Adoption of smart contracts in the construction industry: an institutional analysis of drivers and barriers

IF 3.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Construction Innovation-England Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1108/ci-03-2022-0066
G. Shang, Low Sui Pheng, Roderick Low Zhong Xia
{"title":"Adoption of smart contracts in the construction industry: an institutional analysis of drivers and barriers","authors":"G. Shang, Low Sui Pheng, Roderick Low Zhong Xia","doi":"10.1108/ci-03-2022-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe construction industry has arrived at a crossroads of rapid technological progress. While it is foreseen that the advent of new construction technologies will disrupt the construction industry’s future, such disruptions often create the ideal environment for innovation. As poor payment practices continue to plague the construction industry, the advent of smart contracts has created an opportunity to rectify the inherent flaws in the mitigation of payment problems in traditional construction contracts. Given the intrinsic resistance of construction firms to such revolutionary changes, this study aims to understand the various factors influencing the adoption of smart contracts in the Singapore construction industry.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA mixed method was adopted involving quantifying respondents’ perceptions of the factors influencing smart contract adoption, and validation from a group of interviewees on the matter. Out of 461 registered quantity surveyor members contacted via the Singapore institute of surveyors and valuers website, 55 respondents took part in the survey. This is followed by semi-structured interviews to validate the survey results.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicate that construction firms have neither a significant knowledge of nor willingness to adopt smart contracts. A total of 29 institutional factors were also identified that significantly influence the adoption of smart contracts. The quantitative findings were further reinforced by qualitative interviews with five industry experts.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWith recognition of and the successful formulation of the significant institutional drivers and barriers, the key findings of this study will be integral in driving the commercial adoption of smart contracts within the construction industry.\n","PeriodicalId":45580,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation-England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-03-2022-0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The construction industry has arrived at a crossroads of rapid technological progress. While it is foreseen that the advent of new construction technologies will disrupt the construction industry’s future, such disruptions often create the ideal environment for innovation. As poor payment practices continue to plague the construction industry, the advent of smart contracts has created an opportunity to rectify the inherent flaws in the mitigation of payment problems in traditional construction contracts. Given the intrinsic resistance of construction firms to such revolutionary changes, this study aims to understand the various factors influencing the adoption of smart contracts in the Singapore construction industry. Design/methodology/approach A mixed method was adopted involving quantifying respondents’ perceptions of the factors influencing smart contract adoption, and validation from a group of interviewees on the matter. Out of 461 registered quantity surveyor members contacted via the Singapore institute of surveyors and valuers website, 55 respondents took part in the survey. This is followed by semi-structured interviews to validate the survey results. Findings The findings indicate that construction firms have neither a significant knowledge of nor willingness to adopt smart contracts. A total of 29 institutional factors were also identified that significantly influence the adoption of smart contracts. The quantitative findings were further reinforced by qualitative interviews with five industry experts. Originality/value With recognition of and the successful formulation of the significant institutional drivers and barriers, the key findings of this study will be integral in driving the commercial adoption of smart contracts within the construction industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑业采用智能合约:驱动因素和障碍的制度分析
目的建筑业正处于技术快速进步的十字路口。虽然可以预见,新建筑技术的出现将破坏建筑业的未来,但这种破坏往往会为创新创造理想的环境。随着糟糕的支付方式继续困扰着建筑业,智能合同的出现为纠正传统建筑合同中缓解支付问题的固有缺陷创造了机会。鉴于建筑公司对这种革命性变化的内在抵制,本研究旨在了解影响新加坡建筑业采用智能合同的各种因素。设计/方法/方法采用了一种混合方法,包括量化受访者对影响智能合约采用的因素的看法,以及一组受访者对此事的验证。在新加坡测量师和估价师协会网站联系的461名注册工料测量师成员中,有55名受访者参加了调查。随后进行半结构化访谈,以验证调查结果。调查结果表明,建筑公司既不了解也不愿意采用智能合约。还发现了29个对智能合约的采用有重大影响的制度因素。对五位行业专家进行的定性访谈进一步强化了定量调查结果。独创性/价值随着对重要制度驱动因素和障碍的认识和成功制定,本研究的关键发现将成为推动建筑行业智能合同商业应用的不可或缺的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Construction Innovation-England
Construction Innovation-England CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
71
期刊最新文献
Usage of digital technology in improving the mental health of workers on construction sites Uncertainties affecting the offsite construction supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review Developing an interactive pile training module for construction risk management and gaging users’ intentions Impact of trust in virtual project teams: structural equation modelling approach Customized shading solutions for complex building façades: the potential of an innovative cement-textile composite material through a performance-based generative design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1