‘An Authority from which there can be no appeal’: The place of Cicero in Hume's science of man

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY Journal of Scottish Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.3366/jsp.2020.0278
Tim Stuart-Buttle
{"title":"‘An Authority from which there can be no appeal’: The place of Cicero in Hume's science of man","authors":"Tim Stuart-Buttle","doi":"10.3366/jsp.2020.0278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hume's admiration for the Roman philosopher and statesman, Cicero, is well-known. Yet scholars have largely overlooked how Hume's interpretation of Cicero – initially as a Stoic, and subsequently as an academic sceptic – evolved with Hume's own intellectual development. Moreover, scholars tend to focus on Hume's debts to Cicero with regard either to his epistemological scepticism or his philosophy of religion. This essay suggests instead that Hume's engagement with Cicero was at its most intense, and productive, when evaluating the relationship between morality and religious belief. Closer attention to the place of Cicero in Hume's writings illuminates our understanding of Hume's intellectual development, particularly in the crucial pre- Treatise years. It also, however, shines light on Hume's interpretation of the history of occidental philosophy (not least the consequences of its engagements with Christian theology), and on how Hume saw his own work to relate to this history.","PeriodicalId":41417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2020.0278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hume's admiration for the Roman philosopher and statesman, Cicero, is well-known. Yet scholars have largely overlooked how Hume's interpretation of Cicero – initially as a Stoic, and subsequently as an academic sceptic – evolved with Hume's own intellectual development. Moreover, scholars tend to focus on Hume's debts to Cicero with regard either to his epistemological scepticism or his philosophy of religion. This essay suggests instead that Hume's engagement with Cicero was at its most intense, and productive, when evaluating the relationship between morality and religious belief. Closer attention to the place of Cicero in Hume's writings illuminates our understanding of Hume's intellectual development, particularly in the crucial pre- Treatise years. It also, however, shines light on Hume's interpretation of the history of occidental philosophy (not least the consequences of its engagements with Christian theology), and on how Hume saw his own work to relate to this history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一种无法诉诸的权威”:西塞罗在休谟人学中的地位
休谟对罗马哲学家和政治家西塞罗的崇拜是众所周知的。然而,学者们在很大程度上忽视了休谟对西塞罗的解释——最初作为斯多葛派,后来作为学术怀疑论者——是如何随着休谟自己的智力发展而演变的。此外,学者们倾向于关注休谟对西塞罗的债务,无论是在他的认识论怀疑主义方面还是在他的宗教哲学方面。这篇文章表明,休谟与西塞罗的接触在评估道德与宗教信仰之间的关系时是最激烈、最富有成效的。更密切地关注西塞罗在休谟作品中的地位,有助于我们理解休谟的智力发展,特别是在《人性论》之前的关键时期。然而,它也照亮了休谟对西方哲学史的解释(不仅仅是它与基督教神学接触的后果),以及休谟如何看待自己的作品与这段历史的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Maximalising Providence: Samuel Rutherford's Augustinian Transformation of Scotist Scholasticism Archibald Pitcairne and the Newtonian Turn of Medical Philosophy Robert Balfour and William Chalmers on the Essence, Existence and Aptness of Accidents New Studies on Seventeenth-Century Scottish Philosophy Direct or Indirect Scotism? Seventeenth-Century Scottish Scholasticism and the Case of James Sibbald (1595–1647)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1