Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU) of Patients (Pts) with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) Receiving Eculizumab in a US Population

IF 23.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood Pub Date : 2020-11-05 DOI:10.1182/BLOOD-2020-141648
W. Cheng, S. Sarda, N. Mody-Patel, S. Krishnan, M. Yenikomshian, Patrick J. Scoble, M. Mahendran, D. Lejeune, Louise Yu, M. Duh
{"title":"Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU) of Patients (Pts) with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) Receiving Eculizumab in a US Population","authors":"W. Cheng, S. Sarda, N. Mody-Patel, S. Krishnan, M. Yenikomshian, Patrick J. Scoble, M. Mahendran, D. Lejeune, Louise Yu, M. Duh","doi":"10.1182/BLOOD-2020-141648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\n The C5 inhibitor eculizumab is the current standard of care for the treatment of PNH. However, some pts receiving eculizumab to treat PNH continue to experience ongoing hemolysis and anemia, resulting in red blood cell transfusion dependence, substantial unmet clinical needs, and considerable health economic burden. This study evaluated the treatment patterns of pts with PNH receiving eculizumab and compared HRU among blood transfusion-dependent (TD) pts versus blood transfusion-free (TF) pts in real-world clinical practice in the United States.\n METHODS\n Pts aged ≥12 years with ≥2 claims for eculizumab infusion between April 1, 2014, and September 30, 2019, were identified from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases. The index date was the first observed claim for eculizumab infusion with ≥3 months of continuous eligibility prior (baseline period). Pts with ≥1 diagnosis of indications other than PNH for eculizumab (ie, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, generalized myasthenia gravis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder) during the baseline period or on the index date were excluded to identify pts with PNH. The full cohort of PNH pts treated with eculizumab were then stratified into the TD cohort (≥1 claim for blood transfusion within 6 months following any eculizumab infusion) or TF cohort. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics in the baseline period were compared between TD and TF cohorts using standardized differences (std diff), with >20% indicating substantial differences. Treatment patterns and HRU (all-cause and PNH-related) were evaluated during the observation period (ie, from index date to earliest date between end of continuous healthcare plan enrollment and end of data availability). Time from index date to treatment discontinuation among pts in the full cohort was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. HRU was compared between TD and TF cohorts using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for baseline covariates.\n RESULTS\n A total of 151 eculizumab users with PNH were identified as the full cohort; 55 (36%) were TD and 96 (64%) were TF. Mean (range) age was 36.7 (12-74) years among all pts (TD: 35.1 years; TF: 37.6 years). Overall, 56% of pts were female, with a higher proportion in the TD vs TF cohort (67% vs 49%; std diff = 38%). More pts in the TD vs TF cohort had blood transfusions (71% vs 18%; std diff = 127%) and use of corticosteroid therapy (46% vs 32%; std diff = 27%) during baseline. Baseline coagulopathy and aplastic anemia were more common in the TD vs TF cohort (coagulopathy: 49% vs 30%; std diff = 39%; aplastic anemia: 64% vs 43%; std diff = 43%). Myelodysplastic syndrome was present in 10% of the full cohort (TD: 13%; TF: 8%; std diff = 14%). During a mean observation period of 19 months for the overall sample (TD: 20 months; TF: 19 months), pts had a median (interquartile range) of 8 (3-30) eculizumab infusions (TD: 5 infusions; TF: 8 infusions) during maintenance phase; 29% of pts (TD: 21%; TF: 33%) had on average 14 days between maintenance eculizumab infusions; 61% of pts (TD: 66%; TF: 58%) discontinued eculizumab treatment (ie, gap of >42 days between 2 infusions) and the median time to treatment discontinuation was 254 days (TD: 180 days; TF: 337 days). Mean (range) number of blood transfusions among TD pts was 8.5 (1-54). During the observation period, pts in the TD cohort had 2.95 times more all-cause hospitalizations and 4.58 times more hospitalization days compared to pts in the TF cohort (all P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed for PNH-related hospitalizations. Results for all-cause and PNH-related HRU are presented in the Table.\n CONCLUSIONS\n This study demonstrated a considerable economic burden among pts with PNH treated with eculizumab, particularly among pts dependent on blood transfusions. TD eculizumab users comprised >36% of the overall sample, indicating that disease activity may not be well controlled. These pts had >4 times the number of hospitalization days compared to TF pts, emphasizing the substantial unmet clinical need despite treatment with eculizumab. These findings suggest that the current PNH standard of care may be insufficient for TD pts. Based on time between dosing intervals, >70% of PNH pts in this study were not dosed per label, and two-thirds of pts discontinued eculizumab within an average of a 1.5-year timeframe. New therapies are needed to reduce the considerable burden of pts with PNH.\n \n \n \n Cheng: Apellis: Research Funding. Sarda:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mody-Patel:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Krishnan:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yenikomshian:Apellis: Research Funding. Scoble:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mahendran:Apellis: Research Funding. Lejeune:Apellis: Research Funding. Yu:Apellis: Research Funding. Duh:Apellis: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicine: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.\n","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"15-16"},"PeriodicalIF":23.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD-2020-141648","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The C5 inhibitor eculizumab is the current standard of care for the treatment of PNH. However, some pts receiving eculizumab to treat PNH continue to experience ongoing hemolysis and anemia, resulting in red blood cell transfusion dependence, substantial unmet clinical needs, and considerable health economic burden. This study evaluated the treatment patterns of pts with PNH receiving eculizumab and compared HRU among blood transfusion-dependent (TD) pts versus blood transfusion-free (TF) pts in real-world clinical practice in the United States. METHODS Pts aged ≥12 years with ≥2 claims for eculizumab infusion between April 1, 2014, and September 30, 2019, were identified from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases. The index date was the first observed claim for eculizumab infusion with ≥3 months of continuous eligibility prior (baseline period). Pts with ≥1 diagnosis of indications other than PNH for eculizumab (ie, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, generalized myasthenia gravis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder) during the baseline period or on the index date were excluded to identify pts with PNH. The full cohort of PNH pts treated with eculizumab were then stratified into the TD cohort (≥1 claim for blood transfusion within 6 months following any eculizumab infusion) or TF cohort. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics in the baseline period were compared between TD and TF cohorts using standardized differences (std diff), with >20% indicating substantial differences. Treatment patterns and HRU (all-cause and PNH-related) were evaluated during the observation period (ie, from index date to earliest date between end of continuous healthcare plan enrollment and end of data availability). Time from index date to treatment discontinuation among pts in the full cohort was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. HRU was compared between TD and TF cohorts using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for baseline covariates. RESULTS A total of 151 eculizumab users with PNH were identified as the full cohort; 55 (36%) were TD and 96 (64%) were TF. Mean (range) age was 36.7 (12-74) years among all pts (TD: 35.1 years; TF: 37.6 years). Overall, 56% of pts were female, with a higher proportion in the TD vs TF cohort (67% vs 49%; std diff = 38%). More pts in the TD vs TF cohort had blood transfusions (71% vs 18%; std diff = 127%) and use of corticosteroid therapy (46% vs 32%; std diff = 27%) during baseline. Baseline coagulopathy and aplastic anemia were more common in the TD vs TF cohort (coagulopathy: 49% vs 30%; std diff = 39%; aplastic anemia: 64% vs 43%; std diff = 43%). Myelodysplastic syndrome was present in 10% of the full cohort (TD: 13%; TF: 8%; std diff = 14%). During a mean observation period of 19 months for the overall sample (TD: 20 months; TF: 19 months), pts had a median (interquartile range) of 8 (3-30) eculizumab infusions (TD: 5 infusions; TF: 8 infusions) during maintenance phase; 29% of pts (TD: 21%; TF: 33%) had on average 14 days between maintenance eculizumab infusions; 61% of pts (TD: 66%; TF: 58%) discontinued eculizumab treatment (ie, gap of >42 days between 2 infusions) and the median time to treatment discontinuation was 254 days (TD: 180 days; TF: 337 days). Mean (range) number of blood transfusions among TD pts was 8.5 (1-54). During the observation period, pts in the TD cohort had 2.95 times more all-cause hospitalizations and 4.58 times more hospitalization days compared to pts in the TF cohort (all P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed for PNH-related hospitalizations. Results for all-cause and PNH-related HRU are presented in the Table. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a considerable economic burden among pts with PNH treated with eculizumab, particularly among pts dependent on blood transfusions. TD eculizumab users comprised >36% of the overall sample, indicating that disease activity may not be well controlled. These pts had >4 times the number of hospitalization days compared to TF pts, emphasizing the substantial unmet clinical need despite treatment with eculizumab. These findings suggest that the current PNH standard of care may be insufficient for TD pts. Based on time between dosing intervals, >70% of PNH pts in this study were not dosed per label, and two-thirds of pts discontinued eculizumab within an average of a 1.5-year timeframe. New therapies are needed to reduce the considerable burden of pts with PNH. Cheng: Apellis: Research Funding. Sarda:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mody-Patel:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Krishnan:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yenikomshian:Apellis: Research Funding. Scoble:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mahendran:Apellis: Research Funding. Lejeune:Apellis: Research Funding. Yu:Apellis: Research Funding. Duh:Apellis: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicine: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国人群中接受Eculizumab的阵发性夜间血红蛋白尿(PNH)患者(Pts)的真实世界治疗模式和医疗资源利用率(HRU
C5抑制剂eculizumab是目前治疗PNH的标准护理。然而,一些接受eculizumab治疗PNH的患者继续经历持续的溶血和贫血,导致红细胞输血依赖,大量未满足的临床需求和相当大的健康经济负担。本研究评估了接受eculizumab的PNH患者的治疗模式,并在美国的现实世界临床实践中比较了输血依赖(TD)患者和无输血(TF)患者的HRU。方法从IBM®MarketScan®研究数据库中识别2014年4月1日至2019年9月30日期间年龄≥12岁且≥2例eculizumab输注索赔的患者。指标日期是第一个观察到的eculizumab输注索赔,既往连续资格≥3个月(基线期)。在基线期或索引日期,排除依珠单抗诊断为PNH以外适应症≥1例的患者(即非典型溶血性尿毒症综合征、全身性重症肌无力、视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍),以确定PNH患者。然后将接受eculizumab治疗的PNH患者的整个队列分为TD队列(在任何eculizumab输注后6个月内要求输血的≥1人)或TF队列。使用标准化差异(std diff)比较TD组和TF组基线期的患者人口学和临床特征,其中>20%表示存在显著差异。治疗模式和HRU(全因和pnh相关)在观察期间(即从索引日期到连续医疗保健计划登记结束和数据可用性结束之间的最早日期)进行评估。使用Kaplan-Meier分析评估全队列患者从指标日期到停止治疗的时间。采用发生率比(IRRs)对基线协变量进行校正,比较TD组和TF组的HRU。结果:共有151名eculizumab使用者被确定为PNH;TD 55例(36%),TF 96例(64%)。所有患者的平均(范围)年龄为36.7(12-74)岁(TD: 35.1岁;TF: 37.6岁)。总体而言,56%的患者是女性,其中TD组比TF组的比例更高(67%对49%;STD diff = 38%)。TD组比TF组有更多的患者输血(71%比18%;性病diff = 127%)和使用皮质类固醇治疗(46% vs 32%;基线期间的STD diff = 27%)。基线凝血功能障碍和再生障碍性贫血在TD组和TF组中更为常见(凝血功能障碍:49% vs 30%;STD diff = 39%;再生障碍性贫血:64% vs 43%;STD diff = 43%)。骨髓增生异常综合征出现在整个队列的10% (TD: 13%;TF: 8%;STD diff = 14%)。整个样本的平均观察期为19个月(TD: 20个月;TF: 19个月),患者的中位(四分位数范围)为8(3-30)次eculizumab输注(TD: 5次输注;TF: 8次)维持期;29%的pts (TD: 21%;TF: 33%)平均间隔14天维持eculizumab输注;61%的患者(TD: 66%;TF: 58%)停止eculizumab治疗(即,两次输注之间的间隔为442天),中位停药时间为254天(TD: 180天;TF: 337天)。TD患者平均(范围)输血次数为8.5次(1-54次)。观察期间,TD组患者的全因住院次数是TF组的2.95倍,住院天数是TF组的4.58倍(均P < 0.05)。与pnh相关的住院也观察到类似的趋势。全因HRU和pnh相关HRU的结果见表。结论:该研究表明,接受eculizumab治疗的PNH患者有相当大的经济负担,特别是依赖输血的患者。TD eculizumab使用者占总样本的60 - 36%,表明疾病活动可能没有得到很好的控制。这些患者的住院天数是TF患者的40倍,这强调了尽管使用eculizumab治疗,但仍有大量未满足的临床需求。这些发现表明,目前的PNH护理标准可能不足以治疗TD患者。基于给药间隔的时间,在本研究中,约70%的PNH患者没有每个标签给药,三分之二的患者在平均1.5年的时间范围内停止使用eculizumab。需要新的治疗方法来减轻PNH患者的沉重负担。Apellis:研究经费。Sarda:Apellis:目前的工作,上市公司的当前股东。Mody-Patel:Apellis:目前的工作,上市公司的当前股东。Krishnan:Apellis:目前的工作,上市公司的当前股东。Yenikomshian:Apellis:研究经费。Scoble:Apellis:目前的工作,上市公司的当前股东。Mahendran:Apellis:研究经费。Lejeune:Apellis:研究经费。Apellis:研究经费。 Duh:Apellis:研究经费;武田肿瘤:研究经费;葛兰素史克:研究经费;阿斯利康:研究经费;蓝图医药:研究经费;诺华:研究经费;夏尔:研究经费;默克:研究经费;药理学:研究经费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood
Blood 医学-血液学
CiteScore
23.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
955
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Blood, the official journal of the American Society of Hematology, published online and in print, provides an international forum for the publication of original articles describing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. Primary research articles will be published under the following scientific categories: Clinical Trials and Observations; Gene Therapy; Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells; Immunobiology and Immunotherapy scope; Myeloid Neoplasia; Lymphoid Neoplasia; Phagocytes, Granulocytes and Myelopoiesis; Platelets and Thrombopoiesis; Red Cells, Iron and Erythropoiesis; Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Transfusion Medicine; Transplantation; and Vascular Biology. Papers can be listed under more than one category as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
De novo CD19- B-ALL: awareness of a rare entity in initial diagnosis. Glutathionylated leaky mitochondrial pores as target in AML. Dysbiosis and gastrointestinal GVHD: to treat or not to treat. A viral Achilles' heel for EBV-positive lymphomas. Pediatric hospital-acquired thrombosis: time for a CHAT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1