Using CLA pedagogy to examine an asynchronous supplemental English for academic writing program: Curriculum design and pilot results

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101020
Phuong M. Tran , Sheila Batacharya
{"title":"Using CLA pedagogy to examine an asynchronous supplemental English for academic writing program: Curriculum design and pilot results","authors":"Phuong M. Tran ,&nbsp;Sheila Batacharya","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This manuscript features the curriculum design and pilot results of Professional English Language Skills (PELS), an asynchronous non-credit supplemental English for Academic Writing Program at the University of Toronto Mississauga. Affiliated with academic courses as supplementary literacy instruction, PELS pursues a dual pedagogical goal to support the academic, linguistic, and cultural needs of diverse students on campus and actualize institutional initiatives of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI). To assess PELS’ effectiveness, we adopted a Critical Language Awareness framework (Shapiro, 2022) to analyze students’ course survey responses and written reflections and trace their engagement with interventions on language awareness (LA) and critical language awareness (CLA) development. Findings suggest that students develop LA and CLA simultaneously at varying degrees. Written reflections reveal that students understand the institutionalization of standard English and the benefits of using academic writing conventions to write more effectively; however, they also recognize the legitimacy and cultural values of other English varieties. Linguistically and socioculturally diverse student groups demonstrate distinct aspects of CLA correspondent to their linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Overall, English as an Additional Language (EAL) and non-EAL students value the exposure to linguistic diversity and cross-cultural interactions which educate them about sociolinguistics and EDI. These findings reflect “a dual commitment to pragmatism and progressivism” in language teaching in PELS’ curricular design (Shapiro, 2022).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323000589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This manuscript features the curriculum design and pilot results of Professional English Language Skills (PELS), an asynchronous non-credit supplemental English for Academic Writing Program at the University of Toronto Mississauga. Affiliated with academic courses as supplementary literacy instruction, PELS pursues a dual pedagogical goal to support the academic, linguistic, and cultural needs of diverse students on campus and actualize institutional initiatives of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI). To assess PELS’ effectiveness, we adopted a Critical Language Awareness framework (Shapiro, 2022) to analyze students’ course survey responses and written reflections and trace their engagement with interventions on language awareness (LA) and critical language awareness (CLA) development. Findings suggest that students develop LA and CLA simultaneously at varying degrees. Written reflections reveal that students understand the institutionalization of standard English and the benefits of using academic writing conventions to write more effectively; however, they also recognize the legitimacy and cultural values of other English varieties. Linguistically and socioculturally diverse student groups demonstrate distinct aspects of CLA correspondent to their linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Overall, English as an Additional Language (EAL) and non-EAL students value the exposure to linguistic diversity and cross-cultural interactions which educate them about sociolinguistics and EDI. These findings reflect “a dual commitment to pragmatism and progressivism” in language teaching in PELS’ curricular design (Shapiro, 2022).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用CLA教学法检验学术写作异步补充英语课程:课程设计和试点结果
这份手稿的特点是专业英语语言技能(PELS)的课程设计和试点结果,这是多伦多大学密西沙加分校学术写作项目的异步非学分补充英语。作为学术课程的补充,PELS追求双重教学目标,以支持校园内不同学生的学术,语言和文化需求,并实现公平,多样性和包容(EDI)的机构倡议。为了评估PELS的有效性,我们采用了一个批判性语言意识框架(Shapiro, 2022)来分析学生的课程调查反馈和书面反思,并追踪他们对语言意识(LA)和批判性语言意识(CLA)发展干预的参与情况。研究结果表明,学生在不同程度上同时发展LA和CLA。书面反思表明,学生理解标准英语的制度化和使用学术写作惯例的好处,以更有效地写作;然而,他们也承认其他英语变体的合法性和文化价值。语言和社会文化多样化的学生群体表现出与其语言和文化背景相对应的不同方面。总的来说,英语作为附加语言(EAL)和非EAL学生重视接触语言多样性和跨文化互动,这可以教育他们社会语言学和EDI。这些发现反映了PELS课程设计中的语言教学“实用主义和进步主义的双重承诺”(Shapiro, 2022)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
期刊最新文献
Ungrading as an assessment philosophy: Reliability, validity, and practicality Questions of time and communication: A writing program administrator's experiences with labor-based grading Towards a reconciliatory approach to ungrading in writing classes: A response to Crusan Writing performance and discourse organization in L2 Chinese: A longitudinal case study Ungrading: Revolution or evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1