Surface roughness difference of bis-acryl provisional crown material under different toothbrush filament and toothpaste abrasive degree

Halimatutsahdia Aritonang, Ika Andryas, Siti Wahyuni
{"title":"Surface roughness difference of bis-acryl provisional crown material under different toothbrush filament and toothpaste abrasive degree","authors":"Halimatutsahdia Aritonang, Ika Andryas, Siti Wahyuni","doi":"10.24198/pjd.vol35no2.46395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Brushing of provisional crown material using a toothbrush and abrasive toothpaste induced surface roughness. This study aim to determine differences in surface roughness on bis-acryl provisional crown material brushed under soft and medium filament toothbrushes with a combination of high and low abrasive toothpaste. Methods: This laboratory experimental study used 40 samples in 4 groups consisted of 10 samples for each group. Samples brushing method was carried out using a Modified V8-Brushing Machine tool for 2000 cycles at a speed of 120 cycles/minutes and a 0.2 N pressure. Results: Surface roughness measurements were measured using a profilometer. Kruskal-Wallis Statistical analysis test was used to determine significant differences between test groups. This study indicate that there is a difference in surface roughness on bis-acryl provisional crown material brushed with soft and medium filament toothbrushes with a combination of high and low abrasive toothpaste p = 0.01 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Brushing with a medium filament toothbrush resulted in  higher roughness value than brushing with a soft filament toothbrush and the group brushed with high abrasive toothpaste showed higher roughness values than brushing with low abrasive toothpaste.","PeriodicalId":31757,"journal":{"name":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol35no2.46395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Brushing of provisional crown material using a toothbrush and abrasive toothpaste induced surface roughness. This study aim to determine differences in surface roughness on bis-acryl provisional crown material brushed under soft and medium filament toothbrushes with a combination of high and low abrasive toothpaste. Methods: This laboratory experimental study used 40 samples in 4 groups consisted of 10 samples for each group. Samples brushing method was carried out using a Modified V8-Brushing Machine tool for 2000 cycles at a speed of 120 cycles/minutes and a 0.2 N pressure. Results: Surface roughness measurements were measured using a profilometer. Kruskal-Wallis Statistical analysis test was used to determine significant differences between test groups. This study indicate that there is a difference in surface roughness on bis-acryl provisional crown material brushed with soft and medium filament toothbrushes with a combination of high and low abrasive toothpaste p = 0.01 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Brushing with a medium filament toothbrush resulted in  higher roughness value than brushing with a soft filament toothbrush and the group brushed with high abrasive toothpaste showed higher roughness values than brushing with low abrasive toothpaste.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同牙刷丝和牙膏研磨度下双丙烯酸酯临时冠材料表面粗糙度的差异
简介:使用牙刷和研磨性牙膏刷临时牙冠材料会导致表面粗糙。本研究旨在确定使用高研磨性和低研磨性牙膏组合的软丝和中丝牙刷刷涂的双丙烯酸临时牙冠材料的表面粗糙度差异。方法:本实验室实验研究采用4组40份样本,每组10份。样品刷涂方法使用改进的V8刷涂机床以120次循环/分钟的速度和0.2N的压力进行2000次循环。结果:表面粗糙度测量使用轮廓仪进行。使用Kruskal-Wallis统计分析检验来确定测试组之间的显著差异。本研究表明,软丝牙刷和中丝牙刷以及高研磨性和低研磨性牙膏组合刷涂的双丙烯酸酯临时冠材料的表面粗糙度存在差异,p=0.01(p<0.05)高研磨性牙膏比用低研磨性牙膏刷牙显示出更高的粗糙度值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of mint leaves (Mentha piperita L) extracts against Streptococcus mutans UA159: a laboratory experiment Increasing knowledge and attitudes about dental caries and prevention after educational intervention using a modified lecture method in adolescents Performance analysis of DMF teeth detection using deep learning: A comparative study with clinical examination as quasi experimental study Effectiveness biduri leaf extract (Calotropis gigantea) as a denture cleanser in acrylic immersion against the growth of Candida albicans: an experimental laboratory Orthodontic treatment need from a bibliometric analysis of the last four decades: a bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1