Applying a social-ecological approach to enhancing provision of public goods through agriculture and forestry activities across the European Union

IF 0.9 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Studies in Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI:10.7896/J.1721
Thilo Nigmann, T. Dax, G. Hovorka
{"title":"Applying a social-ecological approach to enhancing provision of public goods through agriculture and forestry activities across the European Union","authors":"Thilo Nigmann, T. Dax, G. Hovorka","doi":"10.7896/J.1721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public goods provided by different land management practices in European regions have increasingly attained attention in agricultural policy debates. By focusing on the social-ecological systems (SES) framework the systemic interrelations (e.g. drivers, resources, actors, governance regimes and policy impact) in land management across several case studies in various topographical and climatic conditions across ten European Union Member States is provided. The analysis of agricultural and forestry systems reveals a wide range of factors that drive the provision of ‘ecologically and socially beneficial outcomes’ (ESBOs). The respective influencing aspects cannot be reduced to market forces and policy support, but have to address simultaneously the pivotal role of social, cultural and institutional drivers as well. In particular, the tight interplay between public policies and private initiatives, and market mechanisms and societal appreciation of public goods delivery have shown to be the indispensable clue for understanding the relationship shaping the level of provision of public goods. Comparative analyses support the strong reliance on context, history, types of regions and differentiation of management systems which might be used for recommendations in the current debate on the future Common Agricultural Policy.","PeriodicalId":44547,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","volume":"120 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7896/J.1721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Public goods provided by different land management practices in European regions have increasingly attained attention in agricultural policy debates. By focusing on the social-ecological systems (SES) framework the systemic interrelations (e.g. drivers, resources, actors, governance regimes and policy impact) in land management across several case studies in various topographical and climatic conditions across ten European Union Member States is provided. The analysis of agricultural and forestry systems reveals a wide range of factors that drive the provision of ‘ecologically and socially beneficial outcomes’ (ESBOs). The respective influencing aspects cannot be reduced to market forces and policy support, but have to address simultaneously the pivotal role of social, cultural and institutional drivers as well. In particular, the tight interplay between public policies and private initiatives, and market mechanisms and societal appreciation of public goods delivery have shown to be the indispensable clue for understanding the relationship shaping the level of provision of public goods. Comparative analyses support the strong reliance on context, history, types of regions and differentiation of management systems which might be used for recommendations in the current debate on the future Common Agricultural Policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用社会生态方法,通过整个欧洲联盟的农业和林业活动加强公共产品的供应
欧洲区域不同土地管理做法提供的公共产品在农业政策辩论中越来越受到关注。通过关注社会生态系统(SES)框架,提供了十个欧盟成员国在不同地形和气候条件下的几个案例研究中土地管理的系统性相互关系(如驱动因素、资源、行为者、治理制度和政策影响)。对农业和林业系统的分析揭示了推动提供“生态和社会有益成果”(ESBO)的广泛因素。各自的影响方面不能归结为市场力量和政策支持,而必须同时解决社会、文化和制度驱动因素的关键作用。特别是,公共政策和私人倡议、市场机制和社会对公共产品交付的赞赏之间的紧密相互作用已被证明是理解形成公共产品提供水平的关系的不可或缺的线索。比较分析支持对背景、历史、区域类型和管理系统差异的强烈依赖,这些可能用于在当前关于未来共同农业政策的辩论中提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Agricultural Economics
Studies in Agricultural Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Food security in the world: Disparities and opportunities by country income levels Consumer segmentation based on commitment to local products in Hungary Effects of digitalisation on food safety Do EIP-AGRI operational groups improve farmers’ performance? An analysis of treatment effects in intensive farming systems Socio-economic Implications of Banning Conventional Farrowing Crates in EU Pig Farming: A CAPRI-based Scenario Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1