Ambiguous Authorities: Vertigo and the Auteur Figure

Q2 Arts and Humanities Authorship Pub Date : 2017-12-21 DOI:10.21825/AJ.V6I2.7700
Isabelle Licari-Guillaume
{"title":"Ambiguous Authorities: Vertigo and the Auteur Figure","authors":"Isabelle Licari-Guillaume","doi":"10.21825/AJ.V6I2.7700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines authorial performance in the context of DC’s Vertigo line. In the 1990s, Vertigo gained its reputation as an innovative and progressive imprint by promoting the work of British scriptwriters, who were hailed as true author figures, despite the inherently collaborative nature of the mainstream comics industry. In a manner reminiscent of “auteur theory”, writers such as Neil Gaiman, Warren Ellis or Grant Morrison developed attractive author personas which they consistently displayed through interviews, letter columns or social media, but also, more importantly, by inserting their avatars within the comics they scripted. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that their work in fact simultaneously asserts and destabilizes writerly authority, in a manner that is consistent with Linda Hutcheon’s view of postmodernity. By multiplying author figures and playfully disseminating authority, Vertigo authors question their own authorial control over the text, asserting instead the crucial role played by the reader.","PeriodicalId":30455,"journal":{"name":"Authorship","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/AJ.V6I2.7700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article examines authorial performance in the context of DC’s Vertigo line. In the 1990s, Vertigo gained its reputation as an innovative and progressive imprint by promoting the work of British scriptwriters, who were hailed as true author figures, despite the inherently collaborative nature of the mainstream comics industry. In a manner reminiscent of “auteur theory”, writers such as Neil Gaiman, Warren Ellis or Grant Morrison developed attractive author personas which they consistently displayed through interviews, letter columns or social media, but also, more importantly, by inserting their avatars within the comics they scripted. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that their work in fact simultaneously asserts and destabilizes writerly authority, in a manner that is consistent with Linda Hutcheon’s view of postmodernity. By multiplying author figures and playfully disseminating authority, Vertigo authors question their own authorial control over the text, asserting instead the crucial role played by the reader.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模棱两可的权威:眩晕与导演形象
本文以DC的《迷魂记》系列为背景来考察作者的表现。20世纪90年代,《迷魂记》通过宣传英国编剧的作品而获得了创新和进步的声誉,尽管主流漫画行业天生具有协作性质,但英国编剧被誉为真正的作家人物。尼尔·盖曼(Neil Gaiman)、沃伦·埃利斯(Warren Ellis)或格兰特·莫里森(Grant Morrison。然而,经过仔细研究,很明显,他们的作品实际上同时断言和破坏了写作权威,这与Linda Hutcheon对后现代性的看法是一致的。通过增加作者形象和开玩笑地传播权威,《迷魂记》的作者质疑自己对文本的作者控制,转而主张读者所扮演的关键角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Better place no wit can finde”: The Compiler as Author in Early Modern Verse Miscellanies “Unembedded, Disappeared”: “As Truthful as Our Notion of the Past Can Ever Be”: William Edward Daniel Ross’s Transformation into a Popular Fiction Novelist, 1962-1967 Writing Back against Canada’s Fictive Ethnicity:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1