Comprehension Analysis on the Discourse Marker Function of English -ly Type Epistemic Stance Adverbials

Youra Lee, Seok-Hoon You
{"title":"Comprehension Analysis on the Discourse Marker\n Function of English -ly Type Epistemic Stance Adverbials","authors":"Youra Lee, Seok-Hoon You","doi":"10.30961/LR.2020.56.3.383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English -ly adverbials (LY) with epistemic modality are frequently used as discourse markers (DM) in spoken language. In this paper, LY DM is defined as an epistemic stance marker. The experiment for this study aims to analyze Korean EFL learners' comprehension of LY used as a DM on the basis of the hypothesis that they would perceive LY differently from how English native speakers perceive them. In order to conduct the experiment, previous studies on DMs were thoroughly examined to establish the theoretical framework. Based on the framework, the Discourse Marker Interpretation Test (DMIT) was designed. The research data collected through the test were analyzed using quantitative methods. Additionally, interviews were conducted to supplement the interpretation of the research results. The experiment mainly determined that, unlike English native speakers, who properly interpreted LY with their DM function, Korean EFL learners are inclined to interpret LY used as DMs simply with their lexical meanings (the dictionary definition). Results suggest that there is a high possibility for Korean EFL learners to commit more errors when encountering LY DMs.","PeriodicalId":89433,"journal":{"name":"Language research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30961/LR.2020.56.3.383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English -ly adverbials (LY) with epistemic modality are frequently used as discourse markers (DM) in spoken language. In this paper, LY DM is defined as an epistemic stance marker. The experiment for this study aims to analyze Korean EFL learners' comprehension of LY used as a DM on the basis of the hypothesis that they would perceive LY differently from how English native speakers perceive them. In order to conduct the experiment, previous studies on DMs were thoroughly examined to establish the theoretical framework. Based on the framework, the Discourse Marker Interpretation Test (DMIT) was designed. The research data collected through the test were analyzed using quantitative methods. Additionally, interviews were conducted to supplement the interpretation of the research results. The experiment mainly determined that, unlike English native speakers, who properly interpreted LY with their DM function, Korean EFL learners are inclined to interpret LY used as DMs simply with their lexical meanings (the dictionary definition). Results suggest that there is a high possibility for Korean EFL learners to commit more errors when encountering LY DMs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语型认知状态副词语篇标记功能的理解分析
具有认知情态的英语LY状语是口语中常用的话语标记语。本文将LY DM定义为认知立场标记。本研究的实验旨在分析韩国英语学习者对作为DM的LY的理解,假设他们对LY的感知与英语母语者的感知不同。为了进行实验,我们对以往的研究进行了深入的研究,以建立理论框架。基于该框架,设计了话语标记语解释测试(DMIT)。通过试验收集的研究数据采用定量方法进行分析。此外,还进行了访谈,以补充研究结果的解释。实验主要确定,与母语为英语的人通过其DM功能正确地解释LY不同,韩国英语学习者倾向于简单地通过词汇意义(字典定义)来解释作为DM使用的LY。结果表明,韩国英语学习者在遇到LY - dm时更容易犯错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Causative Projections in Mandarin Chinese Chinese Word Order and the Two Typological “Exceptions”: A Scalar Approach On the Syntax of Unusual Subjects: Exceptional Case Marking Constructions Exploring VP/vP Preposing in Multiple Nominative Constructions A Case Study on English Test Item Development Training for Secondary School Teachers Using AI Tools: Focusing on ChatGPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1