The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis

IF 3.6 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Inequality Pub Date : 2020-12-20 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3842851
D. Sologon, C. O’Donoghue, Iryna Kyzyma, Jinjing Li, Jules Linden, R. Wagener
{"title":"The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis","authors":"D. Sologon, C. O’Donoghue, Iryna Kyzyma, Jinjing Li, Jules Linden, R. Wagener","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3842851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluate the COVID-19 resilience of a Continental welfare regime by nowcasting the implications of the shock and its associated policy responses on the distribution of household incomes over the whole of 2020. Our approach relies on a dynamic microsimulation modelling that combines a household income generation model estimated on the latest EU-SILC wave with novel nowcasting techniques to calibrate the simulations using external macro controls which reflect the macroeconomic climate during the crisis. We focus on Luxembourg, a country that introduced minor tweaks to the existing tax-benefit system, which has a strong social insurance focus that gave certainty during the crisis. We find the system was well-equipped ahead of the crisis to cushion household incomes against job losses. The income-support policy changes were effective in cushioning household incomes and mitigating an increase in income inequality, allowing average household disposable income and inequality levels to bounce back to pre-crisis levels in the last quarter of 2020. The share of labour incomes dropped, but was compensated by an increase in benefits, reflecting the cushioning effect of the transfer system. Overall market incomes dropped and became more unequal. Their disequalizing evolution was matched by an increase in redistribution, driven by an increase in the generosity of benefits and larger access to benefits. The nowcasting model is a “near” real-time analysis and decision support tool to monitor the recovery, scalable to other countries with high applicability for policymakers.","PeriodicalId":51559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Inequality","volume":"20 1","pages":"777 - 809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3842851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We evaluate the COVID-19 resilience of a Continental welfare regime by nowcasting the implications of the shock and its associated policy responses on the distribution of household incomes over the whole of 2020. Our approach relies on a dynamic microsimulation modelling that combines a household income generation model estimated on the latest EU-SILC wave with novel nowcasting techniques to calibrate the simulations using external macro controls which reflect the macroeconomic climate during the crisis. We focus on Luxembourg, a country that introduced minor tweaks to the existing tax-benefit system, which has a strong social insurance focus that gave certainty during the crisis. We find the system was well-equipped ahead of the crisis to cushion household incomes against job losses. The income-support policy changes were effective in cushioning household incomes and mitigating an increase in income inequality, allowing average household disposable income and inequality levels to bounce back to pre-crisis levels in the last quarter of 2020. The share of labour incomes dropped, but was compensated by an increase in benefits, reflecting the cushioning effect of the transfer system. Overall market incomes dropped and became more unequal. Their disequalizing evolution was matched by an increase in redistribution, driven by an increase in the generosity of benefits and larger access to benefits. The nowcasting model is a “near” real-time analysis and decision support tool to monitor the recovery, scalable to other countries with high applicability for policymakers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲大陆福利制度的抗疫能力——临近危机对分配的影响
我们通过临近预测冲击及其相关政策应对措施对2020年全年家庭收入分配的影响,评估了欧洲大陆福利制度的COVID-19抵御能力。我们的方法依赖于动态微观模拟模型,该模型结合了最新欧盟- silc浪潮估计的家庭创收模型和新颖的临近预测技术,使用反映危机期间宏观经济气候的外部宏观控制来校准模拟。我们关注的是卢森堡,这个国家对现有的税收福利制度进行了微调,该制度以社会保险为重点,在危机期间提供了确定性。我们发现,在危机发生前,该体系已经做好了充分的准备,以缓冲家庭收入对失业的影响。收入支持政策的变化有效地缓冲了家庭收入,缓解了收入不平等的加剧,使家庭平均可支配收入和不平等水平在2020年最后一个季度反弹至危机前的水平。劳动收入的份额下降了,但得到了福利增加的补偿,这反映了转移支付制度的缓冲作用。整体市场收入下降,变得更加不平等。这种不平等的进化与再分配的增加相匹配,再分配的增加是由福利的慷慨增加和更大的福利获取途径所驱动的。临近预报模型是一种监测复苏的“近”实时分析和决策支持工具,可扩展到其他国家,对政策制定者具有很高的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Inequality provides a forum for analysis of ''economic inequality'', broadly defined. Its scope includes: ·         Theoretical and empirical analysis·         Monetary measures of ''well-being'' such as earnings, income, consumption, and wealth; non-monetary measures such as educational achievement and health and health care; multidimensional measures·         Inequality and poverty within and between countries, and globally, and their trends over time·         Inequalities of opportunity·         Income mobility and poverty persistence·         The factor distribution of income·         Differences in ''well-being'' between socioeconomic groups, for example between men and women, generations, or ethnic groups·         The effects of inequality on macroeconomic and other phenomena, and vice versa·         Related statistical methods and data issues ·         Related policy analysis  Papers need to prioritize the ''economic inequality'' dimension. For example, papers about trade and inequality, or inequality and growth, should not primarily be about trade or growth (in which case they should target a different journal). The same is true for papers considering the inter-relationships between the income distribution and the labour market, public policy, or demography.  Officially cited as: J Econ Inequal
期刊最新文献
Martin Ravallion Distributional impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic and the CARES Act. Collective negative shocks and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in Germany. COVID-19 and income inequality: evidence from monthly population registers. Growing up poor but doing well: Contextual factors that predict academic success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1