Validation of an epilepsy management smartphone application in Pakistan.

IF 1.2 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Epileptologica Pub Date : 2022-02-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s42494-021-00075-9
Victor Patterson, Awais Bashir Larik, Mohamed Zaman Soomro, Steve Coates
{"title":"Validation of an epilepsy management smartphone application in Pakistan.","authors":"Victor Patterson, Awais Bashir Larik, Mohamed Zaman Soomro, Steve Coates","doi":"10.1186/s42494-021-00075-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no single way to improve epilepsy care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). An epilepsy management aid application (app) has been described, which enables a non-physician health worker (NPHW) to communicate with an epilepsy specialist using a smartphone. In this study, we aimed to assess the validity and quality of this care system in building connections between NPHWs and specialists in Pakistan and the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A NPHW in Pakistan used the app on a series of referrals and sent the app-generated summary by email to a neurologist in the UK, who replied and suggested possible management. Patients were later seen in a face-to-face (FF) manner by the UK neurologist and a local neurologist, and diagnostic accuracy and quality parameters were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 10 months, 59 patients were recruited and 33 of them were available for FF assessment. The misdiagnosis rate of the app was 6% (2 cases). Treatment advice provided by the app was judged appropriate in 32 patients (97%). In addition, 46% of the referrals were completed within 2 h and 85% within 24 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with an earlier study, this system is a safe method to provide care for patients who cannot access neurological services in person. In addition, it has advantage of timeliness compared to FF assessment and requires less specialist time, both of which are especially important during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This system can be generalised easily, depending on the willingness of referrers and specialists to use it.</p>","PeriodicalId":33628,"journal":{"name":"Acta Epileptologica","volume":" ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Epileptologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42494-021-00075-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no single way to improve epilepsy care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). An epilepsy management aid application (app) has been described, which enables a non-physician health worker (NPHW) to communicate with an epilepsy specialist using a smartphone. In this study, we aimed to assess the validity and quality of this care system in building connections between NPHWs and specialists in Pakistan and the UK.

Methods: A NPHW in Pakistan used the app on a series of referrals and sent the app-generated summary by email to a neurologist in the UK, who replied and suggested possible management. Patients were later seen in a face-to-face (FF) manner by the UK neurologist and a local neurologist, and diagnostic accuracy and quality parameters were assessed.

Results: Over 10 months, 59 patients were recruited and 33 of them were available for FF assessment. The misdiagnosis rate of the app was 6% (2 cases). Treatment advice provided by the app was judged appropriate in 32 patients (97%). In addition, 46% of the referrals were completed within 2 h and 85% within 24 h.

Conclusions: Consistent with an earlier study, this system is a safe method to provide care for patients who cannot access neurological services in person. In addition, it has advantage of timeliness compared to FF assessment and requires less specialist time, both of which are especially important during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This system can be generalised easily, depending on the willingness of referrers and specialists to use it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦癫痫管理智能手机应用程序的验证
背景:在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),没有单一的方法来改善癫痫护理。描述了一种癫痫管理辅助应用程序(app),它使非医师卫生工作者(NPHW)能够使用智能手机与癫痫专家进行通信。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估该护理系统在巴基斯坦和英国的nphw和专家之间建立联系的有效性和质量。方法:巴基斯坦的一名NPHW在一系列转诊中使用该应用程序,并通过电子邮件将应用程序生成的摘要发送给英国的一名神经科医生,后者回复并建议可能的管理方法。患者随后由英国神经科医生和当地神经科医生以面对面(FF)的方式就诊,并评估诊断的准确性和质量参数。结果:在10个月的时间里,共招募59例患者,其中33例可用于FF评估。app误诊率为6%(2例)。32名患者(97%)认为该应用程序提供的治疗建议是合适的。此外,46%的转诊在2小时内完成,85%在24小时内完成。结论:与早期的研究一致,该系统是一种安全的方法,可以为无法亲自获得神经系统服务的患者提供护理。此外,与FF评估相比,它具有时效性优势,所需的专家时间较少,这两点在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间尤为重要。这个系统可以很容易地推广,这取决于转诊者和专家使用它的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Epileptologica
Acta Epileptologica Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of cognitive impairment in drug-resistant epilepsy: the role of interictal EEG abnormalities. Gray matter density alterations in idiopathic generalized epilepsy patients: a double inversion recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging study. Semiological differences of functional seizures between pediatrics and adults: video electroencephalography analysis. Quantitative EEG and dysautonomia in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Medication adherence in epilepsy: the role of adverse drug reactions and patient knowledge-attitude-behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1