Comparison of Early and Late Administration of Convalescent Plasma for the Treatment of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit Retrospectively

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2023.38233
Duygu Kayar Çalılı, Abdullah Ömer Atsal, Belgin Tunçtürk Akan, H. Ankarali, Canan Çam Gönen, Işıl Özkoçak Turan
{"title":"Comparison of Early and Late Administration of Convalescent Plasma for the Treatment of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit Retrospectively","authors":"Duygu Kayar Çalılı, Abdullah Ömer Atsal, Belgin Tunçtürk Akan, H. Ankarali, Canan Çam Gönen, Işıl Özkoçak Turan","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.38233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to compare laboratory and outcome of the patients who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) and transfused convalescent plasma based on timing of treatment. Methods: Patients administered 200 mL of convalescent plasma were analysed retrospectively. Based on symptoms’ onset, patients were divided into two groups as early (≤ 7 days) and late (> 7 days) plasma treatment groups. Patients’ characteristics, comorbidities, treatments, laboratory (pre-transfusion, day 1 and day 3 after transfusion) and outcome were evaluated according to groups. Results: A total of 152 patients matched criteria. There was no difference between the early (n=82) and late (n=70) treatment groups in terms of demographic characteristics, comorbidities, treatments, outcomes. Ferritin levels were higher in the early treatment group than in the late treatment group on before transfusion and day 1 (p=0.023, p=0.015). C reactive protein value was lower in the late treatment group on day 3 (p=0.011). Comparing the rate of change between day 1 and day 3 of treatment, it was observed that the changes in ferritin and fibrinogen values were higher in the late group than in the early group (p=0.014, p=0.049). There was no difference between the groups in other laboratory values and outcome. Conclusion: In our study, we observed that the timing of convalescent plasma had no significant effect on outcome. However, more evidence was needed to prove the difference in laboratory results. Keywords: Intensive care unit, COVID-19, convalescent plasma, mortality","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.38233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare laboratory and outcome of the patients who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) and transfused convalescent plasma based on timing of treatment. Methods: Patients administered 200 mL of convalescent plasma were analysed retrospectively. Based on symptoms’ onset, patients were divided into two groups as early (≤ 7 days) and late (> 7 days) plasma treatment groups. Patients’ characteristics, comorbidities, treatments, laboratory (pre-transfusion, day 1 and day 3 after transfusion) and outcome were evaluated according to groups. Results: A total of 152 patients matched criteria. There was no difference between the early (n=82) and late (n=70) treatment groups in terms of demographic characteristics, comorbidities, treatments, outcomes. Ferritin levels were higher in the early treatment group than in the late treatment group on before transfusion and day 1 (p=0.023, p=0.015). C reactive protein value was lower in the late treatment group on day 3 (p=0.011). Comparing the rate of change between day 1 and day 3 of treatment, it was observed that the changes in ferritin and fibrinogen values were higher in the late group than in the early group (p=0.014, p=0.049). There was no difference between the groups in other laboratory values and outcome. Conclusion: In our study, we observed that the timing of convalescent plasma had no significant effect on outcome. However, more evidence was needed to prove the difference in laboratory results. Keywords: Intensive care unit, COVID-19, convalescent plasma, mortality
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾性比较重症监护病房治疗COVID-19患者早期和晚期恢复期血浆的应用效果
目的:我们旨在比较重症监护室住院患者的实验室和结果与诊断为冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)和根据治疗时间输注恢复期血浆的情况。方法:对服用200 mL恢复期血浆的患者进行回顾性分析。根据症状的发作,将患者分为早期(≤7天)和晚期(>7天)血浆治疗组。按组评估患者的特征、合并症、治疗、实验室(输血前、输血后第1天和第3天)和结果。结果:共有152名患者符合标准。早期(n=82)和晚期(n=70)治疗组在人口统计学特征、合并症、治疗和结果方面没有差异。在输血前和第1天,早期治疗组的铁蛋白水平高于晚期治疗组(p=0.023,p=0.015)。晚期治疗组在第3天的C反应蛋白值较低(p=0.011)。比较治疗第1天和第3天之间的变化率,观察到晚期组的铁蛋白和纤维蛋白原值的变化高于早期组(p=0.014,p=0.049)。两组在其他实验室值和结果方面没有差异。结论:在我们的研究中,我们观察到恢复期血浆的时间对结果没有显著影响。然而,还需要更多的证据来证明实验室结果的差异。关键词:重症监护室,新冠肺炎,恢复期血浆,死亡率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1