Labor as a Linchpin in Ecosystem Services Conservation: Appropriating Value from Collective Institutions?

Q1 Social Sciences Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Pub Date : 2021-05-13 DOI:10.1080/10455752.2021.1927126
Audrey Joslin
{"title":"Labor as a Linchpin in Ecosystem Services Conservation: Appropriating Value from Collective Institutions?","authors":"Audrey Joslin","doi":"10.1080/10455752.2021.1927126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The role of labor in value production for neoliberal conservation arrangements is a topic that has only recently begun to receive attention from scholars. Engaging with Marx’s labor theory of value, this article analyzes the interaction of a water fund Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) program with labor institutions in the Ecuadorian Andes. Data from participant observation, key actor interviews, and textual materials support an empirical case study of the model water fund, Fondo para la protección del agua – FONAG. Despite neoliberal discourse promoting financial and material incentives as the main driver of conservation action, this article demonstrates how PES agreements interact with pre-existing labor and land use regimes to generate and circulate value beyond the contractual arrangement between the target community and PES promoters. This article furthermore highlights how value produced from pre-existing labor institutions may constitute an overlooked component of “green grabbing” as it may be unacknowledged and susceptible to appropriation by international organizations.","PeriodicalId":39549,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10455752.2021.1927126","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2021.1927126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The role of labor in value production for neoliberal conservation arrangements is a topic that has only recently begun to receive attention from scholars. Engaging with Marx’s labor theory of value, this article analyzes the interaction of a water fund Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) program with labor institutions in the Ecuadorian Andes. Data from participant observation, key actor interviews, and textual materials support an empirical case study of the model water fund, Fondo para la protección del agua – FONAG. Despite neoliberal discourse promoting financial and material incentives as the main driver of conservation action, this article demonstrates how PES agreements interact with pre-existing labor and land use regimes to generate and circulate value beyond the contractual arrangement between the target community and PES promoters. This article furthermore highlights how value produced from pre-existing labor institutions may constitute an overlooked component of “green grabbing” as it may be unacknowledged and susceptible to appropriation by international organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳动作为生态系统服务保护的关键:从集体制度中获取价值?
劳工在新自由主义保护安排的价值生产中的作用是一个最近才开始受到学者关注的话题。本文运用马克思的劳动价值理论,分析了厄瓜多尔安第斯山脉水利基金生态系统服务支付计划与劳动机构的互动关系。来自参与者观察、关键参与者访谈和文本材料的数据支持了对模型水基金Fondo para la protección del agua–FONAG的实证案例研究。尽管新自由主义话语将财政和物质激励作为保护行动的主要驱动力,但本文展示了PES协议如何与预先存在的劳动力和土地使用制度相互作用,以在目标社区和PES推动者之间的合同安排之外产生和流通价值。这篇文章进一步强调了从现有的劳工制度中产生的价值如何可能构成“绿色攫取”的一个被忽视的组成部分,因为它可能未被承认,并且容易被国际组织挪用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: CNS is a journal of ecosocialism. We welcome submissions on red-green politics and the anti-globalization movement; environmental history; workplace labor struggles; land/community struggles; political economy of ecology; and other themes in political ecology. CNS especially wants to join (relate) discourses on labor, feminist, and environmental movements, and theories of political ecology and radical democracy. Works on ecology and socialism are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Political Implications of Unequal Exchange: Towards a Common Agenda for Global Social Movements State of Exception, Necropolitics, and Puerto Rico: Naturalizing Disaster and Naturalizing Difference The Quest for Revolutionary Love: John P. Clark Interviews Javier Sethness about Queer Tolstoy Beyond Trash and Garbage: Shifting Perspectives on Discard Discard studies: wasting, systems, and power , Max Liboiron and Josh Lepawsky, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2022, 212 pages, $30 (paperback), ISBN: 9780262543651 Rooted-South Feminisms: Disobedient Epistemologies and Transformative Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1