Strengthening water, sanitation and hygiene governance: a critical review of Zimbabwe's WASH sector institutional arrangements

IF 1.5 Q4 WATER RESOURCES H2Open Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-06 DOI:10.2166/h2oj.2022.063
L. Dhoba
{"title":"Strengthening water, sanitation and hygiene governance: a critical review of Zimbabwe's WASH sector institutional arrangements","authors":"L. Dhoba","doi":"10.2166/h2oj.2022.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper sought to review the structural and operational modalities for Zimbabwe's water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector coordination architecture with an objective to identify gaps and recommend areas for further strengthening. Data were collected using a mixed-method approach involving a questionnaire survey, focus group discussions, key-informant interviews and literature review. The study established that the institution of the National Action Committee (NAC) remains incapacitated to effectively deliver on its mandate. Its various committees are failing to convene meetings on regular basis hence issues prolong to resolve. Decision-making and role clarity among members still remain indistinct triggering undesirable conflicts. The legitimacy of the institution of the NAC also remains highly questionable, lacking legal bases to back its operations. In terms of information management, structures and systems are in place, only requiring support to make sure they thrive. Finally, financing including intersectoral coordination remains very weak and would need to be built-on, considering the potential of the coordination mechanism to enhance service delivery. A key recommendation emerging from this study is the urgent need for government to commission a review of the current multi-stakeholder platform in the best interest of aligning the coordination structure to the 2013 national constitution and national water policy.","PeriodicalId":36060,"journal":{"name":"H2Open Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H2Open Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2022.063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper sought to review the structural and operational modalities for Zimbabwe's water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector coordination architecture with an objective to identify gaps and recommend areas for further strengthening. Data were collected using a mixed-method approach involving a questionnaire survey, focus group discussions, key-informant interviews and literature review. The study established that the institution of the National Action Committee (NAC) remains incapacitated to effectively deliver on its mandate. Its various committees are failing to convene meetings on regular basis hence issues prolong to resolve. Decision-making and role clarity among members still remain indistinct triggering undesirable conflicts. The legitimacy of the institution of the NAC also remains highly questionable, lacking legal bases to back its operations. In terms of information management, structures and systems are in place, only requiring support to make sure they thrive. Finally, financing including intersectoral coordination remains very weak and would need to be built-on, considering the potential of the coordination mechanism to enhance service delivery. A key recommendation emerging from this study is the urgent need for government to commission a review of the current multi-stakeholder platform in the best interest of aligning the coordination structure to the 2013 national constitution and national water policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强水、环境卫生和个人卫生治理:对津巴布韦讲卫生部门机构安排的批判性审查
本文试图审查津巴布韦水、环境卫生和个人卫生部门协调架构的结构和运作模式,目的是找出差距并建议进一步加强的领域。采用混合方法收集数据,包括问卷调查、焦点小组讨论、关键信息者访谈和文献综述。研究表明,国家行动委员会的机构仍然无法有效履行其任务。其各委员会未能定期召开会议,因此问题迟迟得不到解决。成员之间的决策和角色明确性仍然模糊不清,从而引发了不必要的冲突。NAC机构的合法性也仍然备受质疑,缺乏支持其运作的法律依据。在信息管理方面,结构和系统已经到位,只需要支持就可以确保它们蓬勃发展。最后,考虑到协调机制加强服务提供的潜力,包括部门间协调在内的资金筹措仍然非常薄弱,需要加以加强。这项研究提出的一个关键建议是,政府迫切需要委托对当前的多方利益相关者平台进行审查,以使协调结构与2013年国家宪法和国家水政策保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
H2Open Journal
H2Open Journal Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Variations of streamflow and sediment yield in the Mosul-Makhool Basin, North of Iraq under climate change: a pre-dam construction study Assessment of soil erosion response to climate change in the Sululta catchment, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia Understanding and mitigating water resource decline in the deli watershed: a comprehensive analysis Editorial: H2Open Journal, celebrating our achievements and looking to the future Groundwater quality and human health risk assessment in urban and peri-urban regions of Jashore, Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1