Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI:10.1159/000524125
Z. Fei, Zhongsheng Chen, Xi Du, Haijun Cao, Changqing Li
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Z. Fei, Zhongsheng Chen, Xi Du, Haijun Cao, Changqing Li","doi":"10.1159/000524125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in more than 200 million infections and 4 million deaths. The blood derivative therapy represented by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and convalescent plasma (CP) therapy may be the promising therapeutics for COVID-19. Methods: A systematic article search was performed for eligible studies published up to August 3, 2021, through the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library. The included articles were screened by using rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Quality of studies and risk of bias were evaluated. Results: A total of 5 IVIG therapy and 13 CP therapy randomized controlled trials were included with a sample size of 13,696 subjects diagnosed with COVID-19. IVIG could reduce the mortality compared with the control group (RR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46–0.93, p = 0.02). The use of CP did not effectively reduce the mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91–1.03, p = 0.38), the length of hospital stay (MD −0.47, 95% CI: −4.13 to 3.20, p = 0.80), and the mechanical ventilation use (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89–1.07, p = 0.62) of the patients with COVID-19. Treatment with IVIG or CP was not significantly associated with an increase in reported adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94–1.22, p = 0.28). Conclusions: Treatment with IVIG could be effective and safe to improve survival for patients with COVID-19. But the benefit of CP in the treatment of COVID-19 is limited. The certainty of the evidence was moderate for all outcomes.","PeriodicalId":23252,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":"49 1","pages":"388 - 400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000524125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in more than 200 million infections and 4 million deaths. The blood derivative therapy represented by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and convalescent plasma (CP) therapy may be the promising therapeutics for COVID-19. Methods: A systematic article search was performed for eligible studies published up to August 3, 2021, through the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library. The included articles were screened by using rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Quality of studies and risk of bias were evaluated. Results: A total of 5 IVIG therapy and 13 CP therapy randomized controlled trials were included with a sample size of 13,696 subjects diagnosed with COVID-19. IVIG could reduce the mortality compared with the control group (RR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46–0.93, p = 0.02). The use of CP did not effectively reduce the mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91–1.03, p = 0.38), the length of hospital stay (MD −0.47, 95% CI: −4.13 to 3.20, p = 0.80), and the mechanical ventilation use (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89–1.07, p = 0.62) of the patients with COVID-19. Treatment with IVIG or CP was not significantly associated with an increase in reported adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94–1.22, p = 0.28). Conclusions: Treatment with IVIG could be effective and safe to improve survival for patients with COVID-19. But the benefit of CP in the treatment of COVID-19 is limited. The certainty of the evidence was moderate for all outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎患者血液衍生物治疗的有效性和安全性:系统评价和Meta-Analysis
背景:新冠肺炎疫情已导致2亿多人感染,400万人死亡。以静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)和恢复期血浆(CP)为代表的血液衍生物疗法可能是治疗新冠肺炎的有前景的疗法。方法:通过PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆对截至2021年8月3日发表的符合条件的研究进行系统的文章搜索。纳入的文章采用严格的纳入和排除标准进行筛选。所有分析均使用Review Manager 5.4进行。评估了研究质量和偏倚风险。结果:共纳入5项IVIG治疗和13项CP治疗随机对照试验,样本量为13696名诊断为新冠肺炎的受试者。与对照组相比,IVIG可降低死亡率(RR 0.65,95%CI:0.46–0.93,p=0.02)。使用CP并不能有效降低新冠肺炎患者的死亡率(RR 0.97,95%CI=0.91–1.03,p=0.38)、住院时间(MD−0.47,95%CI−4.13至3.20,p=0.80)和机械通气使用(RR=0.98,95%CI0.89–1.07,p=0.62)。IVIG或CP治疗与报告的不良事件增加没有显著相关性(RR 1.07,95%CI:0.94–1.22,p=0.28)。结论:IVIG治疗可以有效和安全地提高新冠肺炎患者的生存率。但CP在治疗新冠肺炎方面的益处是有限的。对于所有结果,证据的确定性都是适度的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to all areas of transfusion medicine. These include the quality and security of blood products, therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives, transfusion-related questions in transplantation, stem cell manipulation, therapeutic and diagnostic problems of homeostasis, immuno-hematological investigations, and legal aspects of the production of blood products as well as hemotherapy. Both comprehensive reviews and primary publications that detail the newest work in transfusion medicine and hemotherapy promote the international exchange of knowledge within these disciplines. Consistent with this goal, continuing clinical education is also specifically addressed.
期刊最新文献
Erratum. Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapy. Classical Haematology: Dynamic Development at the Interface of Transfusion Medicine and Haematology. Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Treatment. Sickle Cell Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1