Endovascular treatment of type „A“ and type „B“ dissection of the aorta

Z. Stankov, I. Petrov, D. Boychev
{"title":"Endovascular treatment of type „A“ and type „B“ dissection of the aorta","authors":"Z. Stankov, I. Petrov, D. Boychev","doi":"10.3897/bgcardio.28.e89568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the period from March 2014 to May 2018, endovascular treatment of aortic dissection type A and type B was carried out in a total of 70 patients. Patients were divided into two groups, aortic dissection type A (14 patients) and type B (56 patients), a group-by-group descriptive analysis was conducted, and then a comparison was done between the two patient groups.  The aim of the study was to establish the effective use of endovascular treatment in type A and type B aorta dissection. As a result of the survey, data on the demographic characteristics and risk profile of these patients are accumulated for the first time in Bulgaria. Endovascular treatment options for the treatment of aortic dissection type A and type B, as well as malperfusion syndrome, are examined, demonstrating their effectiveness and safety. As a result of the study, it is proven that endovascular treatment in aortic dissection type A and type B leads to a significant increase in the size of the true lumen and reduction of the false lumen, which leads to an improvement in perfusion and reduces the risk of developing an aneurysm and rupture.  The presence of endoleak and persistent communication between the false and the real lumen are the most common causes of re-intervention, such as endovascular options are most often the first line for their dealing and are proven to be effective and safe.  Treatment of dissection of the aorta type A and B is not a one-time act, but requires periodic diagnostic control and, if necessary, surfery and/or endovascular corrections of the complications that have arisen.","PeriodicalId":33976,"journal":{"name":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/bgcardio.28.e89568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the period from March 2014 to May 2018, endovascular treatment of aortic dissection type A and type B was carried out in a total of 70 patients. Patients were divided into two groups, aortic dissection type A (14 patients) and type B (56 patients), a group-by-group descriptive analysis was conducted, and then a comparison was done between the two patient groups.  The aim of the study was to establish the effective use of endovascular treatment in type A and type B aorta dissection. As a result of the survey, data on the demographic characteristics and risk profile of these patients are accumulated for the first time in Bulgaria. Endovascular treatment options for the treatment of aortic dissection type A and type B, as well as malperfusion syndrome, are examined, demonstrating their effectiveness and safety. As a result of the study, it is proven that endovascular treatment in aortic dissection type A and type B leads to a significant increase in the size of the true lumen and reduction of the false lumen, which leads to an improvement in perfusion and reduces the risk of developing an aneurysm and rupture.  The presence of endoleak and persistent communication between the false and the real lumen are the most common causes of re-intervention, such as endovascular options are most often the first line for their dealing and are proven to be effective and safe.  Treatment of dissection of the aorta type A and B is not a one-time act, but requires periodic diagnostic control and, if necessary, surfery and/or endovascular corrections of the complications that have arisen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A型和B型主动脉夹层的血管内治疗
2014年3月至2018年5月,共对70例A型和B型主动脉夹层患者进行了血管内治疗。将患者分为A型(14例)和B型(56例)两组,逐组进行描述性分析,并对两组患者进行比较。本研究的目的是建立血管内治疗在A型和B型主动脉夹层中的有效应用。调查的结果是,保加利亚首次积累了关于这些患者的人口特征和风险概况的数据。对A型和B型主动脉夹层以及灌注不良综合征的血管内治疗方案进行了检查,证明了其有效性和安全性。研究结果证明,a型和B型主动脉夹层的血管内治疗导致真腔的大小明显增加,假腔的减少,从而改善灌注,降低动脉瘤发生和破裂的风险。内漏的存在和假腔与真腔之间的持续通信是再次干预的最常见原因,例如血管内选择通常是治疗的第一线,并且被证明是有效和安全的。A型和B型主动脉夹层的治疗不是一次性的,而是需要定期的诊断控制,必要时,对已出现的并发症进行手术和/或血管内矫正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contemporary approach to st elevation myocardial infarction in very young Long term effect of renal denervation on 24 hour abpm blood pressure variability and blood pressure load parameters Blood pressure and hypertension in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with long duration Cardiac myxoma – two clinical cases with a different presentation Opportunistic screening for hypertension in the general population in Bulgaria: international society of hypertension may measurement month campaign
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1