Child Participation in the Swedish Child Protection System: Child-Friendly Focus but Limited Child Influence on Outcomes

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Childrens Rights Pub Date : 2018-03-07 DOI:10.1163/15718182-02601002
Pernilla Leviner
{"title":"Child Participation in the Swedish Child Protection System: Child-Friendly Focus but Limited Child Influence on Outcomes","authors":"Pernilla Leviner","doi":"10.1163/15718182-02601002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with children’s right to participation through legal representatives in the Swedish child protection system, with a specific focus on if and how children are given the possibility to influence decisions made about them in this context. An overall question is whether the regulation is clear as to what should be achieved when it comes to participation for children and what weight children’s wishes and views should be given. Based on a critical legal analysis it is shown that the Swedish system, although having a clear ‘child-friendly image’, is problematic in both these aspects. At present, child participation in the Swedish system is emphasised in theory and in goal-oriented statutes, while at the same time, children to a large extent are ‘legally protected’ from involvement, not the least from influencing decisions made. It is suggested that, for the Swedish child protection system to truly meet its “child-friendly” image and honestly look into how to become more child-inclusive, there is a need to re-think how to best achieve participation for children and also clarify what participation is intended to mean in practice.","PeriodicalId":46399,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childrens Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15718182-02601002","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childrens Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02601002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

This article deals with children’s right to participation through legal representatives in the Swedish child protection system, with a specific focus on if and how children are given the possibility to influence decisions made about them in this context. An overall question is whether the regulation is clear as to what should be achieved when it comes to participation for children and what weight children’s wishes and views should be given. Based on a critical legal analysis it is shown that the Swedish system, although having a clear ‘child-friendly image’, is problematic in both these aspects. At present, child participation in the Swedish system is emphasised in theory and in goal-oriented statutes, while at the same time, children to a large extent are ‘legally protected’ from involvement, not the least from influencing decisions made. It is suggested that, for the Swedish child protection system to truly meet its “child-friendly” image and honestly look into how to become more child-inclusive, there is a need to re-think how to best achieve participation for children and also clarify what participation is intended to mean in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典儿童保护系统中的儿童参与:以儿童为中心,但儿童对结果的影响有限
这条涉及儿童通过法律代表参与瑞典儿童保护制度的权利,特别侧重于儿童是否以及如何有可能影响在这方面对他们作出的决定。一个总体问题是,该条例是否明确规定了在儿童参与方面应该实现什么目标,以及儿童的愿望和意见应该得到多大的重视。根据一项批判性的法律分析,瑞典的制度虽然具有明确的“儿童友好形象”,但在这两个方面都存在问题。目前,儿童在瑞典体系中的参与在理论上和目标导向的法规中得到强调,同时,儿童在很大程度上受到"法律保护",不参与,至少不影响所作的决定。建议瑞典的儿童保护制度要真正符合其“儿童友好”的形象,并诚实地审视如何变得更加包容儿童,需要重新思考如何最好地实现儿童的参与,并在实践中明确参与的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Childrens Rights
International Journal of Childrens Rights SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
A Rights-Based Approach to Child Poverty Measurement and Child Rights Realisation in Zimbabwe Barbara Bennett Woodhouse, The Ecology of Childhood. How Our Changing World Threatens Children’s Rights Privacy as a New Component of “The Best Interests of the Child” in the New Digital Environment Unregistered Children: a Systematic Literature Review of Explanations and Consequences Associated with Failure to Fulfil Children’s Right to Registration Lydia Bracken, Same-Sex Parenting and the Best Interests Principle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1