Relationship between the design characteristics of activity-based flexible offices and users’ perceptions of privacy and social interactions

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building Research and Information Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1080/09613218.2023.2180343
Melina Forooraghi, E. Miedema, Nina Ryd, H. Wallbaum, Maral Babapour Chafi
{"title":"Relationship between the design characteristics of activity-based flexible offices and users’ perceptions of privacy and social interactions","authors":"Melina Forooraghi, E. Miedema, Nina Ryd, H. Wallbaum, Maral Babapour Chafi","doi":"10.1080/09613218.2023.2180343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Activity-based flexible offices (AFOs) provide a variety of workspaces to meet the need for social interactions and privacy at work. This study investigates the relationship between the design characteristics of AFOs and users’ perceptions of visual and acoustic privacy and social interactions. This case study is based on post-occupancy evaluations in three AFO layouts at a public service organization in Sweden. A mixed-method approach is adopted that combines questionnaires and layout analysis. In general, the results showed that while aesthetics received the highest satisfaction scores, office functionality, task support, storage and visual and acoustic privacy received the lowest ratings. Key design characteristics for AFOs were operationalized, observed and exemplified: zone diversity, proportion, readability, spatial enclosure, sharing ratios and functionality of furniture and tools. These insights may contribute to better-informed decisions about the design characteristics that influence privacy and social interactions in AFOs.","PeriodicalId":55316,"journal":{"name":"Building Research and Information","volume":"51 1","pages":"588 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Research and Information","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2180343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Activity-based flexible offices (AFOs) provide a variety of workspaces to meet the need for social interactions and privacy at work. This study investigates the relationship between the design characteristics of AFOs and users’ perceptions of visual and acoustic privacy and social interactions. This case study is based on post-occupancy evaluations in three AFO layouts at a public service organization in Sweden. A mixed-method approach is adopted that combines questionnaires and layout analysis. In general, the results showed that while aesthetics received the highest satisfaction scores, office functionality, task support, storage and visual and acoustic privacy received the lowest ratings. Key design characteristics for AFOs were operationalized, observed and exemplified: zone diversity, proportion, readability, spatial enclosure, sharing ratios and functionality of furniture and tools. These insights may contribute to better-informed decisions about the design characteristics that influence privacy and social interactions in AFOs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活动型灵活办公室的设计特点与用户对隐私和社交的感知之间的关系
摘要基于活动的灵活办公室(AFO)提供了各种工作空间,以满足工作中的社交互动和隐私需求。本研究调查了AFO的设计特征与用户对视觉和声学隐私以及社交互动的感知之间的关系。本案例研究基于瑞典一家公共服务组织的三个AFO布局的入住后评估。采用问卷调查和布局分析相结合的混合方法。总体而言,结果显示,虽然美学的满意度得分最高,但办公室功能、任务支持、存储以及视觉和声学隐私的评分最低。对AFO的关键设计特征进行了操作、观察和举例说明:区域多样性、比例、可读性、空间封闭性、共享比例以及家具和工具的功能性。这些见解可能有助于更好地了解影响AFO隐私和社交互动的设计特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Building Research and Information
Building Research and Information 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION (BRI) is a leading international refereed journal focussed on buildings and their supporting systems. Unique to BRI is a focus on a holistic, transdisciplinary approach to buildings and the complexity of issues involving the built environment with other systems over the course of their life: planning, briefing, design, construction, occupation and use, property exchange and evaluation, maintenance, alteration and end of life. Published articles provide conceptual and evidence-based approaches which reflect the complexity and linkages between cultural, environmental, economic, social, organisational, quality of life, health, well-being, design and engineering of the built environment.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the feasibility of mobile robots for post-occupancy evaluations Indoor environmental evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine clinic – taking the treatment space as an example Towards circular renovation: a comparative review of circular economy integration in sustainable building rating systems Perceptions of volume home builders and the transition to net zero emissions housing in Australia The impact of light adjustment versus tuneable white mode on ICU staff’s circadian rhythms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1