Neonatal skin injury scales: a scoping review with narrative synthesis protocol

IF 0.6 Q4 DERMATOLOGY Wound Practice and Research Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.33235/wpr.30.3.175-178
S. Hall, D. August, F. Coyer, N. Marsh
{"title":"Neonatal skin injury scales: a scoping review with narrative synthesis protocol","authors":"S. Hall, D. August, F. Coyer, N. Marsh","doi":"10.33235/wpr.30.3.175-178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Mechanical skin injuries have been a neonatal complication since the 1980s but a number of factors affect their assessment, particularly the assessment of injury severity. Whilst there is a single severity and classification system used to assess adult pressure injuries within Australia, there are no neonatal-specific standards for injury assessment. Unfortunately, neonates sustain skin injuries frequently and, whilst there are some similarities to adult injuries, the maturity of neonatal skin puts the application of adult injury scales into question. In addition, several severity systems are currently utilised, thus outcomes for skin injury prevention or management strategies are difficult to compare. Aims This review will investigate severity scales used for neonatal skin injury. Secondly, this review will determine the (i) characteristics of severity scales such as ordinal or categorical groupings and (ii) assessment of scale validation for population. Methods This scoping review will utilise the PRISMA-ScR framework and the 2015 Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The electronic medical databases chosen are PubMed, CINAHL, COCHRANE Central and Scopus. Publications from within the last 20 years will be included to ensure the scales and the neonatal population reflect the timepoint when neonatal skin care became a safety and quality outcome as recognised by international seminal works.","PeriodicalId":44572,"journal":{"name":"Wound Practice and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33235/wpr.30.3.175-178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Mechanical skin injuries have been a neonatal complication since the 1980s but a number of factors affect their assessment, particularly the assessment of injury severity. Whilst there is a single severity and classification system used to assess adult pressure injuries within Australia, there are no neonatal-specific standards for injury assessment. Unfortunately, neonates sustain skin injuries frequently and, whilst there are some similarities to adult injuries, the maturity of neonatal skin puts the application of adult injury scales into question. In addition, several severity systems are currently utilised, thus outcomes for skin injury prevention or management strategies are difficult to compare. Aims This review will investigate severity scales used for neonatal skin injury. Secondly, this review will determine the (i) characteristics of severity scales such as ordinal or categorical groupings and (ii) assessment of scale validation for population. Methods This scoping review will utilise the PRISMA-ScR framework and the 2015 Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The electronic medical databases chosen are PubMed, CINAHL, COCHRANE Central and Scopus. Publications from within the last 20 years will be included to ensure the scales and the neonatal population reflect the timepoint when neonatal skin care became a safety and quality outcome as recognised by international seminal works.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿皮肤损伤量表:叙述综合方案的范围审查
背景:自20世纪80年代以来,机械性皮肤损伤一直是新生儿并发症,但许多因素影响其评估,特别是损伤严重程度的评估。虽然在澳大利亚有一个单一的严重程度和分类系统用于评估成人压力伤害,但没有针对新生儿的伤害评估标准。不幸的是,新生儿经常遭受皮肤损伤,虽然与成人损伤有一些相似之处,但新生儿皮肤的成熟使成人损伤量表的应用受到质疑。此外,目前使用了几种严重程度系统,因此很难比较皮肤损伤预防或管理策略的结果。目的本综述将探讨用于新生儿皮肤损伤的严重程度量表。其次,本综述将确定(i)严重性量表的特征,如顺序或分类分组,以及(ii)评估总体的量表有效性。方法本次范围审查将利用PRISMA-ScR框架和2015年乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法。选择的电子医学数据库有PubMed、CINAHL、COCHRANE Central和Scopus。将包括过去20年内的出版物,以确保量表和新生儿人口反映了国际开创性工作认可的新生儿皮肤护理成为安全和质量结果的时间点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Required wound care content for nursing curricula in Australia: a Delphi study Characteristics of United States nursing homes with high percentages of stage 2–4 pressure injuries among high-risk nursing home residents with obesity Investigating cognition in people with diabetes-related foot ulcers: a study protocol The impact of venous leg ulcers on quality of life Aged care and education - critical topics in wound management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1