A Loose Affiliation of Alleluias

C. Oram, Keir GoGwilt
{"title":"A Loose Affiliation of Alleluias","authors":"C. Oram, Keir GoGwilt","doi":"10.52214/cm.v108i108.7921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is written from our perspectives as a performer and a composer, focusing on our violin concerto, “a loose affiliation of alleluias”, which we created and premiered in 2019. Making this concerto was an exercise in excavating the material histories that guide our creative practice. Our purpose in doing so was to work towards a clear and necessarily complex appraisal of how our current practices are motivated by, and reproduce, historically-determined knowledge, authority, and cultural attitudes. We think through our own reproductions of historical knowledge via Ben Spatz’s exegesis of “technique”, and via Edward Said’s notion of “affiliations” as the networks which build up cultural associations and cultural authority. With this theoretical frame, we contextualize some of the musical techniques and tropes engaged in our concerto—for instance polyphony, ornamentation, and the concerto soloist as heroic subject.  \nWe contextualize our reflections next to critical positions staked circumscribed by what Ben Piekut calls “elite avantgardism”—an analytical category which we see ourselves as operating within. We discuss, for instance, the critical gestures of musical modernism which (per Adorno’s analysis) conspicuously arrest and negate historical musical grammars and logics – and yet continue to reproduce its structuring values. In our concluding statements we gesture towards some of the pedagogical implications of this work, considering how creative practice can be leveraged to re-appraise the histories shaping our practices of composition, improvisation, and performance.","PeriodicalId":34202,"journal":{"name":"Current Musicology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/cm.v108i108.7921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is written from our perspectives as a performer and a composer, focusing on our violin concerto, “a loose affiliation of alleluias”, which we created and premiered in 2019. Making this concerto was an exercise in excavating the material histories that guide our creative practice. Our purpose in doing so was to work towards a clear and necessarily complex appraisal of how our current practices are motivated by, and reproduce, historically-determined knowledge, authority, and cultural attitudes. We think through our own reproductions of historical knowledge via Ben Spatz’s exegesis of “technique”, and via Edward Said’s notion of “affiliations” as the networks which build up cultural associations and cultural authority. With this theoretical frame, we contextualize some of the musical techniques and tropes engaged in our concerto—for instance polyphony, ornamentation, and the concerto soloist as heroic subject.  We contextualize our reflections next to critical positions staked circumscribed by what Ben Piekut calls “elite avantgardism”—an analytical category which we see ourselves as operating within. We discuss, for instance, the critical gestures of musical modernism which (per Adorno’s analysis) conspicuously arrest and negate historical musical grammars and logics – and yet continue to reproduce its structuring values. In our concluding statements we gesture towards some of the pedagogical implications of this work, considering how creative practice can be leveraged to re-appraise the histories shaping our practices of composition, improvisation, and performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈利路亚的松散从属关系
这篇文章是从我们作为表演者和作曲家的角度来写的,重点是我们在2019年创作并首演的小提琴协奏曲“哈利路亚斯的松散联系”。制作这首协奏曲是在挖掘指导我们创作实践的物质历史的练习。我们这样做的目的是为了对我们当前的实践是如何被历史决定的知识、权威和文化态度所激励和复制的进行一个清晰而必要的复杂评估。我们通过本·斯帕茨(Ben Spatz)对“技术”(technique)的诠释,以及爱德华·赛义德(Edward Said)的“隶属关系”(affiliation)概念,通过建立文化协会和文化权威的网络,来思考我们自己对历史知识的再现。在这个理论框架下,我们将协奏曲中涉及的一些音乐技巧和修辞置于语境中,例如复调、装饰和协奏曲独奏者作为英雄主体。我们将自己的思考置于本·皮库特所称的“精英先锋主义”(一种我们认为自己在其中运作的分析范畴)所限定的批判立场的背景下。例如,我们讨论了音乐现代主义的批判姿态(根据阿多诺的分析),它明显地逮捕和否定了历史上的音乐语法和逻辑,但仍在继续再现其结构价值。在我们的结论性陈述中,我们指出了这项工作的一些教学意义,考虑如何利用创造性实践来重新评估塑造我们的作曲、即兴创作和表演实践的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Queen of the Violin Emotional Storms, Passion and Melancholy when Symphonic Music is Legitimated as an Emotional Resource Valuing Whiteness: The Presumed Innocence of Musical Truth Reverse Extensions and Multi-Layered Experiences of Harmony in Drake’s Harmonic Loops Dub Writing in Marcia Douglas’ The Marvellous Equations of the Dread: A Novel in Bass Riddim
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1