Book Review: TikTok: Creativity and Culture in Short Video by D. Bondy Valdovinos Kaye

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES China Information Pub Date : 2023-02-24 DOI:10.1177/0920203X231156977e
David Craig
{"title":"Book Review: TikTok: Creativity and Culture in Short Video by D. Bondy Valdovinos Kaye","authors":"David Craig","doi":"10.1177/0920203X231156977e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"views cannot fully address this issue. The interview data given in the book only address how the audience make sense of the televised gendered representation. This is mostly evident in the audience’s views on All Is Well (都挺好, dir. Jian Chuanhe, 2019, pp. 160–5) and The Story of Yanxi Palace (延禧攻略, dir. Hui Kaidong and Wen Deguang, 2018, pp. 170–8) – the interview statements add little to our prior knowledge of how the public actually develop ‘technology of the self’ via seeing gendered representation on television. Furthermore, the interview quotes are also quite similar to the comments one finds on Chinese social media. Finally, although the book provides an excellent genealogical analysis of the emergence of masculine traits embodied by bossy CEO (Chapter 4) and little fresh meat (Chapter 6), it does not invest the same academic vigour in introducing the gendered traits of foreigners (Chapter 5) or the supreme heroines (Chapter 7). Notwithstanding these weaknesses, this book overall is a thoughtful, intriguing, and important analysis of Chinese television. We highly recommend it to students, scholars, and the public interested in critical media studies.","PeriodicalId":45809,"journal":{"name":"China Information","volume":"37 1","pages":"152 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Information","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X231156977e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

views cannot fully address this issue. The interview data given in the book only address how the audience make sense of the televised gendered representation. This is mostly evident in the audience’s views on All Is Well (都挺好, dir. Jian Chuanhe, 2019, pp. 160–5) and The Story of Yanxi Palace (延禧攻略, dir. Hui Kaidong and Wen Deguang, 2018, pp. 170–8) – the interview statements add little to our prior knowledge of how the public actually develop ‘technology of the self’ via seeing gendered representation on television. Furthermore, the interview quotes are also quite similar to the comments one finds on Chinese social media. Finally, although the book provides an excellent genealogical analysis of the emergence of masculine traits embodied by bossy CEO (Chapter 4) and little fresh meat (Chapter 6), it does not invest the same academic vigour in introducing the gendered traits of foreigners (Chapter 5) or the supreme heroines (Chapter 7). Notwithstanding these weaknesses, this book overall is a thoughtful, intriguing, and important analysis of Chinese television. We highly recommend it to students, scholars, and the public interested in critical media studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:D.Bondy Valdovinos Kaye的《TikTok:短视频中的创造力与文化》
观点不能完全解决这个问题。书中给出的采访数据只涉及观众如何理解电视上的性别代表。这一点在观众对《一切都好》的看法中最为明显(都挺好, 导演简传和,2019,第160-5页)和《延禧宫记》(延禧攻略, 许凯东和温德光,2018,第170-8页)-采访陈述几乎没有增加我们之前对公众如何通过在电视上看到性别代表来发展“自我技术”的了解。此外,这些采访语录也与人们在中国社交媒体上看到的评论非常相似。最后,尽管这本书对专横的首席执行官(第4章)和小鲜肉(第6章)所体现的男性特征的出现进行了出色的谱系分析,但它在介绍外国人(第5章)或最高女英雄(第7章)的性别特征方面并没有投入同样的学术精力。尽管存在这些弱点,但这本书总体上是对中国电视的深思熟虑、引人入胜的重要分析。我们强烈推荐给对批判性媒体研究感兴趣的学生、学者和公众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Information
China Information AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: China Information presents timely and in-depth analyses of major developments in contemporary China and overseas Chinese communities in the areas of politics, economics, law, ecology, culture, and society, including literature and the arts. China Information pays special attention to views and areas that do not receive sufficient attention in the mainstream discourse on contemporary China. It encourages discussion and debate between different academic traditions, offers a platform to express controversial and dissenting opinions, and promotes research that is historically sensitive and contemporarily relevant.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: From Missionary Education to Confucius Institutes: Historical Reflections on Sino-American Cultural Exchange by Jeff Kyong-McClain and Joseph Tse-Hei Lee (eds) The operations of contemporary Han Chinese privilege. Managing the Power of Images: Environmental NGOs, Networked Public Screens, and ‘Interactive’ Image Events in China The generalized sigmoidal quantile function. Ritual narratives of infrastructure ceremonies: Time, demands, and relations in modern Chinese history
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1