AB021. OP21 Obesity and appendicitis: laparoscopy vs. open technique

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI:10.21037/ales-2019-bms-32
Ö. Özozan, C. E. Guldogan, E. Gündoğdu, Mehmet Mahir Özmen
{"title":"AB021. OP21 Obesity and appendicitis: laparoscopy vs. open technique","authors":"Ö. Özozan, C. E. Guldogan, E. Gündoğdu, Mehmet Mahir Özmen","doi":"10.21037/ales-2019-bms-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The clinical results of obese patients who have undergone open or laparoscopic appendectomy, whether one technique is superior to the other is still not clearly known. In our study, we compared the clinical results of obese patients operated with laparoscopic or open technique for acute appendicitis. Methods: We performed retrospective analyses of patients operated for acute appendicitis between the dates of July 2016 and July 2019 at Istinye University Faculty of Medicine Bahçeşehir Liv Training and Research Hospital and Liv Hospital Ankara. Of 241 patients whose height and weight information were accessible, 57 had a BMI of 30 kg/m or higher. Eighteen of these patients underwent open surgery while the other 39 underwent laparoscopic surgery. The primary result criterion was complication ratio. The secondary criteria were operation time and length of hospital stay. Results: Upon comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques in terms of intraoperative-postoperative complications, operation time and length of hospital stay; statistically significant differences were found between the groups. Conclusions: In obese appendicit is patients, the laparoscopic technique proved to be superior to the open technique in criteria such as perioperative-postoperative complications and operation time etc. The length of hospital stay was determined to be similar between the groups.","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-2019-bms-32","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical results of obese patients who have undergone open or laparoscopic appendectomy, whether one technique is superior to the other is still not clearly known. In our study, we compared the clinical results of obese patients operated with laparoscopic or open technique for acute appendicitis. Methods: We performed retrospective analyses of patients operated for acute appendicitis between the dates of July 2016 and July 2019 at Istinye University Faculty of Medicine Bahçeşehir Liv Training and Research Hospital and Liv Hospital Ankara. Of 241 patients whose height and weight information were accessible, 57 had a BMI of 30 kg/m or higher. Eighteen of these patients underwent open surgery while the other 39 underwent laparoscopic surgery. The primary result criterion was complication ratio. The secondary criteria were operation time and length of hospital stay. Results: Upon comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques in terms of intraoperative-postoperative complications, operation time and length of hospital stay; statistically significant differences were found between the groups. Conclusions: In obese appendicit is patients, the laparoscopic technique proved to be superior to the open technique in criteria such as perioperative-postoperative complications and operation time etc. The length of hospital stay was determined to be similar between the groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AB021。肥胖和阑尾炎:腹腔镜与开放式技术
背景:肥胖患者接受开放式或腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床结果,一种技术是否优于另一种尚不清楚。在我们的研究中,我们比较了肥胖患者采用腹腔镜或开放式技术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床结果。方法:我们对2016年7月至2019年7月在伊斯廷耶大学医学院Bahçeşehir Liv培训研究医院和安卡拉Liv医院接受急性阑尾炎手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。在241名可以获得身高和体重信息的患者中,57名患者的BMI为30 kg/m或更高。其中18名患者接受了开放手术,另外39名患者接受腹腔镜手术。主要结果标准为并发症发生率。次要标准是手术时间和住院时间。结果:腹腔镜与开放技术在术中并发症、手术时间和住院时间方面的比较;两组间差异有统计学意义。结论:在肥胖阑尾患者中,腹腔镜技术在围手术期、术后并发症和手术时间等方面优于开放技术。两组患者的住院时间相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Minimally invasive colorectal surgery—the sky is the limit Robotic approaches for vascular and endovascular procedures: a narrative review A review of minimally invasive surgery in ulcerative colitis: more than one way to skin a cat Colon polyp characterization (morphology and mucosal patterns): clinical application and techniques Colon cancer: is the robot a better option?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1