Dynamics of PPP investment in energy and country governance: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Built Environment Project and Asset Management Pub Date : 2022-09-23 DOI:10.1108/bepam-12-2021-0141
A. Ahmed, I. Musonda, J. Pretorius
{"title":"Dynamics of PPP investment in energy and country governance: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"A. Ahmed, I. Musonda, J. Pretorius","doi":"10.1108/bepam-12-2021-0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper intends to investigate the empirical link between governance and energy investment in PPP. To succinctly account for biases in the fixed effects (FE) model, the authors adopted different bias-corrected techniques. The majority of these techniques provided evidence that PPP investments in energy are boosted by increasing the desire for accountability, prioritising the voice of the masses and disabusing the rule of laws. This study could not find any positive influence from the control of corruption to PPP investment in energy.Design/methodology/approachThe acute shortage of power supply in SSA has attracted PPP investments in the energy subsector of the economy, leading to the recent debate on governance and public, private investment. The authors contributed to this argument by examining the impact of country governance on PPP investment in energy using a sample of countries in SSA.FindingsTherefore, the authors concluded that low control of corruption is responsible for the inadequate volume of PPP investments. In the light of this, the government should redefine the anti-corruption bill of their sovereignty to accommodate severe sanctions when necessary.Originality/valueThis paper uses the fixed effects (FE) model by introducing batteries of nonlinear panel models to capture the relationship between the impacts of country governance on PPP investment in energy.","PeriodicalId":46426,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-12-2021-0141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis paper intends to investigate the empirical link between governance and energy investment in PPP. To succinctly account for biases in the fixed effects (FE) model, the authors adopted different bias-corrected techniques. The majority of these techniques provided evidence that PPP investments in energy are boosted by increasing the desire for accountability, prioritising the voice of the masses and disabusing the rule of laws. This study could not find any positive influence from the control of corruption to PPP investment in energy.Design/methodology/approachThe acute shortage of power supply in SSA has attracted PPP investments in the energy subsector of the economy, leading to the recent debate on governance and public, private investment. The authors contributed to this argument by examining the impact of country governance on PPP investment in energy using a sample of countries in SSA.FindingsTherefore, the authors concluded that low control of corruption is responsible for the inadequate volume of PPP investments. In the light of this, the government should redefine the anti-corruption bill of their sovereignty to accommodate severe sanctions when necessary.Originality/valueThis paper uses the fixed effects (FE) model by introducing batteries of nonlinear panel models to capture the relationship between the impacts of country governance on PPP investment in energy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能源和国家治理中的PPP投资动态:来自撒哈拉以南非洲的证据
目的研究PPP模式下治理与能源投资之间的实证关系。为了简洁地解释固定效应(FE)模型中的偏差,作者采用了不同的偏差校正技术。这些技术中的大多数提供了证据,证明通过增加问责制的愿望,优先考虑群众的声音和破坏法治,可以促进PPP在能源领域的投资。本研究未发现腐败控制对PPP能源投资有任何正向影响。SSA电力供应的严重短缺吸引了PPP投资进入经济的能源部门,导致了最近关于治理和公共、私人投资的辩论。作者通过研究国家治理对PPP能源投资的影响,以SSA国家为样本,为这一论点做出了贡献。因此,作者得出结论,腐败控制不力是PPP投资额不足的原因。因此,政府应该重新制定国家主权的反腐败法案,以便在必要时进行严厉制裁。原创性/价值本文通过引入非线性面板模型,采用固定效应(FE)模型来捕捉国家治理对PPP能源投资影响之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Application of lean principles for building refurbishment projects in Sri Lanka Unraveling consumer behavioral intentions to adopt solar water heaters in India using UTAUT model Ex ante required rates of return and related factors in Indonesian PPP infrastructure projects Benefits and challenges of implementing green building development in Nigeria Developing a framework for building information modelling (BIM) adoption in New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1