How Can We Detect Delirium Easier Among Oncologic Patients in the Emergency Department?

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.4274/eajem.galenos.2021.93653
M. Boz, N. M. Aksu, E. Öztürk, M. Kunt, A. Batur
{"title":"How Can We Detect Delirium Easier Among Oncologic Patients in the Emergency Department?","authors":"M. Boz, N. M. Aksu, E. Öztürk, M. Kunt, A. Batur","doi":"10.4274/eajem.galenos.2021.93653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The study was planned to assess delirium for the oncologic patients admitted to ED with the complaint of altered level of consciousness, based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria, research for influencing etiologic factors and comparison of the brief Confusion Rating Method (bCAM), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and New Delirium Rating Scale (NDRS), which are considered as delirium screening tests. Materials and Methods: The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scales (RASS) calculated for all patients before applying bCAM. The patients with the RASS score between -3 and +4 had been evaluated with bCAM. Delirium was diagnosed when the third or fourth characteristic was positive as well as the first two. The MMSE and NDRS scores of all patients and the duration of three tests were calculated. Results: The MMSE and NDRS scores were 13.46±3.78 (7-20) and 21.42±3.28 (11-26) in the patients who were in delirium, respectively. Harmony between bCAM and MMSE are also statistically significant (Eta=0.70). Application period of bCAM was the shortest as 46.92±6.16 (30-60) sec. Conclusion: bCAM was applied in the shortest period of time. This result is very useful for the EDs which are racing against time in the world.","PeriodicalId":11814,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/eajem.galenos.2021.93653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study was planned to assess delirium for the oncologic patients admitted to ED with the complaint of altered level of consciousness, based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria, research for influencing etiologic factors and comparison of the brief Confusion Rating Method (bCAM), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and New Delirium Rating Scale (NDRS), which are considered as delirium screening tests. Materials and Methods: The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scales (RASS) calculated for all patients before applying bCAM. The patients with the RASS score between -3 and +4 had been evaluated with bCAM. Delirium was diagnosed when the third or fourth characteristic was positive as well as the first two. The MMSE and NDRS scores of all patients and the duration of three tests were calculated. Results: The MMSE and NDRS scores were 13.46±3.78 (7-20) and 21.42±3.28 (11-26) in the patients who were in delirium, respectively. Harmony between bCAM and MMSE are also statistically significant (Eta=0.70). Application period of bCAM was the shortest as 46.92±6.16 (30-60) sec. Conclusion: bCAM was applied in the shortest period of time. This result is very useful for the EDs which are racing against time in the world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在急诊科肿瘤患者中更容易地检测谵妄?
目的:本研究旨在根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断标准、影响病因因素的研究以及简明困惑评分法(bCAM)的比较,评估因意识水平改变而入院的肿瘤学患者的谵妄,迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和新谵妄评定量表(NDRS)被认为是谵妄筛查测试。材料和方法:在应用bCAM之前,对所有患者计算里士满激动镇静量表(RASS)。RASS评分在-3和+4之间的患者已经用bCAM进行了评估。当第三个或第四个特征以及前两个特征呈阳性时,即可诊断为谵妄。计算所有患者的MMSE和NDRS评分以及三次测试的持续时间。结果:谵妄患者的MMSE和NDRS评分分别为13.46±3.78(7-20)和21.42±3.28(11-26)。bCAM和MMSE之间的和谐度也具有统计学意义(Eta=0.70)。bCAM的应用时间最短,为46.92±6.16(30-60)秒。结论:bCAM的使用时间最短。这一结果对世界上与时间赛跑的ED非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Link between the SATIS-Stroke Questionnaire and the Modified Rankin Scale in Stroke Patients at 30 Days Post-discharge Attack on Health Care Workers: A New Complex Cancerous Humanitarian Emergency: High Time to Report and Resect Comparison of MGAP, GAP, and RTS for Predicting Early Mortality in Multiple Trauma Patients Bilateral Lingual Artery Embolization to Control Massive Oral Bleeding That Leads to Cardiac Arrest Epiglottitis with a Complication of Epiglottic Abscess: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1