The Powers and “Popular Religion” in Pompeii and Paul’s Letter to the Romans

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Horizons in Biblical Theology Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1163/18712207-12341460
S. Ryan
{"title":"The Powers and “Popular Religion” in Pompeii and Paul’s Letter to the Romans","authors":"S. Ryan","doi":"10.1163/18712207-12341460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nReaders of Romans debate how to understand Paul’s language related to sin and death. Are sin and death ontological powers that operate in the human realm? Does Paul use figurative language to describe abstract concepts? Rarely do scholars consider material evidence and popular ideas as sources for addressing such questions. This essay considers archaeological findings from Pompeii as an additional voice in the conversation for understanding life in a first-century Roman context and Paul’s framing of sin and death in Romans. The essay first considers philosophical critiques of popular practices and then turns to material remains to demonstrate that many thought suprahuman forces to be at work in the world. With the Vesuvian evidence in view, understanding sin and death among powers that can influence human life emerges as a plausible interpretation. Paul’s personal language thus resonates with popular beliefs in the Greco-Roman context and reframes them in significant ways.","PeriodicalId":40398,"journal":{"name":"Horizons in Biblical Theology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizons in Biblical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18712207-12341460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Readers of Romans debate how to understand Paul’s language related to sin and death. Are sin and death ontological powers that operate in the human realm? Does Paul use figurative language to describe abstract concepts? Rarely do scholars consider material evidence and popular ideas as sources for addressing such questions. This essay considers archaeological findings from Pompeii as an additional voice in the conversation for understanding life in a first-century Roman context and Paul’s framing of sin and death in Romans. The essay first considers philosophical critiques of popular practices and then turns to material remains to demonstrate that many thought suprahuman forces to be at work in the world. With the Vesuvian evidence in view, understanding sin and death among powers that can influence human life emerges as a plausible interpretation. Paul’s personal language thus resonates with popular beliefs in the Greco-Roman context and reframes them in significant ways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
庞贝的权力和“民间宗教”以及保罗给罗马人的信
罗马人的读者争论如何理解保罗关于罪和死亡的语言。罪和死亡是在人类领域运作的本体论力量吗?保罗用比喻的语言来描述抽象概念吗?学者们很少将物证和流行观点视为解决此类问题的来源。本文认为,庞贝城的考古发现是理解一世纪罗马背景下的生活以及保罗在罗马人中对罪与死的框架的对话中的一个额外声音。本文首先考虑了对流行实践的哲学批判,然后转向材料遗存,以证明世界上许多思想超人类的力量在起作用。鉴于维苏威人的证据,理解可以影响人类生活的力量中的罪和死亡是一种合理的解释。因此,保罗的个人语言与希腊罗马时代的流行信仰产生了共鸣,并以重要的方式重新定义了这些信仰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
‘A Chronicle of the Rebellion in Jamaica’: Pseudobiblical Style and Jamaican Proto-nationalism The Sons of Esau and Lot: Reevaluating National States in Deuteronomy 2 Willingness to Die and the Gift of Life, written by Paul K.-K. Cho “The King Whom Yahweh Your God Chooses”: Deuteronomic Kingship in a World of Sacral Kingship “You Shall Not Marry a Canaanite!” Endogamy, (Canaanite) Exogamy and Theology in Genesis 12–50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1