Crop mix portfolio response to climate risks: evidence from smallholder farmers in Kisumu County, Kenya

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Agrekon Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.1080/03031853.2022.2028642
Hezbon Akelo Awiti, E. Gido, G. Obare
{"title":"Crop mix portfolio response to climate risks: evidence from smallholder farmers in Kisumu County, Kenya","authors":"Hezbon Akelo Awiti, E. Gido, G. Obare","doi":"10.1080/03031853.2022.2028642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Farm households respond to market uncertainties and household demand for food commodities by diversifying their farm-level crop portfolio. However, it is unclear if farmers’ crop mix also responds to unpredictable climate variability. We use primary data from 267 randomly selected respondents and apply a multinomial logit model to test the hypothesis that crop portfolio choice is an ex-ante mechanism to manage climate risks in the absence of crop insurance. The results suggest that access to information on climate variability does influence the mix of maize, cassava, sweet potato, and sorghum, which smallholder farmers in Kisumu County, Kenya grow in various combinations. Access to credit services, farm size, gender of household head, farming experience, and distance to nearest market also influence the farm-level crop mixture. These findings imply that policies geared towards incentivizing a better crop choice portfolio at the smallholder farm level should address climate variability awareness. In addition, encouraging crop-variety mixes that are tolerant to climate risks would enhance resilience in food systems among these smallholder farmers.","PeriodicalId":55541,"journal":{"name":"Agrekon","volume":"61 1","pages":"192 - 206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrekon","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2022.2028642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Farm households respond to market uncertainties and household demand for food commodities by diversifying their farm-level crop portfolio. However, it is unclear if farmers’ crop mix also responds to unpredictable climate variability. We use primary data from 267 randomly selected respondents and apply a multinomial logit model to test the hypothesis that crop portfolio choice is an ex-ante mechanism to manage climate risks in the absence of crop insurance. The results suggest that access to information on climate variability does influence the mix of maize, cassava, sweet potato, and sorghum, which smallholder farmers in Kisumu County, Kenya grow in various combinations. Access to credit services, farm size, gender of household head, farming experience, and distance to nearest market also influence the farm-level crop mixture. These findings imply that policies geared towards incentivizing a better crop choice portfolio at the smallholder farm level should address climate variability awareness. In addition, encouraging crop-variety mixes that are tolerant to climate risks would enhance resilience in food systems among these smallholder farmers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作物组合对气候风险的反应:来自肯尼亚基苏木县小农户的证据
摘要农业家庭通过多样化其农场层面的作物组合来应对市场的不确定性和家庭对粮食商品的需求。然而,目前尚不清楚农民的作物组合是否也会对不可预测的气候变化做出反应。我们使用来自267名随机选择的受访者的主要数据,并应用多项logit模型来检验作物投资组合选择是在没有作物保险的情况下管理气候风险的事前机制的假设。研究结果表明,获取气候变化信息确实会影响玉米、木薯、红薯和高粱的组合,肯尼亚基苏木县的小农户以各种组合种植玉米、木薯和红薯。获得信贷服务的机会、农场规模、户主性别、农业经验以及与最近市场的距离也会影响农场层面的作物组合。这些发现意味着,旨在激励小农户更好地选择作物组合的政策应该解决气候变化意识问题。此外,鼓励耐受气候风险的作物品种组合将增强这些小农户的粮食系统抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrekon
Agrekon AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Agrekon publishes scholarly articles that contribute to the existing literature in the domain of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics as it applies to Southern Africa. The editors of Agrekon therefore invite contributions in this context that provide new insights, either through the problems they address, the methods they employ or the theoretical and practical insights gained from the results. The quarterly journal serves as the official publication of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA) and is published by Taylor & Francis.
期刊最新文献
Proposing a farm assessment toolkit: evaluating a South African land reform case study Modelling the exiting of South African producers from commercial agricultural production – an agent-based model The Covid pandemic, cultivation and livelihoods in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Agricultural productivity, land use intensification and rural household welfare: evidence from Ethiopia Is persistent “loadshedding” pulling the plug on agriculture in the Western Cape, South Africa?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1