A Hybrid Response Surface Methodology and Multi-Criteria Decision Making model to investigate the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with Phenolic antioxidant additive and Biodiesel Blends

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Energy Resources Technology-transactions of The Asme Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1115/1.4056939
Vijay Kumar, A. Choudhary
{"title":"A Hybrid Response Surface Methodology and Multi-Criteria Decision Making model to investigate the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with Phenolic antioxidant additive and Biodiesel Blends","authors":"Vijay Kumar, A. Choudhary","doi":"10.1115/1.4056939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Overconsumption of fossil fuels has accelerated global warming and raised environmental air pollution levels. Recent studies have looked into the potential use of alternative, environmentally friendly fuels for diesel engines in response to the rising need for oil. Biodiesel is a renewable alternative fuel that is environmentally friendly. The significant increase in NOx emissions is the most notable disadvantage of biodiesel. This study examined the effect of antioxidant-treated Jatropha biodiesel on the performance and exhaust emission parameters of a VCR diesel engine. For this study; diesel, Jatropha biodiesel (B30) and phenolic antioxidant additive diphenylamine at 100 ppm is added by weight to the B30 blend named as B30+DPA, was used. A hybrid RSM and MCDM approaches such as AHP and COPRAS technique has been used to produce a sustainable model to derive the optimum models for output responses. From experimental findings, the antioxidant significantly reduced NOx emission. The inclusion of DPA to tested blend lowered the average NOx emissions and BSFC by 7.4% and 7.8% respectively as compared with B30. Also, the BMEP of B30+DPA is 5.01% and 0.38% higher than diesel and B30, CPMax is 0.9% higher than B30, but 3.4% lower than diesel. The optimal setting of engine input parameters is recorded at CR of 15, 7.5% EGR-HOT and 12 kg load, for optimum BP, BMEP, BSFC, CPMax and NOx emissions. Therefore, the B30+DPA blend is suitable for enhancing diesel engine performance and minimizing exhaust emissions.","PeriodicalId":15676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Resources Technology-transactions of The Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Resources Technology-transactions of The Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Overconsumption of fossil fuels has accelerated global warming and raised environmental air pollution levels. Recent studies have looked into the potential use of alternative, environmentally friendly fuels for diesel engines in response to the rising need for oil. Biodiesel is a renewable alternative fuel that is environmentally friendly. The significant increase in NOx emissions is the most notable disadvantage of biodiesel. This study examined the effect of antioxidant-treated Jatropha biodiesel on the performance and exhaust emission parameters of a VCR diesel engine. For this study; diesel, Jatropha biodiesel (B30) and phenolic antioxidant additive diphenylamine at 100 ppm is added by weight to the B30 blend named as B30+DPA, was used. A hybrid RSM and MCDM approaches such as AHP and COPRAS technique has been used to produce a sustainable model to derive the optimum models for output responses. From experimental findings, the antioxidant significantly reduced NOx emission. The inclusion of DPA to tested blend lowered the average NOx emissions and BSFC by 7.4% and 7.8% respectively as compared with B30. Also, the BMEP of B30+DPA is 5.01% and 0.38% higher than diesel and B30, CPMax is 0.9% higher than B30, but 3.4% lower than diesel. The optimal setting of engine input parameters is recorded at CR of 15, 7.5% EGR-HOT and 12 kg load, for optimum BP, BMEP, BSFC, CPMax and NOx emissions. Therefore, the B30+DPA blend is suitable for enhancing diesel engine performance and minimizing exhaust emissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酚类抗氧化添加剂和生物柴油混合燃料柴油机性能和排放特性的混合响应面方法和多准则决策模型
化石燃料的过度消耗加速了全球变暖,并提高了环境空气污染水平。最近的研究探讨了柴油发动机使用替代性环保燃料的可能性,以应对日益增长的石油需求。生物柴油是一种环保的可再生替代燃料。氮氧化物排放量的显著增加是生物柴油最显著的缺点。本研究考察了抗氧化处理的麻疯树生物柴油对VCR柴油机性能和废气排放参数的影响。对于本研究;将100重量ppm的柴油、麻风树生物柴油(B30)和酚类抗氧化剂添加剂二苯胺添加到命名为B30+DPA的B30共混物中。RSM和MCDM的混合方法,如AHP和COPRAS技术,已被用于生成可持续模型,以导出输出响应的最佳模型。从实验结果来看,抗氧化剂显著降低了NOx排放。与B30相比,在测试混合物中加入DPA可将平均NOx排放量和BSFC分别降低7.4%和7.8%。此外,B30+DPA的BMEP比柴油高5.01%和0.38%,B30,CPMax比B30高0.9%,但比柴油低3.4%。发动机输入参数的最佳设置记录在CR为15、7.5%EGR-HOT和12 kg负载时,以获得最佳BP、BMEP、BSFC、CPMax和NOx排放。因此,B30+DPA混合动力适用于提高柴油发动机性能并最大限度地减少废气排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
30.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Specific areas of importance including, but not limited to: Fundamentals of thermodynamics such as energy, entropy and exergy, laws of thermodynamics; Thermoeconomics; Alternative and renewable energy sources; Internal combustion engines; (Geo) thermal energy storage and conversion systems; Fundamental combustion of fuels; Energy resource recovery from biomass and solid wastes; Carbon capture; Land and offshore wells drilling; Production and reservoir engineering;, Economics of energy resource exploitation
期刊最新文献
Modeling and influence factors analysis of refueling emissions for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles Structure optimization and performance evaluation of downhole oil-water separation tools: a novel hydrocyclone Effects of Trapped Gas in Fracture-Pore Carbonate Reservoirs Shale Oil-water Two-phase Flow Simulation based on Pore Network Modeling Investigation on the effects of nanorefrigerants in a combined cycle of ejector refrigeration cycle and Kalina cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1