Deconstructing the Metanarratives of China’s Engagement with the African Continent: African Agency and Competing Narratives

Ana Mann
{"title":"Deconstructing the Metanarratives of China’s Engagement with the African Continent: African Agency and Competing Narratives","authors":"Ana Mann","doi":"10.1177/09749284231184619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China’s relationship with the African continent has faced extensive critique over the past few decades, with most explanations broadly falling under the umbrella of three metanarratives: a ‘developing partner’, an ‘economic competitor’ or a ‘hegemonic actor’. 1 Although these labels help to make intelligible the broad intentions of China’s interaction on the continent, they unwittingly gloss over the importance of choice and agency that the African nations continue to hold in deciding their future trajectories. Essentially, deconstructing these narratives to uncover the principal characteristics of China’s approach to the African continent is the central puzzle of this study. The study further questions the extent to which the agency of African nations determines their relationship with China. This article essentially proposes that while each of the three descriptions provides an insight into the various facets of the Sino-African relationship, none of them captures the whole picture, and instead, China’s approach to the African continent is best understood by its pragmatism, which is guided by its political aspirations and economic objectives. Furthermore, the study argues that the agency of each African nation also plays a part in shaping how China’s pragmatic approach further translates into one of the three metanarratives. The article relies on an inductive exploration of its central research question and uses a variety of sources, which include data from international institutions and governments, government releases and secondary literature, amongst others.","PeriodicalId":81509,"journal":{"name":"India quarterly","volume":"79 1","pages":"318 - 335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284231184619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China’s relationship with the African continent has faced extensive critique over the past few decades, with most explanations broadly falling under the umbrella of three metanarratives: a ‘developing partner’, an ‘economic competitor’ or a ‘hegemonic actor’. 1 Although these labels help to make intelligible the broad intentions of China’s interaction on the continent, they unwittingly gloss over the importance of choice and agency that the African nations continue to hold in deciding their future trajectories. Essentially, deconstructing these narratives to uncover the principal characteristics of China’s approach to the African continent is the central puzzle of this study. The study further questions the extent to which the agency of African nations determines their relationship with China. This article essentially proposes that while each of the three descriptions provides an insight into the various facets of the Sino-African relationship, none of them captures the whole picture, and instead, China’s approach to the African continent is best understood by its pragmatism, which is guided by its political aspirations and economic objectives. Furthermore, the study argues that the agency of each African nation also plays a part in shaping how China’s pragmatic approach further translates into one of the three metanarratives. The article relies on an inductive exploration of its central research question and uses a variety of sources, which include data from international institutions and governments, government releases and secondary literature, amongst others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解构中国与非洲大陆交往的元叙事:非洲代理与竞争叙事
在过去的几十年里,中国与非洲大陆的关系面临着广泛的批评,大多数解释都大致落在三种元叙事的保护伞下:“发展伙伴”、“经济竞争对手”或“霸权行动者”。尽管这些标签有助于理解中国在非洲大陆互动的广泛意图,但它们无意中掩盖了非洲国家在决定其未来轨迹时继续持有的选择和代理的重要性。从本质上讲,解构这些叙事以揭示中国对非洲大陆的态度的主要特征是本研究的核心难题。该研究进一步质疑了非洲国家机构在多大程度上决定了它们与中国的关系。这篇文章基本上提出,虽然这三种描述中的每一种都提供了对中非关系各个方面的洞察,但它们都没有捕捉到全貌,相反,中国对非洲大陆的做法最好是通过其务实主义来理解的,这种务实主义是由其政治愿望和经济目标指导的。此外,该研究认为,每个非洲国家的机构也在塑造中国的务实方法如何进一步转化为三种元叙事之一的过程中发挥了作用。本文依赖于对其中心研究问题的归纳探索,并使用各种来源,其中包括来自国际机构和政府的数据,政府发布和二手文献等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visa-on-arrival, ECOWAS-free Mobility and the Securitisation of the Intra-African Migration in Nigeria Book review: Mustafa Suleyman and Michael Bhaskar, The Coming Wave: AI, Power and the Twenty-first Century’s Greatest Dilemma Navigating East: Exploring Northeast India’s Perspective on the Look (Act) East Policy Golden Triangle Amphetamines in India: The Indo-Bangladesh Border as an Alternative to the North-East Corridor Book review: Suranjan Das and Anita Sengupta (Eds.), Contiguity, Connectivity and Access: The Importance of the Bay of Bengal Region in Indian Foreign Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1