Introducing the Flow Triever Mechanical Thrombectomy Device: A Nonthrombolytic Catheter-directed Approach for Intermediate to High–risk Pulmonary Embolism

N. Salam, L. Lande, L. Greenspon, D. Zappetti
{"title":"Introducing the Flow Triever Mechanical Thrombectomy Device: A Nonthrombolytic Catheter-directed Approach for Intermediate to High–risk Pulmonary Embolism","authors":"N. Salam, L. Lande, L. Greenspon, D. Zappetti","doi":"10.1097/CPM.0000000000000360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synopsis: The FLARE (FlowTriever Pulmonary Embolectomy Clinical Study) is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial in which 106 patients at 18 different US sites with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) were treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy using the FlowTriever Retrieval/Aspiration System. The investigators found that the FlowTriever device met its primary effectiveness endpoint with a mean reduction in the right ventricular/left ventricular ratio at 48 hours of 0.38 (25.1%; P< 0.00010). Treated patients also had a small decrease in anatomic degree of thrombus (10% by modified Miller score), and those with pulmonary hypertension exhibited a 3.2 mmHg reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure (P< 0.0001). There were no cases of intracranial hemorrhage, device-related cardiac or pulmonary injury, or device-related deaths. This study introduces an additional modality for the treatment of intermediate to high–risk PE. The change in right ventricular/left ventricular ratio with FlowTriever embolectomy is similar to that noted with other trials investigating catheter-directed thrombolysis and better than that of anticoagulation alone. What sets this device apart from many of its predecessors is that it does not require thrombolytics, offering a safer option to patients with absolute or relative contraindications to systemic thrombolysis. FlowTriever has shown promising results in reducing early right ventricular strain in patients with intermediate-risk PE, but its place in the algorithm in the treatment of PE will more likely be for higher risk PE, especially when relative or absolute contraindications to thrombolysis exist. The long-term benefits for patients with intermediate-risk PE will require further study. Source: Tu T, Toma C, Tapson VF, et al. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy for intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism: the FLARE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019:12.9:859–869.","PeriodicalId":10393,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPM.0000000000000360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synopsis: The FLARE (FlowTriever Pulmonary Embolectomy Clinical Study) is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial in which 106 patients at 18 different US sites with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) were treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy using the FlowTriever Retrieval/Aspiration System. The investigators found that the FlowTriever device met its primary effectiveness endpoint with a mean reduction in the right ventricular/left ventricular ratio at 48 hours of 0.38 (25.1%; P< 0.00010). Treated patients also had a small decrease in anatomic degree of thrombus (10% by modified Miller score), and those with pulmonary hypertension exhibited a 3.2 mmHg reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure (P< 0.0001). There were no cases of intracranial hemorrhage, device-related cardiac or pulmonary injury, or device-related deaths. This study introduces an additional modality for the treatment of intermediate to high–risk PE. The change in right ventricular/left ventricular ratio with FlowTriever embolectomy is similar to that noted with other trials investigating catheter-directed thrombolysis and better than that of anticoagulation alone. What sets this device apart from many of its predecessors is that it does not require thrombolytics, offering a safer option to patients with absolute or relative contraindications to systemic thrombolysis. FlowTriever has shown promising results in reducing early right ventricular strain in patients with intermediate-risk PE, but its place in the algorithm in the treatment of PE will more likely be for higher risk PE, especially when relative or absolute contraindications to thrombolysis exist. The long-term benefits for patients with intermediate-risk PE will require further study. Source: Tu T, Toma C, Tapson VF, et al. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy for intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism: the FLARE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019:12.9:859–869.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flow Triever机械血栓切除装置介绍:一种非溶栓导管导向的中高危肺栓塞治疗方法
简介:FLAR(FlowTriever肺栓塞临床研究)是一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心的试验,在该试验中,来自18个不同US部位的106名中危肺栓塞(PE)患者使用FlowTriever检索/抽吸系统进行了经皮机械血栓切除术治疗。研究人员发现,FlowTriever装置在48小时内达到了其主要有效性终点,右心室/左心室比率平均降低0.38(25.1%;P<0.00010)。接受治疗的患者血栓解剖程度也略有降低(改良Miller评分为10%),肺动脉高压患者的平均肺动脉压降低了3.2mmHg(P<0.0001)。没有颅内出血、设备相关的心肺损伤或设备相关的死亡病例。本研究介绍了一种治疗中高风险PE的额外方法。FlowTriever栓子切除术的右心室/左心室比率变化与其他研究导管导向溶栓的试验相似,并且优于单独抗凝。该设备与许多前代设备的不同之处在于,它不需要溶栓药物,为有绝对或相对全身溶栓禁忌症的患者提供了更安全的选择。FlowTriever在降低中危PE患者早期右心室应变方面显示出了有希望的结果,但其在PE治疗算法中的地位更有可能是针对高危PE,尤其是当存在溶栓的相对或绝对禁忌症时。中危PE患者的长期益处需要进一步研究。资料来源:Tu T,Toma C,Tapson VF等。导管导向机械血栓切除术治疗中危急性肺栓塞的前瞻性单臂多中心试验:FLARE研究。JACC心血管介入。2019:12.9:859–869。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Pulmonary Medicine provides a forum for the discussion of important new knowledge in the field of pulmonary medicine that is of interest and relevance to the practitioner. This goal is achieved through mini-reviews on focused sub-specialty topics in areas covered within the journal. These areas include: Obstructive Airways Disease; Respiratory Infections; Interstitial, Inflammatory, and Occupational Diseases; Clinical Practice Management; Critical Care/Respiratory Care; Colleagues in Respiratory Medicine; and Topics in Respiratory Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Systemic sclerosis associated myopathy: how to treat. Axillary lymphadenopathy in a high-risk breast screening patient following the COVID-19 vaccine: a diagnostic conundrum. Is a Trial of Observation Safer Than Intervention With Spontaneous Pneumothorax? The Complex Relationship Between Poor Sleep Quality and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and the Role of Lung Biopsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1