A Single-Session Combined Cognitive Bias Modification Training Targeting Attention and Interpretation Biases in Aggression

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behaviour Change Pub Date : 2021-07-30 DOI:10.1017/bec.2021.11
Nouran AlMoghrabi, I. Franken, B. Mayer, J. Huijding
{"title":"A Single-Session Combined Cognitive Bias Modification Training Targeting Attention and Interpretation Biases in Aggression","authors":"Nouran AlMoghrabi, I. Franken, B. Mayer, J. Huijding","doi":"10.1017/bec.2021.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Experimental studies applying cognitive bias modification of attention (CBM-A) and interpretation (CBM-I) to reduce aggression have examined the effect of modifying each cognitive bias in isolation. In order to maximise the potential impact on both biases and symptom reduction, we examined whether a combined bias training procedure targeting both attention and interpretation biases (CBM-AI) in combination would be more effective than targeting interpretation bias (CBM-I) alone. University students (17–35 years) were randomly assigned to either a single session of CBM-AI training (n = 40), CBM-I training (n = 40), or a control condition (n = 40). Contrary to our expectations, participants showed an increase in adaptive attention and pro-social interpretation bias in all training conditions. Additionally, in none of the conditions, we found a significant change on self-reported or behavioural aggression. These findings suggest: (1) that the combined training did not have added effect over single interpretation bias training, (2) that training interpretation bias may lead to changes in attention bias, (3) that elements of the control condition unexpectedly, but interestingly, also affected attention and interpretation biases, and (4) single-session CBM procedures do not produce robust effects on self-report or behavioural measures of aggression in unselected samples.","PeriodicalId":46485,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Change","volume":"39 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/bec.2021.11","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Change","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2021.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Experimental studies applying cognitive bias modification of attention (CBM-A) and interpretation (CBM-I) to reduce aggression have examined the effect of modifying each cognitive bias in isolation. In order to maximise the potential impact on both biases and symptom reduction, we examined whether a combined bias training procedure targeting both attention and interpretation biases (CBM-AI) in combination would be more effective than targeting interpretation bias (CBM-I) alone. University students (17–35 years) were randomly assigned to either a single session of CBM-AI training (n = 40), CBM-I training (n = 40), or a control condition (n = 40). Contrary to our expectations, participants showed an increase in adaptive attention and pro-social interpretation bias in all training conditions. Additionally, in none of the conditions, we found a significant change on self-reported or behavioural aggression. These findings suggest: (1) that the combined training did not have added effect over single interpretation bias training, (2) that training interpretation bias may lead to changes in attention bias, (3) that elements of the control condition unexpectedly, but interestingly, also affected attention and interpretation biases, and (4) single-session CBM procedures do not produce robust effects on self-report or behavioural measures of aggression in unselected samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对攻击中注意和解释偏差的单节课认知偏差修正训练
应用注意认知偏差修正(CBM-A)和解释认知偏差修正(CBM-I)来降低攻击行为的实验研究考察了单独修正每一种认知偏差的效果。为了最大限度地提高对偏倚和症状减轻的潜在影响,我们研究了针对注意力和解释偏倚(CBM-AI)的联合偏倚训练程序是否比单独针对解释偏倚(CBM-I)更有效。17-35岁的大学生被随机分配到单次CBM-AI训练(n = 40)、CBM-I训练(n = 40)或对照条件(n = 40)。与我们的预期相反,参与者在所有训练条件下都表现出适应性注意和亲社会解释偏见的增加。此外,在任何一种情况下,我们都没有发现自我报告或行为攻击的显著变化。这些发现表明:(1)联合训练并没有比单一解释偏见训练产生额外的效果;(2)训练解释偏见可能导致注意偏见的变化;(3)控制条件的元素出乎意料地(但有趣的是)也影响了注意和解释偏见;(4)单次CBM程序对非选择样本的自我报告或攻击行为测量没有产生强大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour Change
Behaviour Change PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Behaviour Change is the journal of the Australian Association for Cognitive and Behavioural Therapy and has long been considered a leader in its field. It is a quarterly journal that publishes research involving the application of behavioural and cognitive-behavioural principles and techniques to the assessment and treatment of various problems. Features of Behaviour Change include: original empirical studies using either single subject or group comparison methodologies review articles case studies brief technical and clinical notes book reviews special issues dealing with particular topics in depth.
期刊最新文献
A Tribute to the Behaviour Change Journal, 1984-2023 Online Self-Help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Module for College Students with Higher Gaming Disorder During COVID-19: A Pilot Study The Impact of Cognitive Restructuring on Post-Event Rumination and Its Situational Effect on Socially Anxious Adolescents The Social Determinants of Loneliness During COVID-19: Personal, Community, and Societal Predictors and Implications for Treatment – CORRIGENDUM The Social Determinants of Loneliness During COVID-19: Personal, Community, and Societal Predictors and Implications for Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1