The Folk Song of the Ashkenazim: The Problem of Genre Definition

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-25 DOI:10.1353/sho.2022.0023
E. Khazdan
{"title":"The Folk Song of the Ashkenazim: The Problem of Genre Definition","authors":"E. Khazdan","doi":"10.1353/sho.2022.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Preparing the first collection of Jewish folk songs for publication (1901), S. M. Ginsburg and P. S. Marek divided the material into groups according to genres. These methods of classifying largely determined the further development of folklore research both in Europe and Russia. New generations of scholars were brought up in accordance with this tradition, and perceived it as the basis for further research. Over the past century, the classification of genres proposed by Ginzburg and Marek has never been the subject of reflection and critical analysis. We could see that the compilers were looking for new, more convenient approaches to systematize the song material, but the scholars who were engaged in research of the Jewish musical tradition after World War II tried to adhere to the canon set at the beginning of the twentieth century. The purpose of this article is, first, to determine what has served as a model for genre classification, and second, to follow subsequent changes in the criteria in the definition of genres and in the approaches to the publication of song collections. An overview of a collection of folk song in Yiddish, published in the period from 1901 to 2007, as well as comparative analysis of their structures, allows the author to find \"missing links\" and to shed light to the reason for these changes.","PeriodicalId":21809,"journal":{"name":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"58 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2022.0023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Preparing the first collection of Jewish folk songs for publication (1901), S. M. Ginsburg and P. S. Marek divided the material into groups according to genres. These methods of classifying largely determined the further development of folklore research both in Europe and Russia. New generations of scholars were brought up in accordance with this tradition, and perceived it as the basis for further research. Over the past century, the classification of genres proposed by Ginzburg and Marek has never been the subject of reflection and critical analysis. We could see that the compilers were looking for new, more convenient approaches to systematize the song material, but the scholars who were engaged in research of the Jewish musical tradition after World War II tried to adhere to the canon set at the beginning of the twentieth century. The purpose of this article is, first, to determine what has served as a model for genre classification, and second, to follow subsequent changes in the criteria in the definition of genres and in the approaches to the publication of song collections. An overview of a collection of folk song in Yiddish, published in the period from 1901 to 2007, as well as comparative analysis of their structures, allows the author to find "missing links" and to shed light to the reason for these changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿什肯纳兹民歌:流派界定问题
摘要:在准备出版的第一部犹太民歌合集(1901年)时,S. M.金斯伯格和P. S.马雷克根据流派将材料分成了几组。这些分类方法在很大程度上决定了欧洲和俄罗斯民俗研究的进一步发展。新一代的学者是按照这一传统长大的,并将其视为进一步研究的基础。在过去的一个世纪里,金兹伯格和马雷克提出的体裁分类从未成为反思和批判分析的主题。我们可以看到,编纂者正在寻找新的、更方便的方法来系统化歌曲材料,但二战后从事犹太音乐传统研究的学者们试图坚持20世纪初制定的正典。本文的目的是,首先,确定什么是类型分类的模型,其次,跟踪类型定义标准和歌曲集出版方法的后续变化。通过对1901年至2007年间出版的意第绪语民歌集的概述,以及对其结构的比较分析,作者可以找到“缺失的环节”,并阐明这些变化的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Ladin in Lineage: Through the Doors of Jewish Gendered Life at Yeshiva University's Stern College for Women Un-Settled Questions: Frontier Logic and Satmar Political Theology A Specter Haunting Holocaust Studies: The Muselmann Did Jews Die as Muslims in Auschwitz? Specters of the Muselmann Transmatriation? Avishag the Shunammite in Three Contemporary Israeli Novels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1