LA SEPARACIÓN DE PODERES Y EL SISTEMA DE PESOS Y CONTRAPESOS EN ESTADOS UNIDOS: DEL SUEÑO DE HAMILTON, MADISON Y MARSHALL A LA AMENAZA DE LA PRESIDENCIA IMPERIAL

Q4 Social Sciences Juridicas Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.17151/JURID.2018.15.2.3
David Mendieta, Mary Luz Tobón-Tobón
{"title":"LA SEPARACIÓN DE PODERES Y EL SISTEMA DE PESOS Y CONTRAPESOS EN ESTADOS UNIDOS: DEL SUEÑO DE HAMILTON, MADISON Y MARSHALL A LA AMENAZA DE LA PRESIDENCIA IMPERIAL","authors":"David Mendieta, Mary Luz Tobón-Tobón","doi":"10.17151/JURID.2018.15.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to determine whether, after 230 years of the Constitution of the United Stated of America, the pillars of the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances that authors like Hamilton, Madison and Marshall helped design or, otherwise, whether what some authors call “the imperial presidency” has been implemented. The methodology used is of a dogmatic historical nature. The conclusion is that the personality of the president of the American Union has become a noninstitutionalized limit which is extremely dangerous and contradicts the very idea of the Rule of Law. Facing the threat of the “president emperor”, today it is unavoidable to remember the principles that inspired the Constitution of the United States and the limits it imposes on the different powers, including the executive. Key worDs: United States, constitution, imperial presidency, constitutionality control, system of checks and balances, Trump. David Mendieta y Mary Luz Tobón-Tobón","PeriodicalId":38421,"journal":{"name":"Juridicas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17151/JURID.2018.15.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to determine whether, after 230 years of the Constitution of the United Stated of America, the pillars of the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances that authors like Hamilton, Madison and Marshall helped design or, otherwise, whether what some authors call “the imperial presidency” has been implemented. The methodology used is of a dogmatic historical nature. The conclusion is that the personality of the president of the American Union has become a noninstitutionalized limit which is extremely dangerous and contradicts the very idea of the Rule of Law. Facing the threat of the “president emperor”, today it is unavoidable to remember the principles that inspired the Constitution of the United States and the limits it imposes on the different powers, including the executive. Key worDs: United States, constitution, imperial presidency, constitutionality control, system of checks and balances, Trump. David Mendieta y Mary Luz Tobón-Tobón
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的分权与制衡制度:从汉密尔顿、麦迪逊和马歇尔的梦想到帝国总统的威胁
本文的目的是确定,在《美利坚合众国宪法》颁布230年后,汉密尔顿、麦迪逊和马歇尔等作家帮助设计的分权和制衡制度的支柱是否已经实施,或者,一些作者所说的“帝国总统制”是否已经实施。所使用的方法论具有教条主义的历史性质。结论是,美国联邦总统的人格已经成为一种非宪法化的限制,这是极其危险的,与法治的理念相矛盾。面对“总统-皇帝”的威胁,今天不可避免地要记住启发美国宪法的原则,以及宪法对包括行政部门在内的不同权力的限制。关键问题:美国,宪法,帝国总统,合宪性控制,制衡体系,特朗普。David Mendieta和Mary Luz Tobón
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Juridicas
Juridicas Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista JURÍDICAS, a result of the effort of the professors and students of the University of Caldas and the invited academics, is oriented to the publication of unpublished essays and of high scientific quality that correspond, fundamentally, to results or advances of research projects, Articles Reflection, translations and bibliographical reviews related to the development of legal science and the state of the art in the legal and socio-legal fields. It aims to contribute to the consolidation of a permanent intellectual production that disseminates legal knowledge in the areas of regional, national and international.
期刊最新文献
Las operaciones militares contra las llamadas “bandas criminales” en Colombia: entre el riesgo de exceso de fuerza y la inseguridad jurídica Trayectoria criminal de mujeres detenidas por Carabineros de Chile en 2007, por violencia intrafamiliar, seguidas hasta 2016 Postulados informadores de la ejecución de la pena privativa de libertad en el escenario jurídico contemporáneo Resonancias iusnaturalistas en el utilitarismo de Jeremy Bentham Re-pensando la clínica jurídica de la Universidad Católica Luis Amigó a partir de la formación basada en competencias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1