Dana O. Sarnak , Elizabeth Gummerson , Shannon N. Wood , Funmilola M. OlaOlorun , Simon Peter Sebina Kibira , Linnea A. Zimmerman , Philip Anglewicz
{"title":"Prevalence and characteristics of covert contraceptive use in the Performance Monitoring for Action multi-country study","authors":"Dana O. Sarnak , Elizabeth Gummerson , Shannon N. Wood , Funmilola M. OlaOlorun , Simon Peter Sebina Kibira , Linnea A. Zimmerman , Philip Anglewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>A more nuanced understanding of contributors to covert contraceptive use remains critical to protecting covert users and reducing its necessity. This study aimed to examine the overall prevalence of covert use, and sociodemographic characteristics associated with covert vs overt use across multiple geographies in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) is one of the few nationally representative surveys that measures covert use across socially diverse contexts via a direct question. Utilizing PMA 2019–2020 phase 1 data from Burkina Faso, Côte D'Ivoire, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC; Kinshasa and Kongo Central regions), Uganda, Nigeria (Kano and Lagos), Niger, and Rajasthan, we estimated overall prevalence of covert use. We conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regressions for 6 sites, comparing the odds of covert use with overt use among users of contraception by sociodemographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Covert use ranged from 1% in Rajasthan to 16% in Burkina Faso. Marital status was the only sociodemographic characteristic consistently associated with type of use across sites. Specifically, polygynous marriage (compared to monogamous) increased odds of using covertly, ranging from adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.7] in Burkina Faso to 6.2 [95% CI 2.9–13.3] in Kinshasa. Unmarried women with partners or boyfriends were also more likely to be using covertly compared with their monogamously married counterparts in all sites (aORs ranged from 2.2 [95% CI 1.0–4.7] in Uganda to 4.4 [95% CI 1.7–11.0] in Kinshasa).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Understanding factors associated with covert use has programmatic and policy implications for women's reproductive autonomy.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Covert use is a common phenomenon across most sites, representing a small but programmatically important contingent of users. Family planning providers and programs must protect access to and maintain privacy of reproductive services to this population, but should also focus on creating interventions and environments that support overt use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151622000065/pdfft?md5=3007353004d54d90231c3df2822ff833&pid=1-s2.0-S2590151622000065-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151622000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Objectives
A more nuanced understanding of contributors to covert contraceptive use remains critical to protecting covert users and reducing its necessity. This study aimed to examine the overall prevalence of covert use, and sociodemographic characteristics associated with covert vs overt use across multiple geographies in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.
Study Design
Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) is one of the few nationally representative surveys that measures covert use across socially diverse contexts via a direct question. Utilizing PMA 2019–2020 phase 1 data from Burkina Faso, Côte D'Ivoire, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC; Kinshasa and Kongo Central regions), Uganda, Nigeria (Kano and Lagos), Niger, and Rajasthan, we estimated overall prevalence of covert use. We conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regressions for 6 sites, comparing the odds of covert use with overt use among users of contraception by sociodemographic characteristics.
Results
Covert use ranged from 1% in Rajasthan to 16% in Burkina Faso. Marital status was the only sociodemographic characteristic consistently associated with type of use across sites. Specifically, polygynous marriage (compared to monogamous) increased odds of using covertly, ranging from adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.7] in Burkina Faso to 6.2 [95% CI 2.9–13.3] in Kinshasa. Unmarried women with partners or boyfriends were also more likely to be using covertly compared with their monogamously married counterparts in all sites (aORs ranged from 2.2 [95% CI 1.0–4.7] in Uganda to 4.4 [95% CI 1.7–11.0] in Kinshasa).
Conclusion
Understanding factors associated with covert use has programmatic and policy implications for women's reproductive autonomy.
Implications
Covert use is a common phenomenon across most sites, representing a small but programmatically important contingent of users. Family planning providers and programs must protect access to and maintain privacy of reproductive services to this population, but should also focus on creating interventions and environments that support overt use.
目的更细致地了解隐蔽避孕措施使用的原因对于保护隐蔽使用者和减少其必要性至关重要。本研究旨在调查撒哈拉以南非洲和亚洲多个地区隐蔽用药的总体流行情况,以及与隐蔽用药和公开用药相关的社会人口特征。研究设计行动绩效监测(PMA)是少数具有全国代表性的调查之一,通过直接问题来衡量社会不同背景下的隐蔽使用。利用来自布基纳法索、Côte科特迪瓦、肯尼亚、刚果民主共和国(DRC);金沙萨和刚果中部地区),乌干达,尼日利亚(卡诺和拉各斯),尼日尔和拉贾斯坦邦,我们估计了隐蔽使用的总体流行率。我们对6个地点进行了双变量分析和多变量logistic回归,通过社会人口学特征比较避孕使用者中隐蔽使用和公开使用的几率。结果隐蔽使用范围从拉贾斯坦邦的1%到布基纳法索的16%不等。婚姻状况是唯一与网站使用类型一致的社会人口学特征。具体而言,一夫多妻制婚姻(与一夫一妻制相比)增加了秘密使用的几率,调整后的优势比(aOR)在布基纳法索为1.8[95%可信区间(CI) 1.2-2.7],在金沙萨为6.2 [95% CI 2.9-13.3]。与一夫一妻制的已婚女性相比,有伴侣或男友的未婚女性也更有可能秘密使用大麻(比值比从乌干达的2.2 [95% CI 1.0-4.7]到金沙萨的4.4 [95% CI 1.7-11.0]不等)。结论了解与隐蔽使用相关的因素对妇女生殖自主具有规划和政策意义。隐含使用是大多数站点的常见现象,代表了一小部分但在程序上很重要的用户。计划生育提供者和项目必须保护这一人群获得生殖服务的机会并维护其隐私,但也应侧重于创造支持公开使用的干预措施和环境。