Use of Mixed Methods in Emotional/Behavioral Disorders Intervention Research

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-03-14 DOI:10.1177/01987429231160283
M. Conroy, David E. Houchins, J. Hitchcock, J. Anderson
{"title":"Use of Mixed Methods in Emotional/Behavioral Disorders Intervention Research","authors":"M. Conroy, David E. Houchins, J. Hitchcock, J. Anderson","doi":"10.1177/01987429231160283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, mixed methods research (MMR) is used in special education, although the extent to which MMR is used in intervention research in the field of emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD) remains unknown. The purpose of this article is to examine the use of MMR in EBD intervention research to describe its application within the field. We conducted a targeted review of two prominent journals to assess the use of MMR over the last 20 years in the field. Following the identification of MMR intervention studies, we applied several frameworks to describe the application of MMR across identified studies. Results of this targeted review indicate that very few EBD intervention studies used MMR. Most studies used singular quantitative approaches (e.g., group experimental or single case research design) and only a small portion used qualitative methods. We did find a number of studies using multimethods by combining two or more quantitative approaches. Our assertion is that researchers consider increasing their use of MMR to advance the science in the field of EBD and to gain a better understanding of the “why” and “how” interventions are or are not effective.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429231160283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Increasingly, mixed methods research (MMR) is used in special education, although the extent to which MMR is used in intervention research in the field of emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD) remains unknown. The purpose of this article is to examine the use of MMR in EBD intervention research to describe its application within the field. We conducted a targeted review of two prominent journals to assess the use of MMR over the last 20 years in the field. Following the identification of MMR intervention studies, we applied several frameworks to describe the application of MMR across identified studies. Results of this targeted review indicate that very few EBD intervention studies used MMR. Most studies used singular quantitative approaches (e.g., group experimental or single case research design) and only a small portion used qualitative methods. We did find a number of studies using multimethods by combining two or more quantitative approaches. Our assertion is that researchers consider increasing their use of MMR to advance the science in the field of EBD and to gain a better understanding of the “why” and “how” interventions are or are not effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合方法在情绪/行为障碍干预研究中的应用
混合方法研究(MMR)越来越多地用于特殊教育,尽管MMR在情感/行为障碍(EBD)领域的干预研究中的使用程度尚不清楚。本文的目的是检验MMR在循证医学干预研究中的应用,以描述其在该领域的应用。我们对两本著名期刊进行了有针对性的综述,以评估过去20年MMR在该领域的使用情况。在确定MMR干预研究之后,我们应用了几个框架来描述MMR在已确定研究中的应用。这篇有针对性的综述的结果表明,很少有EBD干预研究使用MMR。大多数研究使用单一的定量方法(例如,小组实验或单一案例研究设计),只有一小部分使用定性方法。我们确实发现了许多使用多种方法结合两种或多种定量方法的研究。我们的主张是,研究人员考虑增加MMR的使用,以推进EBD领域的科学,并更好地了解干预措施的“为什么”和“如何”有效或无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1