Rural dialysis nurses’ experiences with challenging patients: a thematic qualitative analysis

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING Renal Society of Australasia Journal Pub Date : 2020-03-10 DOI:10.33235/rsaj.16.1.13-19
A. Jacob, C. Vafeas, Laurita Stoneman, Elisabeth R Jacob
{"title":"Rural dialysis nurses’ experiences with challenging patients: a thematic qualitative analysis","authors":"A. Jacob, C. Vafeas, Laurita Stoneman, Elisabeth R Jacob","doi":"10.33235/rsaj.16.1.13-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study explored the experience of nurses encountering challenging patient behaviour while working at a rural hospital-based haemodialysis unit. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with haemodialysis nurses at a rural hospital. Five participants across two focus groups were asked questions regarding their experiences of challenging patients, including impacts that the experiences may have had on their ongoing professional practice. Transcripts of the focus groups were analysed thematically. Findings: Three themes arose from the focus group discussion - experiencing challenging behaviour, long-term relationships with patients, and nursing professionalism. Participants described challenges arising when caring for patients who were aggressive, did not comply with self-management, or caused avoidable logistical challenges. Long-term caring relationships presented challenges as patients could become emotionally dependent upon one nurse, making it difficult to share workloads with other nurses. Participants reported decreased confidence, being near tears, being angry, and experiencing 'burnout' when caring for patients with difficult behaviour over extended periods. Participants managed challenging behaviours by identifying triggers, allocating staff to specific patients, and trying to understand the patient's motivation for action. 'Not taking work home' and 'not taking things personally' were ways in which nurses attempted to look after their own wellbeing, although this was not always possible. Participants stressed the importance of working as a team and having supportive management and inter-professional relationships. Significance: Participants' perceptions of working in the nursing profession were more related to their ability to work as a team and manage challenging behaviour exhibited by patients in a supportive environment than the presence of patients exhibiting challenging behaviour.","PeriodicalId":42629,"journal":{"name":"Renal Society of Australasia Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Society of Australasia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33235/rsaj.16.1.13-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: This study explored the experience of nurses encountering challenging patient behaviour while working at a rural hospital-based haemodialysis unit. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with haemodialysis nurses at a rural hospital. Five participants across two focus groups were asked questions regarding their experiences of challenging patients, including impacts that the experiences may have had on their ongoing professional practice. Transcripts of the focus groups were analysed thematically. Findings: Three themes arose from the focus group discussion - experiencing challenging behaviour, long-term relationships with patients, and nursing professionalism. Participants described challenges arising when caring for patients who were aggressive, did not comply with self-management, or caused avoidable logistical challenges. Long-term caring relationships presented challenges as patients could become emotionally dependent upon one nurse, making it difficult to share workloads with other nurses. Participants reported decreased confidence, being near tears, being angry, and experiencing 'burnout' when caring for patients with difficult behaviour over extended periods. Participants managed challenging behaviours by identifying triggers, allocating staff to specific patients, and trying to understand the patient's motivation for action. 'Not taking work home' and 'not taking things personally' were ways in which nurses attempted to look after their own wellbeing, although this was not always possible. Participants stressed the importance of working as a team and having supportive management and inter-professional relationships. Significance: Participants' perceptions of working in the nursing profession were more related to their ability to work as a team and manage challenging behaviour exhibited by patients in a supportive environment than the presence of patients exhibiting challenging behaviour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村透析护士应对挑战性患者的经验:专题定性分析
背景:本研究探讨了护士在农村医院血液透析室工作时遇到挑战性患者行为的经历。方法:对某农村医院的血液透析护士进行焦点小组调查。两个重点小组的五名参与者被问及他们挑战患者的经历,包括这些经历可能对他们正在进行的专业实践产生的影响。重点小组的转录本按主题进行分析。研究结果:焦点小组讨论产生了三个主题——经历具有挑战性的行为、与患者的长期关系以及护理专业精神。参与者描述了在照顾好斗、不遵守自我管理或造成可避免的后勤挑战的患者时出现的挑战。长期的护理关系带来了挑战,因为患者可能会在情感上依赖一名护士,从而难以与其他护士分担工作量。参与者报告说,在长期照顾行为困难的患者时,他们的信心下降,几乎要哭了,很生气,并经历了“倦怠”。参与者通过识别触发因素、将工作人员分配给特定患者以及试图了解患者的行动动机来管理具有挑战性的行为。”不把工作带回家”和“不把事情个人化”是护士们试图照顾自己健康的方式,尽管这并不总是可能的。与会者强调了团队合作以及建立支持性管理和跨专业关系的重要性。意义:参与者对在护理行业工作的看法更多地与他们作为一个团队工作和管理患者在支持性环境中表现出的挑战性行为的能力有关,而不是与患者表现出挑战性行为有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
CARI guidelines: Culturally safe and clinical kidney care for First Nations Australians – A summary Bioelectrical impedance analysis for measuring body composition in an outpatient haemodialysis setting: a feasibility study Understanding burnout in the current nephrology nursing workforce and health service ‘magnet’ qualities that may help address it: a discreet choice experiment Prospective randomised crossover trial comparing mixed and post-dilution haemodiafiltration: COMPare HDF study Hepatitis B vaccination in patients with stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease – a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1