Assessment of level IIB lymph nodes in oral cancer - Should we spare or care?

S. Shanmugam, S. Susikar, Arun Victor Jebasingh
{"title":"Assessment of level IIB lymph nodes in oral cancer - Should we spare or care?","authors":"S. Shanmugam, S. Susikar, Arun Victor Jebasingh","doi":"10.25259/asjo-2022-40-(395)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extent of neck dissection over the years has evolved from a radical neck dissection to a super-selective neck dissection with an attempt to achieve a balance between oncological safety and acceptable morbidity. There is an ongoing debate concerning dissection of level IIB in both node negative and positive patients, primarily due to the low incidence of metastasis in this region and possible spinal accessory nerve injury. In this study, we intended to find the rate of metastasis to level IIB nodes in patients who were treated with neck dissection for oral cancers.\n\n\n\nPatients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who underwent neck dissection were analyzed. Patients with clinically node negative (cN0) disease underwent selective neck dissection (SND), whereas patients with clinically node positive (cN+) disease underwent modified radical neck dissection (MRND).\n\n\n\nOut of the total 34 patients, 12 patients underwent MRND and 22 patients underwent SND. In the MRND group, three patients (25%) had positive level IIB nodes. The median number of IIB nodes removed was two and the median number of positive IIB nodes was one. In the SND group, the median number of IIB nodes removed was three and none of the patients had positive level IIB node.\n\n\n\nIn oral cancer with cN+, routine dissection of level IIB nodes has both therapeutic and prognostic values. Whereas, in patients with cN0, routine dissection of level IIB nodes can be omitted. Further large volume studies are needed on cN0 disease.","PeriodicalId":31357,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Oncology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/asjo-2022-40-(395)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent of neck dissection over the years has evolved from a radical neck dissection to a super-selective neck dissection with an attempt to achieve a balance between oncological safety and acceptable morbidity. There is an ongoing debate concerning dissection of level IIB in both node negative and positive patients, primarily due to the low incidence of metastasis in this region and possible spinal accessory nerve injury. In this study, we intended to find the rate of metastasis to level IIB nodes in patients who were treated with neck dissection for oral cancers. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who underwent neck dissection were analyzed. Patients with clinically node negative (cN0) disease underwent selective neck dissection (SND), whereas patients with clinically node positive (cN+) disease underwent modified radical neck dissection (MRND). Out of the total 34 patients, 12 patients underwent MRND and 22 patients underwent SND. In the MRND group, three patients (25%) had positive level IIB nodes. The median number of IIB nodes removed was two and the median number of positive IIB nodes was one. In the SND group, the median number of IIB nodes removed was three and none of the patients had positive level IIB node. In oral cancer with cN+, routine dissection of level IIB nodes has both therapeutic and prognostic values. Whereas, in patients with cN0, routine dissection of level IIB nodes can be omitted. Further large volume studies are needed on cN0 disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔癌患者IIB级淋巴结的评估——我们应该保留还是护理?
多年来,颈部清扫的范围已经从根治性颈部清扫发展到超选择性颈部清扫,试图在肿瘤安全性和可接受的发病率之间取得平衡。对于淋巴结阴性和阳性患者是否需要切除IIB水平仍有争议,主要是由于该区域转移的发生率较低以及可能的脊髓副神经损伤。在这项研究中,我们旨在发现在口腔癌患者接受颈部清扫治疗的IIB级淋巴结的转移率。本文对口腔鳞状细胞癌行颈部清扫术的患者进行了分析。临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)患者行选择性颈部清扫(SND),而临床淋巴结阳性(cN+)患者行改良根治性颈部清扫(MRND)。在34例患者中,12例患者发生MRND, 22例患者发生SND。在MRND组中,3名患者(25%)有IIB级淋巴结阳性。切除IIB淋巴结的中位数为2,阳性IIB淋巴结的中位数为1。在SND组中,切除IIB淋巴结的中位数为3个,没有患者出现阳性水平的IIB淋巴结。在cN+口腔癌中,常规切除IIB级淋巴结具有治疗和预后价值。然而,在cN0患者中,可以省略常规的IIB级淋巴结清扫。需要对cN0疾病进行进一步的大量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Equitable and affordable cancer program in Assam: An initiative of Tata trusts and Government of Assam BCOR overexpression in pediatric sarcomas- a morphologic continuum of mixed round and spindle cell tumors Assessment of swallowing dysfunction using fees (flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing) in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy Hodgkin lymphoma and bone marrow tuberculosis: A coincidence Barriers to timely lung cancer diagnosis and treatment in a Philippine tertiary hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1