Chronicle of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION International Review of Administrative Sciences Pub Date : 2021-11-26 DOI:10.1177/00208523211058651
S. Sahraoui
{"title":"Chronicle of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences","authors":"S. Sahraoui","doi":"10.1177/00208523211058651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Managing the “Opportunity of the Covid-19 crisis” at the International Institute of Administrative Sciences Public administration will never be the same during and after Covid-19—if there is ever an after Covid-19. Sabine Kuhlman, International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS) Vice President for Western Europe, developed along with a number of colleagues (Kuhlmann et al., 2021), a cross-country comparative analysis in the September 2021 special issue of the International Review of Administrative Sciences (IRAS) on “Testing the crisis: Opportunity management and governance of the Covid-19 pandemic”. The comparison shows that opportunities arise during crises and the extent of these opportunities increases with the magnitude of the crisis. Needless to say that the Covid-19 crisis is a global cataclysm of a magnitude hardly seen before. Its longevity makes is all the more trying for a variety of actors including governments and public administration. The opportunities are, however, immense as well. According to Kuhlman and her co-authors, “opportunity management” by various political and administrative actors will depend on both institutional factors and individual ones. Institutional factors consist of the institutional starting conditions, administrative cultures and historical path dependencies. Individual factors consist of the strategies of actors who will see in the crisis a welcome opportunity to demonstrate leadership and effective governance. In these annual chronicles, and other than referring the reader to the excellent special issue of IRAS and in particular Kuhlman et al.’s contribution, I would like to review the work of the IIAS during this year and plans for the years ahead in terms of the conceptual framework laid out by the guest editors to the special issue. How did the IIAS, through the agency of its secretariat, manage opportunities arising from the Covid-19 crisis. It goes without saying that the special issue is about managing the health crisis itself at the","PeriodicalId":47811,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Administrative Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211058651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing the “Opportunity of the Covid-19 crisis” at the International Institute of Administrative Sciences Public administration will never be the same during and after Covid-19—if there is ever an after Covid-19. Sabine Kuhlman, International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS) Vice President for Western Europe, developed along with a number of colleagues (Kuhlmann et al., 2021), a cross-country comparative analysis in the September 2021 special issue of the International Review of Administrative Sciences (IRAS) on “Testing the crisis: Opportunity management and governance of the Covid-19 pandemic”. The comparison shows that opportunities arise during crises and the extent of these opportunities increases with the magnitude of the crisis. Needless to say that the Covid-19 crisis is a global cataclysm of a magnitude hardly seen before. Its longevity makes is all the more trying for a variety of actors including governments and public administration. The opportunities are, however, immense as well. According to Kuhlman and her co-authors, “opportunity management” by various political and administrative actors will depend on both institutional factors and individual ones. Institutional factors consist of the institutional starting conditions, administrative cultures and historical path dependencies. Individual factors consist of the strategies of actors who will see in the crisis a welcome opportunity to demonstrate leadership and effective governance. In these annual chronicles, and other than referring the reader to the excellent special issue of IRAS and in particular Kuhlman et al.’s contribution, I would like to review the work of the IIAS during this year and plans for the years ahead in terms of the conceptual framework laid out by the guest editors to the special issue. How did the IIAS, through the agency of its secretariat, manage opportunities arising from the Covid-19 crisis. It goes without saying that the special issue is about managing the health crisis itself at the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际行政科学研究所编年史
国际行政科学研究所管理“新冠肺炎危机的机遇”如果有“后新冠肺炎”,公共行政在新冠肺炎期间和之后将永远不会相同。国际行政科学研究所(IIAS)负责西欧事务的副院长Sabine Kuhlman与一些同事(Kuhlmann等人,2021年)在《国际行政科学评论》(IRAS) 2021年9月特刊上发表了一篇关于“考验危机:Covid-19大流行的机会管理和治理”的跨国比较分析。比较表明,机会出现在危机期间,这些机会的程度随着危机的严重程度而增加。毋庸置疑,新冠肺炎危机是一场前所未有的全球性灾难。它的长期存在使得包括政府和公共行政部门在内的各种行为者更加艰难。然而,机遇也是巨大的。根据库尔曼和她的合著者的说法,各种政治和行政行为者的“机会管理”将取决于制度因素和个人因素。制度因素包括制度起始条件、行政文化和历史路径依赖。个别因素包括行为者的战略,这些行为者将在危机中看到展示领导力和有效治理的可喜机会。在这些年度编年史中,除了向读者介绍IRAS的优秀特刊,特别是Kuhlman等人的贡献外,我想回顾一下ias今年的工作,并根据特刊的客座编辑提出的概念框架为未来几年做计划。国际投资协定如何通过秘书处管理新冠肺炎危机带来的机遇?毫无疑问,这一特刊是关于管理卫生危机本身的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: IRAS is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to academic and professional public administration. Founded in 1927 it is the oldest scholarly public administration journal specifically focused on comparative and international topics. IRAS seeks to shape the future agenda of public administration around the world by encouraging reflection on international comparisons, new techniques and approaches, the dialogue between academics and practitioners, and debates about the future of the field itself.
期刊最新文献
Is bureaucracy ironclad after all? Prevalence and variances of performance- and strategy-oriented management in German local governments A three-model approach to understand social media-mediated transparency in public administrations Board gender diversity in municipally owned corporations: A resource dependence perspective Organizational learning capacity and international development project success in West Africa: A case study The autonomy and governance of mutual aid organizations for civil servants’ welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1