometrial parameters and the pregnancy rate in patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer with normal endometrial thickness. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study, at one of the assisted reproductive technique centers in central India. Data were collected from the institutional record system which was established as per the standard protocols. Data on a total of 225 patients who had an endometrial thickness >7 mm without any adjunct and underwent fresh embryo transfer in their first in vitro fertilization cycle during the past 2 years were collected and were categorized into three groups: Group A who had received intrauterine infusion of G-CSF (n = 75), Group B who received intrauterine infusion of PRP (n = 75), and Group C who (control group) received no intervention (n = 75). Results: The implantation rate was significantly higher in Group A (37.24%) than in Groups B and C (21.91% and 21.37%, respectively). No significant difference was found in the clinical pregnancy rate among Groups A, B, and C (50.68%, 40.54%, and 37.84%, respectively). Endometrial thickness increased significantly in Group A by approximately 2.3 mm. No significant change in other endometrial parameters in the three groups. The number of biochemical pregnancies was higher in the G-CSF group compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: Intrauterine infusion of G-CSF in women receiving fresh embryo transfer with normal endometrial thickness can increase endometrial thickness and the implantation rate without affecting other endometrial parameters and the cumulative pregnancy rate.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":"25 1","pages":"81 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_89_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate if intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can improve endometrial parameters and the pregnancy rate in patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer with normal endometrial thickness. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study, at one of the assisted reproductive technique centers in central India. Data were collected from the institutional record system which was established as per the standard protocols. Data on a total of 225 patients who had an endometrial thickness >7 mm without any adjunct and underwent fresh embryo transfer in their first in vitro fertilization cycle during the past 2 years were collected and were categorized into three groups: Group A who had received intrauterine infusion of G-CSF (n = 75), Group B who received intrauterine infusion of PRP (n = 75), and Group C who (control group) received no intervention (n = 75). Results: The implantation rate was significantly higher in Group A (37.24%) than in Groups B and C (21.91% and 21.37%, respectively). No significant difference was found in the clinical pregnancy rate among Groups A, B, and C (50.68%, 40.54%, and 37.84%, respectively). Endometrial thickness increased significantly in Group A by approximately 2.3 mm. No significant change in other endometrial parameters in the three groups. The number of biochemical pregnancies was higher in the G-CSF group compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: Intrauterine infusion of G-CSF in women receiving fresh embryo transfer with normal endometrial thickness can increase endometrial thickness and the implantation rate without affecting other endometrial parameters and the cumulative pregnancy rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜正常的体外受精妇女宫内输注粒细胞集落刺激因子或富血小板血浆能提高着床率吗?是利还是弊?
目的:探讨子宫内膜厚度正常的新鲜胚胎移植患者宫内输注粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)或富血小板血浆(PRP)是否能改善子宫内膜参数和妊娠率。材料和方法:我们在印度中部的一个辅助生殖技术中心进行了一项回顾性观察研究。数据是从根据标准规程建立的机构记录系统中收集的。收集近2年来第一次体外受精周期子宫内膜厚度为bbb70 mm且无任何辅助的新鲜胚胎移植患者225例资料,分为三组:a组宫内输注G-CSF (n = 75), B组宫内输注PRP (n = 75), C组(对照组)不进行干预(n = 75)。结果:A组植入率(37.24%)明显高于B、C组(21.91%、21.37%)。A、B、C组临床妊娠率差异无统计学意义(分别为50.68%、40.54%、37.84%)。A组子宫内膜厚度明显增加约2.3 mm。三组患者其他子宫内膜参数无明显变化。与其他两组相比,G-CSF组的生化妊娠数量更高。结论:子宫内膜厚度正常的新鲜胚胎移植患者宫内输注G-CSF可增加子宫内膜厚度和着床率,但不影响子宫内膜其他参数和累计妊娠率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychological Morbidity of the COVID-19 Second Wave in Health-care Workers: A Cross-sectional Online Survey Adult Acne: Its Response to Therapy Sarcoidosis and Smoking: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Single Anesthesia ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Management of Common Bile Duct Stones Evolution and Innovations in Surgical Residency Education among Global Health Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1