Cause of death: femicide

IF 0.7 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Mortality Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI:10.1080/13576275.2022.2155509
Kate Fitz‐Gibbon, S. Walklate
{"title":"Cause of death: femicide","authors":"Kate Fitz‐Gibbon, S. Walklate","doi":"10.1080/13576275.2022.2155509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Labelled ‘the shadow pandemic’ by UN Women, violence against women received considerable global public attention during 2020–21. Underpinning this moment of public concern, there lies a substantial history of efforts to document the nature of, and campaign against, the extent of violence against women globally. This is also the case in relation to femicide. Whilst we recognise that this is a contested term, for the purposes of this paper we use femicide to refer to the killing of women and girls because they are female by male violence. Femicide, as a death to be specifically counted in law only exists in a small number of jurisdictions. Where it is so recognised, primarily in South American countries as feminicidio, such deaths represent only the tip of the iceberg of such killings globally. This paper, in drawing on empirical data from a range of different sources (including administrative data, media analysis, and Femicide Observatory data) gathered throughout 2020, considers: what it means to call a death femicide, what implications might follow if all the deaths of women at the hands of men were counted as femicide, and the extent to which extraordinary times have any bearing on this kind of ordinary death.","PeriodicalId":40045,"journal":{"name":"Mortality","volume":"28 1","pages":"236 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mortality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2022.2155509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Labelled ‘the shadow pandemic’ by UN Women, violence against women received considerable global public attention during 2020–21. Underpinning this moment of public concern, there lies a substantial history of efforts to document the nature of, and campaign against, the extent of violence against women globally. This is also the case in relation to femicide. Whilst we recognise that this is a contested term, for the purposes of this paper we use femicide to refer to the killing of women and girls because they are female by male violence. Femicide, as a death to be specifically counted in law only exists in a small number of jurisdictions. Where it is so recognised, primarily in South American countries as feminicidio, such deaths represent only the tip of the iceberg of such killings globally. This paper, in drawing on empirical data from a range of different sources (including administrative data, media analysis, and Femicide Observatory data) gathered throughout 2020, considers: what it means to call a death femicide, what implications might follow if all the deaths of women at the hands of men were counted as femicide, and the extent to which extraordinary times have any bearing on this kind of ordinary death.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死亡原因:杀害女性
针对妇女的暴力行为被联合国妇女署称为“阴影流行病”,在2020-21年期间受到了全球公众的广泛关注。在这一公众关注的时刻,在记录全球对妇女的暴力行为的性质和开展反对运动方面有着悠久的历史。在杀害妇女问题上也是如此。虽然我们认识到这是一个有争议的术语,但出于本文的目的,我们使用弑女罪来指因女性而被男性暴力杀害的妇女和女孩。杀害妇女作为一种应在法律上具体计算的死亡,只存在于少数司法管辖区。在被认为是杀害女性的地方,主要是在南美国家,这种死亡只是全球此类杀戮的冰山一角。本文利用了2020年收集的一系列不同来源的经验数据(包括行政数据、媒体分析和杀害女性观察站的数据),考虑了以下问题:所谓的“杀害女性”意味着什么,如果所有死于男性之手的女性都被算作杀害女性,可能会产生什么影响,以及特殊时期对这种普通死亡的影响程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mortality
Mortality Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: A foremost international, interdisciplinary journal that has relevance both for academics and professionals concerned with human mortality. Mortality is essential reading for those in the field of death studies and in a range of disciplines, including anthropology, art, classics, history, literature, medicine, music, socio-legal studies, social policy, sociology, philosophy, psychology and religious studies. The journal is also of special interest and relevance for those professionally or voluntarily engaged in the health and caring professions, in bereavement counselling, the funeral industries, and in central and local government.
期刊最新文献
Death enchanted: comparing conventional and conservation burial in the United States with a technological mediation lens Can death be casual: the paradox in Death Café blogs Respect, agency, and posthumous wishes Caring for the dead at home: an exploratory study of home deathcare in England The communicative functions of epitaphs in the linguistic landscape of Libingan ng mga Bayani (Heroes’ Cemetery), Philippines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1