Early mobilisation of patients in the acute hospital setting following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage – a survey of current physiotherapy practice

Q3 Health Professions New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.15619/NZJP/46.3.04
S. Hernandez, P. Thomas, A. Udy, C. Hodgson
{"title":"Early mobilisation of patients in the acute hospital setting following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage – a survey of current physiotherapy practice","authors":"S. Hernandez, P. Thomas, A. Udy, C. Hodgson","doi":"10.15619/NZJP/46.3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage is a catastrophic form of stroke. There is very limited literature to guide physiotherapists on the type and timing of mobility interventions that should be provided during the acute phase. The aim of this study was to determine the current practices of physiotherapists in early mobilisation of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. A purposedesigned electronic survey was distributed to 71 physiotherapists in hospitals that specialise in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage throughout Australia and New Zealand. A response rate of 80% was obtained (n=57). Prior to the aneurysm being repaired, the most common practice reported by physiotherapists was not to mobilise patients (41%). Once the aneurysm was repaired, mobility goals increased with >80% of physiotherapists reporting goals of sitting on the edge of the bed or step transferring to a chair day one post repair. Physiotherapists reported that vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischaemia, recent further bleed, hypotension or the use of high level of noradrenaline would prevent them from mobilising patients. Only four respondents reported that they had a mobilisation protocol for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients at their hospital. Further research is required into the safety, timing and efficacy of early mobilisation practices in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. Hernandez, S., Thomas, P., Udy, A., Hodgson, C. (2018). Early mobilisation of patients in the acute hospital setting following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage – a survey of current physiotherapy practice. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy 46(3): 113-132. doi:10.15619/NZJP/46.3.04","PeriodicalId":52167,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15619/NZJP/46.3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage is a catastrophic form of stroke. There is very limited literature to guide physiotherapists on the type and timing of mobility interventions that should be provided during the acute phase. The aim of this study was to determine the current practices of physiotherapists in early mobilisation of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. A purposedesigned electronic survey was distributed to 71 physiotherapists in hospitals that specialise in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage throughout Australia and New Zealand. A response rate of 80% was obtained (n=57). Prior to the aneurysm being repaired, the most common practice reported by physiotherapists was not to mobilise patients (41%). Once the aneurysm was repaired, mobility goals increased with >80% of physiotherapists reporting goals of sitting on the edge of the bed or step transferring to a chair day one post repair. Physiotherapists reported that vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischaemia, recent further bleed, hypotension or the use of high level of noradrenaline would prevent them from mobilising patients. Only four respondents reported that they had a mobilisation protocol for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients at their hospital. Further research is required into the safety, timing and efficacy of early mobilisation practices in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. Hernandez, S., Thomas, P., Udy, A., Hodgson, C. (2018). Early mobilisation of patients in the acute hospital setting following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage – a survey of current physiotherapy practice. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy 46(3): 113-132. doi:10.15619/NZJP/46.3.04
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后急性住院患者的早期动员-当前物理治疗实践的调查
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血是一种灾难性的中风。指导理疗师在急性期进行行动干预的类型和时间的文献非常有限。本研究的目的是确定物理治疗师在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者早期动员方面的现行做法。一项专门设计的电子调查被分发给了澳大利亚和新西兰专门治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的医院的71名理疗师。获得了80%的应答率(n=57)。在动脉瘤修复之前,理疗师报告的最常见的做法是不动员患者(41%)。动脉瘤修复后,活动性目标增加,80%以上的理疗师报告说,修复后的第一天,他们的目标是坐在床边或台阶上。物理治疗师报告说,血管痉挛、延迟性脑缺血、最近进一步出血、低血压或使用高水平的去甲肾上腺素会阻止他们动员患者。只有四名受访者报告说,他们在医院有动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的动员方案。需要对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者早期动员实践的安全性、时机和有效性进行进一步研究。Hernandez,S.,Thomas,P.,Udy,A.,Hodgson,C.(2018)。动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后急性住院患者的早期动员——对当前物理治疗实践的调查。新西兰物理疗法杂志46(3):113-132。doi:10.15619/NZJP/46.3.04
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy
New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Health navigation for people experiencing newly acquired long-term physical disability: A realist-informed integrative review How do novice physiotherapists describe their experiences of workplace support? The relevance of research in clinical practice Physiotherapy management of adults with asthma: A survey of New Zealand practice Patient expectations of benefit from physiotherapy and relationship to self-reported outcomes: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1