Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in stone surgery: A multi-centre study of patient experience of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2022-11-18 DOI:10.1177/20514158221135692
W. Thompson, S. Tolofari, B. Starmer, J. Broome, H. Garrod, K. Agarwal, Kee Y Wong, Z. Panayi, K. Hughes, M. Iskander, S. Javed, P. Kelly, H. Lazarowicz, R. Calvert
{"title":"Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in stone surgery: A multi-centre study of patient experience of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)","authors":"W. Thompson, S. Tolofari, B. Starmer, J. Broome, H. Garrod, K. Agarwal, Kee Y Wong, Z. Panayi, K. Hughes, M. Iskander, S. Javed, P. Kelly, H. Lazarowicz, R. Calvert","doi":"10.1177/20514158221135692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients with symptomatic renal stone disease treated by flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) and shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) Historically, surgical outcomes are measured by surgeon-specific outcomes such as ‘stone-free rates’. More recently, there is increasing emphasis on PROMs to ascertain a patient’s perspective of their own surgical outcome. Despite this, the literature in reference to renal stone-specific PROMs following stone treatment remains limited. Data were collected in a prospective multi-centre study. Patients undergoing fURS or SWL were asked to complete the validated Cambridge Renal Stone Patient Reported Outcome Measure ( CReSP) on the day of initial treatment and at weeks 1, 6 and 12 post-operatively. Data were collected for 119 patients. Three were excluded as stone metric and demographic details were incomplete. Sixty underwent SWL and 56 underwent fURS. Median stone size was 7.52 mm. There were no significant differences in baseline PROM scores between the treatment groups. At 1 week, the PROM scores were significantly higher in the fURS group compared to SWL (27.40 ± 0.85sd versus 22.51 ± 1.07sd; p < 0.05). However, at 6 and 12 weeks, the PROM scores were significantly lower in the fURS group (18.51 ± 2.27sd versus 23.67 ± 1.30sd; p < 0.05) and (17.01 ± 2.29sd versus 22.49 ± 1.49sd; p < 0.05), respectively. By week 12, overall scores for anxiety and social factors were more favourable in the fURS cohort. Our study suggests that fURS is associated with a short-lived increase in morbidity in comparison with SWL, which may be due to ureteric stenting in the majority of patients post-operatively. However, fURS patients appear to report significantly better PROM scores in the longer term. This appears to be associated with more favourable anxiety and social factor scoring over the treatment period. Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221135692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients with symptomatic renal stone disease treated by flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) and shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) Historically, surgical outcomes are measured by surgeon-specific outcomes such as ‘stone-free rates’. More recently, there is increasing emphasis on PROMs to ascertain a patient’s perspective of their own surgical outcome. Despite this, the literature in reference to renal stone-specific PROMs following stone treatment remains limited. Data were collected in a prospective multi-centre study. Patients undergoing fURS or SWL were asked to complete the validated Cambridge Renal Stone Patient Reported Outcome Measure ( CReSP) on the day of initial treatment and at weeks 1, 6 and 12 post-operatively. Data were collected for 119 patients. Three were excluded as stone metric and demographic details were incomplete. Sixty underwent SWL and 56 underwent fURS. Median stone size was 7.52 mm. There were no significant differences in baseline PROM scores between the treatment groups. At 1 week, the PROM scores were significantly higher in the fURS group compared to SWL (27.40 ± 0.85sd versus 22.51 ± 1.07sd; p < 0.05). However, at 6 and 12 weeks, the PROM scores were significantly lower in the fURS group (18.51 ± 2.27sd versus 23.67 ± 1.30sd; p < 0.05) and (17.01 ± 2.29sd versus 22.49 ± 1.49sd; p < 0.05), respectively. By week 12, overall scores for anxiety and social factors were more favourable in the fURS cohort. Our study suggests that fURS is associated with a short-lived increase in morbidity in comparison with SWL, which may be due to ureteric stenting in the majority of patients post-operatively. However, fURS patients appear to report significantly better PROM scores in the longer term. This appears to be associated with more favourable anxiety and social factor scoring over the treatment period. Not applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结石手术中患者报告的预后指标(PROMs):一项多中心研究:柔性输尿管镜(fURS)与体外冲击波碎石(SWL)的患者体验
为了比较通过弹性输尿管肾镜(fURS)和冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗的症状性肾结石患者的患者报告结果测量(PROM),历史上,手术结果是通过外科医生的特定结果来测量的,如“无结石率”。最近,人们越来越重视胎膜早破,以确定患者对自己手术结果的看法。尽管如此,关于结石治疗后肾结石特异性PROM的文献仍然有限。数据是在一项前瞻性多中心研究中收集的。要求接受fURS或SWL的患者在初次治疗当天以及术后第1、6和12周完成经验证的剑桥肾结石患者报告结果测量(CReSP)。收集了119名患者的数据。三个被排除在外,因为结石指标和人口统计细节不完整。60例接受SWL,56例接受fURS。中值石材尺寸为7.52 治疗组之间的PROM基线评分没有显著差异。在1 与SWL相比,fURS组的PROM评分明显更高(27.40 ± 0.85sd与22.51 ± 1.07sd;p < 0.05)。然而,在6和12 周时,fURS组的PROM评分明显较低(18.51 ± 2.27sd与23.67 ± 1.30sd;p < 0.05)和(17.01 ± 2.29天与22.49天 ± 1.49sd;p < 0.05)。到第12周,fURS队列中焦虑和社会因素的总分更为有利。我们的研究表明,与SWL相比,fURS与发病率的短暂增加有关,这可能是由于大多数患者术后输尿管支架植入所致。然而,从长远来看,fURS患者的胎膜早破评分明显更好。这似乎与治疗期间更有利的焦虑和社会因素评分有关。不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1