Interactive Instructional: Theoretical Perspective and Its Potential Support in Stimulating Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)

R. Ulfa, Habiddin Habiddin, Y. Utomo
{"title":"Interactive Instructional: Theoretical Perspective and Its Potential Support in Stimulating Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)","authors":"R. Ulfa, Habiddin Habiddin, Y. Utomo","doi":"10.17977/um026v6i12021p001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this disruptive era, the success of teaching approaches that encourage students’ creativity and innovation is presented in students’ attained high-order thinking skills (HOTS). Consequently, the attainment of HOTS aids someone to avert negative things since they are capable of analyzing and evaluating their obtained information. Besides, HOTS also facilitates the process of students attaining knowledge, generating questions, properly interpreting information, and drawing a conclusion for an issue, with solid reasons, an open mind, and an effective means to communicate it. This article presents a theoretical study on the interactive instructional learning model and identifies its potential in accelerating students’ HOTS. It aims to introduce the interactive instructional model in chemistry learning. Further, this model can be adopted in a study with a more intensive evaluation of its empirical contribution to chemistry learning. The learning syntax for this model has been formulated for the Basic Chemistry Class 1. References Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How To Assess Higher Order thinking Skills in your classroom . Alexandria. Fearon, D. D., Copeland, D., & Saxon, T. F. (2013). The Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Creativity in a Sample of Jamaican Children. Creativity Research Journal , 25 (1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752287 Ghani, I. . B. ., Ibrahim, N. ., Yahaya, N. ., & Surif, J. (2017). Enhancing students’ HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice , 18 (4), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00120G Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2020). Probing Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills Using Pictorial Style Questions. Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering , 39 (2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2020.2133 Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2021). Examining Students’ Ability to Solve Algorithmic and Pictorial Style Questions in Chemical Kinetics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education , 19 (1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10037-w Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2018). Measuring Indonesian chemistry students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in solving chemical kinetics questions. In Y. Rahmawati & P. C. Taylor (Eds.), Empowering Science and Mathematics for Global Competitiveness; Proceedings of the Science and Mathematics International Conference (SMIC 2018) (pp. 215–222). CRC Press Taylor & Francis. Heong, Y. M., Sern, L., Kiong, T. T., & Mohamad, M. (2016). The Role of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Green Skill Development . Herunata, H., Widarti, H. R., Amalia, R., Sulistina, O., Habiddin, H., & Rosli, M. S. bin. (2020). An analysis of higher order thinking skill (HOTs) in chemistry national examination for senior high school. AIP Conference Proceedings , 2215 (1), 20009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000639 Horan, R. (2007). The Relationship Between Creativity and Intelligence: A Combined Yogic-Scientific Approach. Creativity Research Journal , 19 (2–3), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397230 Lather, A. S., Jain, S., & Shukla, A. D. (2014). Student’s Creativity in Relation to Locus of Control: a Study of Mysore University, India. The International Journal of Indian Psych ȯ logy , 2 (1), 146–165. http://ijip.in/article-details/?dip=18-01-058-20140201 Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining Higher Order Thinking. Theory Into Practice , 32 (3), 131–137. Lim, S., & Smith, J. (2008). The Structural Relationships of Parenting Style, Creative Personality, and Loneliness. Creativity Research Journal , 20 (4), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802391868 McLoughlin, D., & Mynard, J. (2009). An analysis of higher order thinking in online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 46 (2), 147–160. Narciss, S. (2007). Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880869.ch11 Paideya, V., & Sookrajh, R. (2010). Exploring the use of supplemental instruction: Supporting deep understanding and higher-order thinking in Chemistry. South African Journal of Higher Education , 24 (5), 758–770. Pannells, T. C., & Claxton, A. F. (2008). Happiness, creative ideation, and locus of control. Creativity Research Journal , 20 (1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701842029 Phakiti, A. (2018). Assessing Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Language Learning. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0380 Proske, A., Korndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2012). Interactive Learning Tasks BT  - Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (N. M. Seel (ed.); pp. 1606–1610). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1100 Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and Learning to Think . National Academy Press. Toledo, S., & Dubas, J. M. (2016). Encouraging Higher-Order Thinking in General Chemistry by Scaffolding Student Learning Using Marzano’s Taxonomy. Journal of Chemical Education , 93 (1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00184 Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge Regarding Instruction of Higher Order Thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 15 (4), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000048332.39591.e3 Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences , 12 (3), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1 Zoller, U, & Dori, Y. J. (2002). Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: performance and attitudes of college students. International Journal of Science Education , 24 (2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049060 Zoller, Uri, & Pushkin, D. (2007). Matching Higher-Order Cognitive Skills (HOCS) promotion goals with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice , 8 (2), 153–171","PeriodicalId":33201,"journal":{"name":"JPEK Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPEK Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v6i12021p001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this disruptive era, the success of teaching approaches that encourage students’ creativity and innovation is presented in students’ attained high-order thinking skills (HOTS). Consequently, the attainment of HOTS aids someone to avert negative things since they are capable of analyzing and evaluating their obtained information. Besides, HOTS also facilitates the process of students attaining knowledge, generating questions, properly interpreting information, and drawing a conclusion for an issue, with solid reasons, an open mind, and an effective means to communicate it. This article presents a theoretical study on the interactive instructional learning model and identifies its potential in accelerating students’ HOTS. It aims to introduce the interactive instructional model in chemistry learning. Further, this model can be adopted in a study with a more intensive evaluation of its empirical contribution to chemistry learning. The learning syntax for this model has been formulated for the Basic Chemistry Class 1. References Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How To Assess Higher Order thinking Skills in your classroom . Alexandria. Fearon, D. D., Copeland, D., & Saxon, T. F. (2013). The Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Creativity in a Sample of Jamaican Children. Creativity Research Journal , 25 (1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752287 Ghani, I. . B. ., Ibrahim, N. ., Yahaya, N. ., & Surif, J. (2017). Enhancing students’ HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice , 18 (4), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00120G Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2020). Probing Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills Using Pictorial Style Questions. Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering , 39 (2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2020.2133 Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2021). Examining Students’ Ability to Solve Algorithmic and Pictorial Style Questions in Chemical Kinetics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education , 19 (1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10037-w Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2018). Measuring Indonesian chemistry students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in solving chemical kinetics questions. In Y. Rahmawati & P. C. Taylor (Eds.), Empowering Science and Mathematics for Global Competitiveness; Proceedings of the Science and Mathematics International Conference (SMIC 2018) (pp. 215–222). CRC Press Taylor & Francis. Heong, Y. M., Sern, L., Kiong, T. T., & Mohamad, M. (2016). The Role of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Green Skill Development . Herunata, H., Widarti, H. R., Amalia, R., Sulistina, O., Habiddin, H., & Rosli, M. S. bin. (2020). An analysis of higher order thinking skill (HOTs) in chemistry national examination for senior high school. AIP Conference Proceedings , 2215 (1), 20009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000639 Horan, R. (2007). The Relationship Between Creativity and Intelligence: A Combined Yogic-Scientific Approach. Creativity Research Journal , 19 (2–3), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397230 Lather, A. S., Jain, S., & Shukla, A. D. (2014). Student’s Creativity in Relation to Locus of Control: a Study of Mysore University, India. The International Journal of Indian Psych ȯ logy , 2 (1), 146–165. http://ijip.in/article-details/?dip=18-01-058-20140201 Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining Higher Order Thinking. Theory Into Practice , 32 (3), 131–137. Lim, S., & Smith, J. (2008). The Structural Relationships of Parenting Style, Creative Personality, and Loneliness. Creativity Research Journal , 20 (4), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802391868 McLoughlin, D., & Mynard, J. (2009). An analysis of higher order thinking in online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 46 (2), 147–160. Narciss, S. (2007). Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880869.ch11 Paideya, V., & Sookrajh, R. (2010). Exploring the use of supplemental instruction: Supporting deep understanding and higher-order thinking in Chemistry. South African Journal of Higher Education , 24 (5), 758–770. Pannells, T. C., & Claxton, A. F. (2008). Happiness, creative ideation, and locus of control. Creativity Research Journal , 20 (1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701842029 Phakiti, A. (2018). Assessing Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Language Learning. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0380 Proske, A., Korndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2012). Interactive Learning Tasks BT  - Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (N. M. Seel (ed.); pp. 1606–1610). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1100 Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and Learning to Think . National Academy Press. Toledo, S., & Dubas, J. M. (2016). Encouraging Higher-Order Thinking in General Chemistry by Scaffolding Student Learning Using Marzano’s Taxonomy. Journal of Chemical Education , 93 (1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00184 Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge Regarding Instruction of Higher Order Thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 15 (4), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000048332.39591.e3 Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences , 12 (3), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1 Zoller, U, & Dori, Y. J. (2002). Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: performance and attitudes of college students. International Journal of Science Education , 24 (2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049060 Zoller, Uri, & Pushkin, D. (2007). Matching Higher-Order Cognitive Skills (HOCS) promotion goals with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice , 8 (2), 153–171
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互动教学:激发学生高阶思维能力的理论视角及其潜在支持
在这个颠覆性的时代,鼓励学生创造力和创新的教学方法的成功体现在学生获得的高阶思维技能(HOTS)上。因此,HOTS的实现有助于人们避免负面的事情,因为他们能够分析和评估他们获得的信息。此外,HOTS还促进了学生获得知识、提出问题、正确解释信息和对问题得出结论的过程,有充分的理由、开放的心态和有效的沟通手段。本文对交互式教学学习模式进行了理论研究,并确定了其在促进学生HOTS方面的潜力。旨在介绍化学学习中的互动教学模式。此外,该模型可以用于更深入地评估其对化学学习的实证贡献的研究。该模型的学习语法已为基础化学1班制定。参考文献Brookhart,S.M.(2010)。如何在课堂上评估高阶思维技能。亚历山大。Fearon,D.、Copeland,D.和Saxon,T.F.(2013)。牙买加儿童育儿方式与创造力的关系。《创造力研究杂志》,25(1),119–128。https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752287Ghani,I..B.,Ibrahim,N..,Yahaya,N..和Surif,J.(2017)。通过使用概念图作为替代评估工具,在实验室教育活动中提高学生的HOTS。化学教育研究与实践,18(4),849-874。https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00120GHabiddin,H.和Page,E.M.(2020)。运用图式问题探究学生的高阶思维能力。马其顿化学与化学工程杂志,39(2),251–263。https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2020.2133Habiddin,H.和Page,E.M.(2021)。考察学生解决化学动力学中的算法和图示风格问题的能力。《国际科学与数学教育杂志》,19(1),65-85。https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10037-wHabiddin,H.和Page,E.M.(2018)。测量印尼化学学生解决化学动力学问题的高阶思维技能。Y.Rahmawati和P.C.Taylor(编辑),《增强科学和数学的全球竞争力》;《科学与数学国际会议论文集》(SMIC 2018)(第215–222页)。CRC Press Taylor&Francis。Heong,Y.M.、Sern,L.、Kiong,T.T.和Mohamad,M.(2016)。高阶思维技能在绿色技能发展中的作用。Herunata,H.、Widarti,H.R.、Amalia,R.、Sulistina,O.、Habiddin,H.和Rosli,M.S.bin。(2020)。高中化学高考高阶思维能力分析。AIP会议记录,2215(1),20009。https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000639Horan,R.(2007)。创造力和智力之间的关系:瑜伽科学的综合方法。《创造力研究杂志》,19(2-3),179-202。https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397230Lather,A.S.、Jain,S.和Shukla,A.D.(2014)。学生的创造力与控制点的关系:印度迈索尔大学的研究。国际印度心理学杂志,2(1),146-165。http://ijip.in/article-details/?dip=18-01-058-2014 0201 Lewis,A.和Smith,D.(1993)。定义高阶思维。理论转化为实践,32(3),131–137。Lim,S.和Smith,J.(2008)。父母教养方式、创造性人格与孤独感的结构关系。《创造力研究杂志》,20(4),412–419。https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802391868McLoughlin,D.和Mynard,J.(2009)。在线讨论中的高阶思维分析。《国际教育教学创新》,46(2),147-160。Narciss,S.(2007)。交互式学习任务的反馈策略。《教育传播与技术研究手册》。劳特利奇。https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880869.ch11Paideya,V.和Sookrajh,R.(2010)。探索补充教学的使用:支持化学中的深入理解和高阶思维。《南非高等教育杂志》,24(5),758–770。Pannells,T.C.和Claxton,A.F.(2008)。快乐、创造性思维和控制点。《创造力研究杂志》,20(1),67–71。https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701842029Phakiti,A.(2018)。评估语言学习中的高阶思维技能。在TESOL英语教学百科全书(第1-7页)。https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0380Proske,A.、Korndle,H.和Narciss,S.(2012)。交互式学习任务BT-学习科学百科全书(N.M.Seel主编);第1606-1610页)。施普林格美国。https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1100雷斯尼克,L.B.(1987)。教育和学习思考。美国国家科学院出版社。Toledo,S.和Dubas,J.M。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of The Use of Analogy of Chemical Education Students on The Concept of Chemical Bond Adaptation of Basic Chemistry Learning with Green Chemistry Oriented Diagnostic Test on Chemical Equilibrium Misconception: A Literature Review Implementation of Hy-Bon Edugame Based on Gender of Students' Learning Interest In Hydrocarbon The Relationship Between Self-Regulated Learning and Technology Literacy With Conceptual Understanding of Salt Hydrolysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1