Outcomes of Intra-Medullary Square Nail for Adult Both Bone Forearm Shaft Fractures

Dixit Savajiyani, Nishant Chauhan, Shailesh D. Ramavat
{"title":"Outcomes of Intra-Medullary Square Nail for Adult Both Bone Forearm Shaft Fractures","authors":"Dixit Savajiyani, Nishant Chauhan, Shailesh D. Ramavat","doi":"10.18502/jost.v9i3.13021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Forearm shaft fractures are common in developing countries. Anatomical reduction of these fractures using plates and screws is considered an accepted treatment mode. Like other shaft fractures, this can be treated with intramedullary nails like square nails, Rush nails, and interlocking nails. This study evaluates radiological and functional treatment results using square nailing. \nMethods: A prospective study was conducted on 100 adult patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures over 3 years. Out of 100 patients, 68 were men, and 32 were women. Patients were followed up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and then every 3 months till 1 to 1.5 years. We have used criteria described by Anderson et al. and the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score for functional evaluation of the patients. \nResults: Out of 100 patients, the union was achieved in 88 patients, while the rest 12 patients required re-surgery. 4 patients had delayed union, 4 patients developed an infection at the ulnar entry site, and 3 patients developed bursitis of olecranon bursa. \nConclusion: Intramedullary nailing of both bone forearm shaft fractures using square nails can give satisfactory results in most cases, comparable with treatment by plates and screws, and provides an alternative, cost-effective treatment of both bone forearm shafts fractures with good cosmesis owing to small incisions.","PeriodicalId":34870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v9i3.13021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Forearm shaft fractures are common in developing countries. Anatomical reduction of these fractures using plates and screws is considered an accepted treatment mode. Like other shaft fractures, this can be treated with intramedullary nails like square nails, Rush nails, and interlocking nails. This study evaluates radiological and functional treatment results using square nailing. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 100 adult patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures over 3 years. Out of 100 patients, 68 were men, and 32 were women. Patients were followed up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and then every 3 months till 1 to 1.5 years. We have used criteria described by Anderson et al. and the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score for functional evaluation of the patients. Results: Out of 100 patients, the union was achieved in 88 patients, while the rest 12 patients required re-surgery. 4 patients had delayed union, 4 patients developed an infection at the ulnar entry site, and 3 patients developed bursitis of olecranon bursa. Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing of both bone forearm shaft fractures using square nails can give satisfactory results in most cases, comparable with treatment by plates and screws, and provides an alternative, cost-effective treatment of both bone forearm shafts fractures with good cosmesis owing to small incisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髓内方钉治疗成人前臂双骨骨折的疗效
背景:前臂干骨折在发展中国家很常见。使用钢板和螺钉对这些骨折进行解剖复位被认为是一种公认的治疗方式。像其他轴骨折一样,这可以用髓内钉治疗,如方钉、Rush钉和联锁钉。本研究评估使用方钉治疗的放射学和功能效果。方法:对100例成年前臂骨干骨折患者进行为期3年的前瞻性研究。100名患者中,男性68名,女性32名。随访时间分别为2周、6周、8周,之后每3个月随访1 ~ 1.5年。我们使用Anderson等人描述的标准和缩短版的手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(QuickDASH)评分来评估患者的功能。结果:100例患者中,88例患者愈合,其余12例患者需再次手术。4例延迟愈合,4例尺骨入路感染,3例鹰嘴滑囊炎。结论:采用方钉髓内钉治疗双骨小臂骨折,大多数病例疗效满意,可与钢板和螺钉治疗相媲美,为双骨小臂骨折提供了一种可替代的、经济有效的治疗方法,且切口小,美观性好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Study of Titanium Elastic Nailing in Forearm Fractures in Elderly Patients Bilateral Asymmetrical Hip Dislocations after Falling from Height: A Case Report and Literature Review Bilateral Radial Head and Neck Nondisplaced Fracture, a Challenge for Treatment: A Case Report Open Soft Tissue Degloving Injuries of Lower Limbs Managed by a Staged Protocol Using Preserved Autologous Skin Graft Comparison of Different Ketofol Procedural Sedation and Analgesic Doses during Orthopedic Procedures in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1