Higher education research performance parameters classified by systems theory: antecedents for the development of assessment models

Adhi Indra Hermanu, D. Sari, M. Sondari, M. Dimyati
{"title":"Higher education research performance parameters classified by systems theory: antecedents for the development of assessment models","authors":"Adhi Indra Hermanu, D. Sari, M. Sondari, M. Dimyati","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-05-2022-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to identify and classify the parameters that construct the input, processes, output, productivity and outcome variables that affect performance. These parameters are used in the evaluation model to measure research performance in universities so that they can be used as the basis for making leadership policies both at the national and institutional levels.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe design of this research is a quantitative research method using a survey questionnaire that was sent to the heads of research institutions at universities in Indonesia. To obtain these parameters, a test for determining the value of the loading factor was used.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found that input variable parameters consisted of 10 parameters; process variable consisted of 22 parameters; output variable parameters consisted of 8 parameters; productivity variable consisted of 4 parameters; and outcome variable parameters consisted of 10 parameters.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nOne approach to obtain parameters is through systems theory, where every element that makes up the organization contributes to the achievement of goals. This study attempted to develop parameters in the performance appraisal model of systems theory-based research institutions that are adapted to trends in the direction of research in universities. These parameters are based on aspects of input, process, output, productivity and outcome.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-05-2022-0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to identify and classify the parameters that construct the input, processes, output, productivity and outcome variables that affect performance. These parameters are used in the evaluation model to measure research performance in universities so that they can be used as the basis for making leadership policies both at the national and institutional levels. Design/methodology/approach The design of this research is a quantitative research method using a survey questionnaire that was sent to the heads of research institutions at universities in Indonesia. To obtain these parameters, a test for determining the value of the loading factor was used. Findings The authors found that input variable parameters consisted of 10 parameters; process variable consisted of 22 parameters; output variable parameters consisted of 8 parameters; productivity variable consisted of 4 parameters; and outcome variable parameters consisted of 10 parameters. Originality/value One approach to obtain parameters is through systems theory, where every element that makes up the organization contributes to the achievement of goals. This study attempted to develop parameters in the performance appraisal model of systems theory-based research institutions that are adapted to trends in the direction of research in universities. These parameters are based on aspects of input, process, output, productivity and outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统论分类的高等教育研究绩效参数:评估模型发展的前提
目的本文旨在识别和分类构成影响绩效的输入、过程、输出、生产力和结果变量的参数。在评估模型中使用这些参数来衡量大学的研究绩效,以便将其用作制定国家和机构层面领导政策的基础。设计/方法论/方法本研究的设计是一种定量研究方法,使用了一份发给印度尼西亚大学研究机构负责人的调查问卷。为了获得这些参数,使用了用于确定负载因子值的测试。发现输入变量参数由10个参数组成;过程变量由22个参数组成;输出变量参数由8个参数组成;生产率变量由4个参数组成;结果变量参数由10个参数组成。独创性/价值获取参数的一种方法是通过系统理论,即构成组织的每个元素都有助于实现目标。本研究试图开发基于系统理论的研究机构绩效评估模型中的参数,以适应大学研究方向的趋势。这些参数基于投入、过程、产出、生产力和结果等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Editorial: “Digital transformation, innovation and competitiveness: some insights from Asia” Mathematical optimization of the sustainable gasoline supply chain: systematic literature review Exploring prospects of blockchain and fintech: using SLR approach Factors affecting the adoption of mobile payment services during the COVID-19 pandemic: an application of extended UTAUT2 model Developing entrepreneurship skills in scientific academia: best practices from India and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1